real time?turn based?

BaRoN NiGhT · 07-25-2003, 09:36 AM

which type of game do u like?
i prefer real time so bad!!!

---------------------------

Gabrielles blades · 07-25-2003, 11:01 AM

theyre both good depending on what it is your playing
i wouldnt want a first person shooter turn based for instance (quake type)
and i wouldnt want a strategic conquest game to be real time (moo type)

BaRoN NiGhT · 07-25-2003, 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gabrielles blades:
theyre both good depending on what it is your playing
i wouldnt want a first person shooter turn based for instance (quake type)
and i wouldnt want a strategic conquest game to be real time (moo type)

but usually a first time shooter is put in a real time game, and a strategic conquest game is also usually put in a turn based game.i just cant imagine why a game company would put a strategy game in a real time game.

--------------------------

9_1_6 · 07-25-2003, 11:56 AM

Depends on the game really.
Usually, I prefer Real Time.

Xen · 07-25-2003, 04:04 PM

Real time.

Kakero · 07-25-2003, 06:49 PM

I like both depends on what game it is.

testing : Saudara betul betul dari Indonesia? Apa Khabar?

Azimaith · 07-25-2003, 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gabrielles blades:
theyre both good depending on what it is your playing
i wouldnt want a first person shooter turn based for instance (quake type)
and i wouldnt want a strategic conquest game to be real time (moo type)

How the heck can you have a turn based shooter??? Starcraft wouldn't be the same turn based.

Masklinn · 07-25-2003, 07:32 PM

Turn based is real strategy. Real Time is just click faster to win. Think about it.

Wulfere · 07-25-2003, 07:39 PM

I much prefer turn based, especially for RPG's where you are running multiple characters, with different action options for each. Real time should be for games like Freelancer and Mechwarrior. I know folks who won't play anything that isn't turn based.

I agree with Masklinn.

Nerull · 07-25-2003, 10:21 PM

Real time is great for the time in between fights; you are just telling people to move around, pick up stuff, etc. But turn based is the best when you are controlling mulitple characters in a combat. Let's face it, how many people played any of the Baldur's Gate games without hitting pause to give commands to your party? Once you hit pause, give commands, and they do the commands once you unpause, it is a rudimentary version of the turn based system in action. I loved playing the original Dune game (I believe Sega Genesis, if I remember right), but it was also annoying that all commands were given in real time. The computer could have all of his men move all at once, while I was stuck rushing around the map giving commands, all the while his guys moving around and attacking my guys. I'd be off on another part of the map trying to organize my people, then I would hear "base under attack." Go back, and he's got like 5 units there pounding on my base. Once I had my guys organized, and had enough forces in place to guard my stuff, then I could concentrate on my attacking force, and could keep a strong enough tabs on things to fight in real time. There's no way I would even think of playing BG2 without hitting pause at least a couple of times in the combat.

Personally, I prefer turned based, especially considering that is what I grew up with (I'll date myself by throwing out Bard's Tale and the original Pool of Radiance on my Commodore 64...). Gives you time to think and prepare strategy. That's why I'm looking forward to Temple of Elemental Evil.

07-25-2003, 11:56 AM	#4
9_1_6 Elminster Join Date: November 2, 2002 Location: ♣♣♣ Age: 39 Posts: 457	Depends on the game really. Usually, I prefer Real Time. __________________ <img border=\"0\" alt=\"[dancing]\" title=\"\" src=\"graemlins/dancing.gif\" /> <img border=\"0\" alt=\"[dancing]\" title=\"\" src=\"graemlins/dancing.gif\" /> 9_1_6 <img border=\"0\" alt=\"[dancing]\" title=\"\" src=\"graemlins/dancing.gif\" /> <img border=\"0\" alt=\"[dancing]\" title=\"\" src=\"graemlins/dancing.gif\" /> <br />LIQUID STICK PEOPLE!

07-25-2003, 07:32 PM	#8
Masklinn Avatar Join Date: January 12, 2003 Location: Paris, France Age: 45 Posts: 594	Turn based is real strategy. Real Time is just click faster to win. Think about it. __________________ <br /><br />-=roaar=-

07-25-2003, 10:21 PM	#10
Nerull Lord Ao Join Date: May 17, 2001 Location: San Antonio, Texas, USA Age: 54 Posts: 2,069	Real time is great for the time in between fights; you are just telling people to move around, pick up stuff, etc. But turn based is the best when you are controlling mulitple characters in a combat. Let's face it, how many people played any of the Baldur's Gate games without hitting pause to give commands to your party? Once you hit pause, give commands, and they do the commands once you unpause, it is a rudimentary version of the turn based system in action. I loved playing the original Dune game (I believe Sega Genesis, if I remember right), but it was also annoying that all commands were given in real time. The computer could have all of his men move all at once, while I was stuck rushing around the map giving commands, all the while his guys moving around and attacking my guys. I'd be off on another part of the map trying to organize my people, then I would hear "base under attack." Go back, and he's got like 5 units there pounding on my base. Once I had my guys organized, and had enough forces in place to guard my stuff, then I could concentrate on my attacking force, and could keep a strong enough tabs on things to fight in real time. There's no way I would even think of playing BG2 without hitting pause at least a couple of times in the combat. Personally, I prefer turned based, especially considering that is what I grew up with (I'll date myself by throwing out Bard's Tale and the original Pool of Radiance on my Commodore 64...). Gives you time to think and prepare strategy. That's why I'm looking forward to Temple of Elemental Evil. __________________ [img]\"ubb/noncgi/smiles/new/ghoul.gif\" alt=\" - \" /><br /><br />\"The middle class pays all of the taxes, does all of the work.<br />The lower class exists just to scare the middle class.\"<br />-George Carlin

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
RPG-Turn based games	grolim	General Discussion	14	09-03-2005 12:27 AM
Turn based	grolim	Baldurs Gate II: Shadows of Amn & Throne of Bhaal	2	09-02-2005 11:32 AM
Turn-Based	robo donkey	Neverwinter Nights 1 & 2 Also SoU & HotU Forum	1	03-12-2002 01:36 PM
Still need help with turn based	mgdorsey	Wizards & Warriors Forum	4	06-02-2001 02:18 PM
How can i get turn-based	mgdorsey	Wizards & Warriors Forum	2	06-01-2001 11:26 AM

07-25-2003, 09:36 AM	#1
BaRoN NiGhT Avatar Join Date: June 16, 2003 Location: Home Posts: 536	which type of game do u like? i prefer real time so bad!!! ---------------------------

07-25-2003, 11:01 AM	#2
Gabrielles blades Baaz Draconian Join Date: April 26, 2002 Location: florida Age: 43 Posts: 761	theyre both good depending on what it is your playing i wouldnt want a first person shooter turn based for instance (quake type) and i wouldnt want a strategic conquest game to be real time (moo type)

07-25-2003, 04:04 PM	#5
Xen Symbol of Moradin Join Date: June 5, 2002 Location: Slovenia,Ljubljana Age: 37 Posts: 8,554	Real time.

07-25-2003, 06:49 PM	#6
Kakero 40th Level Warrior Join Date: March 24, 2002 Posts: 10,215	I like both depends on what game it is. testing : Saudara betul betul dari Indonesia? Apa Khabar?

07-25-2003, 07:39 PM	#9
Wulfere Red Wizard of Thay Join Date: March 20, 2001 Location: Lincoln, Nebraska USA Age: 64 Posts: 893	I much prefer turn based, especially for RPG's where you are running multiple characters, with different action options for each. Real time should be for games like Freelancer and Mechwarrior. I know folks who won't play anything that isn't turn based. I agree with Masklinn.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)