07-11-2006, 10:31 AM | #1 |
Dracolich
Join Date: January 24, 2004
Location: UK
Age: 41
Posts: 3,092
|
No link as yet, but quite a momentous turnaround.
Whether it'll apply to those held in secret prisons remains to be seen. Edit: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/5169600.stm Apparently the change has been leaked from an internal memo, following the Supreme Court decision a couple of weeks ago. [ 07-11-2006, 10:34 AM: Message edited by: shamrock_uk ] |
07-11-2006, 05:23 PM | #2 |
40th Level Warrior
Join Date: July 11, 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 11,916
|
Look, under the Geneva Convention, which is LAW here in the US, you have 2 types of people: civilians and enemy soldiers. Call them "combatants," "agents," "f-tards," or whatever, if they are prisoners of war they have to be treated by certain rules.
And, btw, who's your daddy? Who told you this day would come for 3 years now? Hmmm.... *looks around.* Well, whoever he is, I know he's a heckuva guy. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The true background of Guantanemo detainees | shamrock_uk | General Discussion | 20 | 03-10-2006 05:14 PM |
Double Standards- U.S. and the Geneva Convention | Chewbacca | General Discussion | 34 | 05-17-2004 12:15 PM |
Supreme Court Allows Secrecy for 9/11 Detainees | Dreamer128 | General Discussion | 1 | 01-13-2004 10:55 AM |
Rethinking on the 'detainees' | Garnet FalconDance | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 9 | 02-15-2002 01:23 PM |