![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#161 | |
40th Level Warrior
![]() |
Quote:
[ 08-11-2003, 10:37 PM: Message edited by: johnny ]
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#162 |
Very Mad Bird
![]() Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Breukelen (over the river from New Amsterdam)
Age: 53
Posts: 9,246
|
Moose, the difference is the Qu'ran regards Muslims who live in peace without going to war as "lesser" than people who do. If I recall correctly, they are supposed to inhabit a lesser heaven.
In any case, the only assurance of salvation is in Martyrdom. Not even Mohammad had an assurance. When asked he said he did not know what Allah would do with him. So, the Muslim who follows their exemplar Mohammads life to the letter has no assurance of salvation, but the Muslim who dies fighting the infidel does. For the Christian, to know Jesus and receive him into your life, accepting his death on your behalf, is to have assurance of salvation. Additionally, if you followed Jesus to the letter, you would not raise a fist in self defense, you would go to your death so others would live. If you followed Mohammads life to the letter, you would raze cities, massacre people, displace and murder them. Which sounds like a religion of peace to you? Mohammad gave instructions on how to kill your enemies. Jesus taught us to love our enemies. Love them and show kindness. He taught us to turn the other cheek. To forgive endlessly. To treat others how we want to be treated. To not judge others. Christians when they go to war, are failing to live up to Jesus teaching. This doesn't affect their salvation, and they may well know and love Jesus, but, by killing another human, they are performing an action at odds with Jesus life, teaching, example and desire. The Muslim who goes to war and kills his enemy, is doing exactly as Mohammad instructed. Big difference yes? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#163 | |
Very Mad Bird
![]() Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Breukelen (over the river from New Amsterdam)
Age: 53
Posts: 9,246
|
Quote:
The bible also continually cross references itself. It doesn't contradict itself. It uses itself as a proof. The fact that Grace completes Law is not a contradiction. The New Testament would not exist without the Old. Without the laws of the old testament, there would be no understanding of Jesus Grace. Does the roof of a house contradict the foundation simply because it has a different shape, different function and the opposite position in the scheme of the house? Neither does the Qu'ran contradict itself. The Qu'rans messages of peace work within and Islamic world. The messages of violence of for those outside that world. It's so convenient to fall back on "oh these books contradict themselves". It's far harder to read them, understand them and assess the complexities without a preset discreditative agenda. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#164 | |
Gold Dragon
![]() Join Date: June 18, 2002
Location: Wolfville, NS / Calgary, AB
Age: 38
Posts: 2,563
|
Quote:
Jihad, originally was as a defensive exercise. Jihad, in the Koran ( [img]graemlins/offtopic.gif[/img] How exactly do you spell it?) was meant as a form of faith self-defense: the heathens being referred to are those trying to remove the system of belief of Muslims. I am unsure of what particular parts of the Koran (I am not exactly a religious scholar) you are quoting, but I know that there is a large section that deals with the (self-defense, not flying airplanes into buildings) Jihad. I believe that the martyrs of which are spoken in the Koran are those who choose to die for their religion, and the ones who go to a lesser heaven are the ones who don't have the guts to fight for their religion. They are expressly forbidden from killing innocents, IIRC. I also am forced to wonder whether there is simply a culture gap between Muslims and Christians. For example, some parts of the Bible are considered folklore. There are few people who will take the Bible literally word-for-word (and I mean no offense for any who do, just saying.) Could there possibly be a misunderstanding? I agree that the language seems strong, and I could be wrong (no offense, but I haven't seen any of the quotes in greater context (obviously)), but I think we both have a long ways to go in the sense of comprehending each others' different cultures.
__________________
[img]\"http://i44.photobucket.com/albums/f13/true_moose/Siggy.jpg\" alt=\" - \" /> |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#165 | |
Zartan
![]() Join Date: July 18, 2001
Location: America, On The Beautiful Earth
Age: 52
Posts: 5,373
|
Quote:
The bible also continually cross references itself. It doesn't contradict itself. It uses itself as a proof. The fact that Grace completes Law is not a contradiction. The New Testament would not exist without the Old. Without the laws of the old testament, there would be no understanding of Jesus Grace. Does the roof of a house contradict the foundation simply because it has a different shape, different function and the opposite position in the scheme of the house? Neither does the Qu'ran contradict itself. The Qu'rans messages of peace work within and Islamic world. The messages of violence of for those outside that world. It's so convenient to fall back on "oh these books contradict themselves". It's far harder to read them, understand them and assess the complexities without a preset discreditative agenda. [/QUOTE]Thanks for saying please. Call contradiction whatever you want for whatever reason you want. I'll call it contradiction. [img]smile.gif[/img]
__________________
Support Local Music and Record Stores! Got Liberty? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#166 | |
Ninja Storm Shadow
![]() Join Date: March 27, 2001
Location: Northport,Alabama, USA
Age: 63
Posts: 3,577
|
Quote:
[ 08-12-2003, 12:19 AM: Message edited by: John D Harris ]
__________________
Crustiest of the OLD COOTS "Donating mirrors for years to help the Liberal/Socialist find their collective rear-ends, because both hands doesn't seem to be working. Veitnam 61-65:KIA 1864 66:KIA 5008 67:KIA 9378 68:KIA 14594 69:KIA 9414 70:KIA 4221 71:KIA 1380 72:KIA 300 Afghanistan2001-2008 KIA 585 2009-2012 KIA 1465 and counting Davros 1 Much abliged Massachusetts |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#167 | |
Very Mad Bird
![]() Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Breukelen (over the river from New Amsterdam)
Age: 53
Posts: 9,246
|
Quote:
Post proof or recant. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#168 | |
Zartan
![]() Join Date: July 18, 2001
Location: America, On The Beautiful Earth
Age: 52
Posts: 5,373
|
Just comparing the writings on the website above and the quotes Johnny posted on the Koran and contradictions are evident. On one hand non-believers are to be treated decently on the other violently.
