Visit the Ironworks Gaming Website Email the Webmaster Graphics Library Rules and Regulations Help Support Ironworks Forum with a Donation to Keep us Online - We rely totally on Donations from members Donation goal Meter

Ironworks Gaming Radio

Ironworks Gaming Forum

Go Back   Ironworks Gaming Forum > Ironworks Gaming Forums > Baldurs Gate II: Shadows of Amn & Throne of Bhaal
FAQ Calendar Arcade Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-16-2003, 06:12 PM   #31
Tancred
White Dragon
 

Join Date: April 1, 2001
Location: UK
Age: 45
Posts: 1,893
Quote:
Originally posted by SixOfSpades:

quote:
Originally posted by Tancred:
Anyone who had the lore to make an informed choice could see that to be an Elf was to have a sorrowful existence. The Elven race sums up one of the key themes of Lord of the Rings; loss, and dealing with loss.

Hold on a minute--you make it sound like the entire race is whimpering and curling up into a fetal position to die. The only way in which the Elves are fading is that not only is the Enemy causing them to die (an incredible and irreparable loss), but it's even killing them faster than they can reproduce. They have no choice but to abandon the sinking ship that is Middle-Earth; I'm sure their cities in Aman are quite prosperous, and I'd hardly call that a "sorrowful existence."
[/QUOTE]I think my point must have been miscommunicated somehow... I'm not saying the real tragedy is that the Elven race is dying out. The tragedy, from the Elven point of view, is that they love Middle-Earth, and they love it absolutely and completely. They honour it, they nurture it. They love it in a way that we as humans cannot understand, because they are so in tune with it. To survive in Middle-Earth they've had to harden themselves, choke back grief, deny tears, carry on in the face of despair as their world and their race simply dies around them. And at the end, after countless hundreds, thousands of years, to know that their valiance and the sacrifice of the lives of countless Elves who were not made to die has still resulted in the death of so much that they loved, and to have to confront the harsh, bitter truth that they've come to the end and now they have to take what they can salvage and leave *even if somehow they win* - that's where the tragedy lies. It's not grief for themselves, but grief for the world they live in, that is the source.

"The greatest single Evil remaining in the world would be....Shelob, perhaps, unless there's another Balrog somewhere, and the greatest left to oppose them would be....Bombadil, perhaps, or Fangorn. All things grow small."

Well, the greatest left to oppose them - whoever they might be - would be Mankind! [img]smile.gif[/img] The trees DO bloom again, in a fashion - Aragorn finds a tiny sprout of the sapling of the White Tree of Gondor, which is itself grown from a fruit of the Tree of Valinor upon Numenor. The end of Lord of the Rings is not, I believe, another step in a great decline, but the handing-over from one era to the next. And that era will grow great again, no doubt, and create great works of its' own... and perhaps in time, it will decline too. In fact, if you see Lord of the Rings as a prehistory, then we're still living in the Fourth Age. We may not have palantiri, but we have the Internet.

As to the other evils... there was a serious debate about all this on another forum and they all wondered if there weren't other lieutenants of Sauron out there. There's the Mouth of Sauron, missing in action. And the 'wild cards', the unaccounted-for two wizards who went into the East, never to return. If Saruman could fall from grace, so might they.The men of the South and East never do fully surrender their hatred of Gondor, at least not in the years chronicled by Tolkien. The ruins of Angmar may yet harbour wights and foul creatures who cling to their bitterness and hatred of life.

"But that, dear readers, is another tale." [img]smile.gif[/img]

[ 09-16-2003, 06:14 PM: Message edited by: Tancred ]
__________________
\"HELP! I\'ve superglued myself to a flaming bowling ball!\"
Tancred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2003, 02:54 AM   #32
SixOfSpades
Dracolisk
 

Join Date: September 16, 2001
Location: Bellingham, WA, USA
Age: 48
Posts: 6,901
Quote:
Originally posted by White Lancer:
Shelob is pretty thick, she damn near commited suicide by impaling herself on Sting.....Shelob is greater than any single man or orc, but she (he?) is only one, the race of men is legion.
Actually, I don't fault her actions at all. How the hell was SHE to know just how tough Hobbits are, especially when armed with an artifact-level Phial of Galadriel and two highly enchanted shortswords? (Sting's gotta be at least +3, whereas it must have been an Age since Shelob even saw anything higher than a +1.)

