Visit the Ironworks Gaming Website Email the Webmaster Graphics Library Rules and Regulations Help Support Ironworks Forum with a Donation to Keep us Online - We rely totally on Donations from members Donation goal Meter

Ironworks Gaming Radio

Ironworks Gaming Forum

Go Back   Ironworks Gaming Forum > Ironworks Gaming Forums > General Discussion > General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005)
FAQ Calendar Arcade Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-08-2002, 09:49 PM   #1
flibulzbuth
Drow Warrior
 

Join Date: April 6, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 254
Howdy!

My old voodoo 5500 has just deceased for unknown reasons (RIP, darling ).
Luckily, my shop warranty is still effective and will, hopefully, be able to replace it with another card of more or less the same value. Meanwhile, i'm stucked with an old ATI rage.

I'll probably get the choice between these 4 cards (these are the one the shop are ofering on its website that are in comparable price range):

-Radeon 8500 LE, ATI
-Xtasy GeForce 4 MX440, Visiontek
-All-in-Wonder Radeon 7500, ATI
-GeForce 4 Ti4200, XFX.

The last one is obviously more expensive. I'm leaning toward the 2 GF4. Is it really worth it to pay 50$ more to get a normal (not MX) GF4?

Do you know anything about XFX? Is it a reliable company? I read some excellent reviews of it on the net, but i though i might ask here.

Anyway, any tip is more than welcome.
__________________
Boo for president!
flibulzbuth is offline  
Old 11-08-2002, 10:15 PM   #2
NiceWorg
Baaz Draconian
 

Join Date: January 15, 2002
Location: Vaasa, Finland
Age: 43
Posts: 772
Well I read somewhere that MX cards are usually 1/4 slower. That depends of the card of course, and varies a lot. I think it´s worth 50 bucks, if you use it a lot.
__________________
Fell in love with a country girl, morning sunshine<br />She was up from a nether world, just to bust another soul<br />[url]\"http://jarkokson.suddenlaunch.com\" target=\"_blank\">Click!</a>
NiceWorg is offline  
Old 11-08-2002, 11:28 PM   #3
The Hunter of Jahanna
Emerald Dragon
 

Join Date: September 25, 2001
Location: NY , NY
Age: 64
Posts: 960
An MX card is basicaly an old GeForce 2 card with a new chip in it. Kind of like putting a pentium 4 into an atari 2600. The GeForce Ti cards on the other hand have been totaly redone to take total advantage of the faster chip. Radeon makes good cards but there have been some compatability problems with newer games like Neverwinter Nights. If you are going to go with a Raedeon card , why not get one of the new 9000's. It is supposed to be the current king of all videocards, having only just recently been released.
__________________
\"How much do I love you?? I\'ll tell you one thing, it\'d be a whole hell of a lot more if you stopped nagging me and made me a friggin sandwich.\"
The Hunter of Jahanna is offline  
Old 11-08-2002, 11:32 PM   #4
Animal
Gold Dragon
 

Join Date: March 29, 2002
Location: Canada
Age: 52
Posts: 2,534
Stay away from MX cards. They're just glorified Geforce 2 with no Pixel Shaders or DX8 support. The GF4 Ti4200 is good card and can overclock to Ti4600 speeds. IF you want awesome performance the ATI 9700 is the king right now, but nVidia is due to release a new chip soon. I'd go with the Ti4200 myself. You should get at least a year out of it before needing to upgrade again.
__________________
It\'s all fun and games until somebody loses an eye...then it becomes a sport.<br /> [img]\"http://members.shaw.ca/mtholdings/bsmeter.gif\" alt=\" - \" />
Animal is offline  
Old 11-08-2002, 11:44 PM   #5
flibulzbuth
Drow Warrior
 

Join Date: April 6, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 254
A year out of a Ti 4200??? I Hoped for more. [img]smile.gif[/img]

I've checked the ATI 9000 being in my price range. They seem excellent cards, but they are not officially win98SE compatible, only winME and up. Since i won't be able to upgrade my OS, i'll have to stick with Nvidia or older ATI.

From what i saw (benchmarks, reviews, this thread), i think i'll stay away from the MX. So the Ti4200 is pretty much the best bet. The XFX is pretty sexy too with it's chrome-covered fan, almost looks like a porsche [img]tongue.gif[/img] .

Thanks all for the input.
__________________
Boo for president!
flibulzbuth is offline  
Old 11-08-2002, 11:53 PM   #6
True_Moose
Gold Dragon
 

Join Date: June 18, 2002
Location: Wolfville, NS / Calgary, AB
Age: 38
Posts: 2,563
Well consider this...I emailed id, and my G4Ti4200 should be sufficient to run Doom III at at least 1024x768 resolution. Fine by me.
__________________
[img]\"http://i44.photobucket.com/albums/f13/true_moose/Siggy.jpg\" alt=\" - \" />
True_Moose is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How good is this graphic card? Kakero General Discussion 9 10-16-2005 04:52 PM
Graphic card ? Blind_Prophet General Discussion 2 09-17-2005 07:10 PM
Desperately need Graphic card advice! slicer15 General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) 22 01-12-2004 09:14 AM
Which graphic card should I purchase? GokuZool General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) 16 04-20-2002 06:45 AM
What graphic card manufacturer? Ezekial General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) 19 02-10-2002 05:01 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2024 Ironworks Gaming & ©2024 The Great Escape Studios TM - All Rights Reserved