Here is the webpage I copied this short list of bible contradictions from verbatim, but I added bold to make the individual instances of contradiction stand-out. BTW- I am utterly convinced the bible is full of contradictions, so any rebuttals aimed at making me change my mind better be good, reeeeeaaal good. ![]() http://www.ffrf.org/lfif/contra.html Quote:
__________________
Support Local Music and Record Stores! Got Liberty? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#169 |
Very Mad Bird
![]() Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Breukelen (over the river from New Amsterdam)
Age: 53
Posts: 9,246
|
Nice cut and paste job Chewbacca. You haven't even read the passages concerned.
I don't have the time to go through each and every point tonight. I'm off to bed. But considering the starting line was handled about as correctly as a dropped glass..... See below: New International Version Exodus 20 13"You shall not murder. New American Standard Bible Exodus 20 13"You shall not murder. The Message Exodus 20 13 No murder AMP Exodus 20 13You shall not commit murder. NLT Exodus 20 13"Do not murder. KJV Exodus 20 13 Thou shalt not kill. ESV Exodus 20 13"You shall not murder. CEV Exodus 20 13Do not murder. New King James Version Exodus 20 13"You shall not murder. YLT Exodus 20 13`Thou dost not murder. ASV Exodus 20 13 Thou shalt not kill. ----------------- Nine out of these eleven translations translated the Hebrew into Do Not MURDER. Additionally, the commandments were for ISRAEL not for GOD to follow. They were the humans end of the deal. God's part of the bargain was to be Israel's God. Considering this is just the first point, I'm out. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#170 |
Very Mad Bird
![]() Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Breukelen (over the river from New Amsterdam)
Age: 53
Posts: 9,246
|
Actually I found this written by Mr Baker:
---- All of the above contradictions have been carefully studied, and when necessary the original languages have been consulted. Although it is always scholarly to consider the original languages, why should that be necessary with the "word of God?" An omnipotent, omniscient deity should have made his all-important message unmistakably clear to everyone, everywhere, at all times. No one should have to learn an extinct language to get God's message, especially an ancient language about which there is much scholarly disagreement. If the English translation is flawed or imprecise, then God failed to get his point across to English speakers. A true fundamentalist should consider the English version of the bible to be just as inerrant as the original because if we admit that human error was possible in the translation, then it was equally possible in the original writing. (Some fundamentalists do assert that the King James Version is perfect. One preacher reportedly said, "If the King James Version was good enough for the Apostle Paul, then it's good enough for me.") If a contradiction exists in English, then the bible is contradictory. ---- Three problems with this line of thinking. 1. He is prescribing "what should be" onto Gods actions. One humans "what should be" is anothers "what shouldn't". He should just stick to dealing with what is because: 2. Christianity is a relationship. Divergent opinions and interpretations are PROOF of free thinking, and an alive interractive relationship that transcends personal bias. How a person views an object is entirely dependent on the direction they are facing. Where he sees discord, I see strong relationships covering many bases. He sees denominations as a flaw, I see them as a wonderful strength. I woudl hate to see complete uniformity of belief withing Christianity. It would indicate mind control. 3. He's ignoring Rhema. The spoken word. The written and the spoken need to be in harmony with each other. Much as he protests, the original language IS important. More importantly, is how the bible speaks to the INDIVIDUAL at their time of distress and need. Anyhow, I'll post more later. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Soundset volume | ElfBane | Baldurs Gate & Tales of the Sword Coast | 1 | 12-11-2004 11:37 AM |
N.S. allows same-sex marriages | pritchke | General Discussion | 28 | 10-04-2004 09:27 AM |
Same sex marriages. Your opinion? | Sir Kenyth | General Discussion | 250 | 08-08-2003 03:41 PM |
Need Help With Volume Formulae! | DJG | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 6 | 12-15-2002 10:17 AM |
a romantic opinon poll | Madman-Rogovich | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 20 | 07-16-2002 01:58 PM |