And yes, that is precisely what I meant by "greatest single evil."

Quote:
Originally posted by Devv:
As for the evil left in the world, it wouldn't be the orcs. Of course when Sauron died they lost all sense of purpose and didn't have any will to continue. They were fuelled at first by the will of Morgoth, then by the will of Sauron. Without either present, the orcs were lost.
Not quite. The Orc race was not created by Morgoth, it was only twisted from its Elven beginnings. Orcs quite clearly have minds of their own and are perfectly capable of rational throught without divine empowerment. In the final battle before the Black Gate, you'll see that only those creatures (or parts thereof) that were absolutely created by Sauron (such as the intelligence of the Olog-Hai, or the foundations of Barad-dur) or extended beyond their natural span by Sauron's will to such an extent that they actually depended on his continued existence (the Nazgul) were actually destroyed with Sauron's downfall. The Orcs, however, were simply crazed with fear.

Quote:
Originally posted by Tancred:
As for Glorfindel, I am reasonably sure. It's a debated subject. I sit on the 'yes' side of the fence. There's little evidence either way...
Well, the fact that Tolkien describes Glorfindel pitching down a mountain chasm, still locked in battle with a Balrog, is rather indicative that the Glorfindel in Rivendell is not the same one present at the siege of Gondolin. But the passage that Devv quoted, the one that describes Glorfindel as being an "Eldar from beyond the furthest seas" and having "dwelt in the Blessed Realm," seems to imply that it is the same one. Perhaps there were two high-ranking Glorfindels among the Flight of the Noldor, but I doubt it, and the genealogies back me up. Maybe, just maybe, a second Glorfindel came to Middle-Earth in the Assault of the Valar at the end of the First Age, and remained. An "Elf-lord of a house of princes" need not appear in the House of Finwe if the Elf-lord in question was one of the Vanyar.

Quote:
Originally posted by Tancred:
The tragedy, from the Elven point of view, is that they love Middle-Earth, and they love it absolutely and completely. ... And at the end, after countless hundreds, thousands of years, to know that their valiance and the sacrifice of the lives of countless Elves who were not made to die has still resulted in the death of so much that they loved, and to have to confront the harsh, bitter truth that they've come to the end and now they have to take what they can salvage and leave *even if somehow they win* - that's where the tragedy lies.
Okay, that makes a lot of sense.

Quote:
The trees DO bloom again, in a fashion - Aragorn finds a tiny sprout of the sapling of the White Tree of Gondor, which is itself grown from a fruit of the Tree of Valinor upon Numenor. The end of Lord of the Rings is not, I believe, another step in a great decline, but the handing-over from one era to the next. And that era will grow great again, no doubt, and create great works of its' own...
The end of LotR is not an end to the decay, it is merely a temporary restoration that brings back only a portion of the former glory. Gondor now has a King again, true, who has carried on the family tradition of marrying the highest-ranking eligible Elven female, and he has restored Minas Tirith--but what of Osgiliath? What of Arnor? Aragorn has found a scion of the White Tree, yes, but what of Nimloth? What of Telperion? This theme of great good and great evil destroying each other's greatness to produce the mundane is hammered on again and again in Tolkien's works. From the Valar vs. Melkor, we have the Noldor vs. Morgoth, then the Eldar & Numenoreans vs. Sauron, Gandalf vs. the Balrog, etc., until finally we're left with Frodo vs. Sharkey, leading us to assume that the rest of Middle-Earth is very shortly to be all about Barliman Butterbur vs. Bill Ferny.
I do not see any greatness forthcoming in the Fourth Age. I see complacence and uniformity.
__________________
Volothamp's Comeuppance
Everything you ever needed to know about the entire Baldur's Gate series......except spoilers.
SixOfSpades is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2003, 11:46 AM   #33
Devv
The Magister
 

Join Date: August 19, 2003
Location: Amn, city of coin
Age: 43
Posts: 138
Because the fourth age was an age of men, like our world seems to be. You can assume that they would have developed much like we have today. Tolkien is always seeming to imply in some ways that his tales are our worlds pre-history too. This makes me think what sort of greatness we have achieved, for bad or good because of Six's last comment.

Right away I think of nuclear weapons, the ability to destroy our own planet utterly. This sure is something that the elves never worked out I think of the internet...or going back a bit, just the basic telegram system. Like Tancred said "we may not have palantirs, but we have the internet."

It is ok to assume that an age of men in Tolkiens writings would come up with the same as our age of men I think and we are certainly not lacking in greatness, wether it is good or bad.
Devv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2003, 02:09 PM   #34
Tancred
White Dragon
 

Join Date: April 1, 2001
Location: UK
Age: 45
Posts: 1,893
Quote:
Originally posted by SixOfSpades:
Well, the fact that Tolkien describes Glorfindel pitching down a mountain chasm, still locked in battle with a Balrog, is rather indicative that the Glorfindel in Rivendell is not the same one present at the siege of Gondolin. But the passage that Devv quoted, the one that describes Glorfindel as being an "Eldar from beyond the furthest seas" and having "dwelt in the Blessed Realm," seems to imply that it is the same one. Perhaps there were two high-ranking Glorfindels among the Flight of the Noldor, but I doubt it, and the genealogies back me up. Maybe, just maybe, a second Glorfindel came to Middle-Earth in the Assault of the Valar at the end of the First Age, and remained. An "Elf-lord of a house of princes" need not appear in the House of Finwe if the Elf-lord in question was one of the Vanyar.
As I say, not much evidence either way... the fact that he fell to his death while fighting a Balrog is pretty conclusive evidence of his death, admittedly, but then... falling... fighting a Balrog... dying... and coming back to life... hmm. Where have I heard that before? [img]smile.gif[/img]

You ask, "What of Osgiliath? What of Arnor?"... well, Osgiliath is rebuilt, and although it is no longer the capital of Gondor it still manages to become a happy, bustling port-city. Aragorn comes to the North and re-establishes Arnor, and has Fornost Erain rebuilt - his court alternate between it and Minas Tirith every ten years. Arnor is restored as a Kingdom once more. The Greenway is opened up, and colonisation begins of the vast open expanses of Hollin. Of all the ancient towers of Gondor, only Minas Ithil is left alone. It is torn down bit by bit and the stone is taken away, but the site is left undisturbed. No-one wants to mess with whatever might still be there. Apart from this one exception, rebuilding and renewal are the hallmarks of Elessar's reign.
__________________
\"HELP! I\'ve superglued myself to a flaming bowling ball!\"
Tancred is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Where are my HLA's? Marty4 Baldurs Gate II: Shadows of Amn & Throne of Bhaal 6 02-26-2005 05:06 PM
HLA's in SOA Dar'tanian Baldurs Gate II: Shadows of Amn & Throne of Bhaal 7 10-09-2003 09:39 PM
Question about HLA's Maelakin Baldurs Gate II: Shadows of Amn & Throne of Bhaal 9 10-03-2003 02:35 PM
HLA's and SOA ElegantProse Baldurs Gate II: Shadows of Amn & Throne of Bhaal 3 04-26-2003 02:38 PM
F/M/C and Mage HLA's Rataxes Baldurs Gate II: Shadows of Amn & Throne of Bhaal 28 03-18-2003 11:08 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2024 Ironworks Gaming & ©2024 The Great Escape Studios TM - All Rights Reserved