04-08-2005, 09:08 AM | #1 | ||
Takhisis Follower
Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Mandurah, West Australia
Age: 60
Posts: 5,073
|
I have reproduced the article in my daily paper in full, but re-ordered some of the paragraphs to better sequence the story.
Quote:
Quote:
How many that stuck up for the role of the husband (like me) in making the decision on that last case would stand up for the role of the husband in this case? To me I feel that custody should be taken from him on the basis of the current legal prosecution involving the severe injury to his spouse. Even if the parents are then awarded custody (for want of a better term) and decide to maintain her hold on life, the prosecution should still be upgraded to murder anyway, because this pathetic twosome have killed her in every detail other than a heartbeat. [ 04-08-2005, 09:10 AM: Message edited by: Davros ]
__________________
Davros was right - just ask JD |
||
04-08-2005, 12:38 PM | #2 |
40th Level Warrior
Join Date: July 11, 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 11,916
|
Temporary custody should be taken away until his guilt is proven. However, there should be an order against the new custodian preventing any decision on ending her life during the period of temporary custody. IMO.
Of course, that would preclude trying him for murder. He'd be convicted of attempted murder. Then, you can pull the plug. It's a legal question as to whether you could then try him for the murder or increase the sentence. Here you would have to address double jeopardy issues. Over there I'm not familiar with how it would work. |
04-08-2005, 04:06 PM | #3 |
Drow Priestess
Join Date: March 13, 2001
Location: a hidden sanctorum high above the metroplex
Age: 54
Posts: 4,037
|
Would double jeopardy apply? "Murder" and "attempted murder" are two different charges....
If he is suspected of having some involvement with the circumstances that placed her in this situation then hold an inquest and remove him as legal guardian temporarily, as Timber suggests.
__________________
Everything may be explained by a conspiracy theory. All conspiracy theories are true. No matter how thinly you slice it, it's still bologna. |
04-20-2005, 12:29 AM | #4 |
Dracolisk
Join Date: November 1, 2002
Location: Australia ..... G\'day!
Posts: 6,123
|
This is why we need judges to interpret the law; legislation alone can never cover every aspect.
I cant see why a charge of kidnapping or assault causing ABH can not be used first to get the man behind bars and the 'care' of Mrs Korp then transferred to the state or next of kin. As for murder charges that would be tough. I suspect that they will just face conspiracy to murder and or attempted murder. A good judge will take pre meditation into account and hopefully they will get 20 years each. [ 04-20-2005, 12:31 AM: Message edited by: wellard ]
__________________
fossils - natures way of laughing at creationists for over 3 billion years |
05-02-2005, 08:16 AM | #5 |
Dracolisk
Join Date: November 1, 2002
Location: Australia ..... G\'day!
Posts: 6,123
|
I believe that the state has been awarded 'control' with a view to terminateing her life / existance.
I just heard on the radio so no links sorry
__________________
fossils - natures way of laughing at creationists for over 3 billion years |
05-02-2005, 08:56 AM | #6 |
Avatar
Join Date: April 18, 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Age: 48
Posts: 549
|
I believe these things are interpreted differently from country to country. In this case it seems that the prosecution will be able to demonstrate an intent to kill Mrs Korp beyond reasonable doubt and as such it is not unlikely that the verdict will be guilty.
However if Mrs Korp dies and it can be prooven that she died _only_ as a result of the injuries suffered due to the assault there will be another (brief) trial for murder. In case this happens before the first trial the charge will most likely be upgraded. There is no such thing as "Almost succesful murder". That is not a question of guilt, but sanction. I expect that there is great variation in the sanctions that can be given for attempted murder. The actual sanction is usually based on precedense. In case of very severe attacks with serious and permanent consequences the sanction is usually very severe almost as much as murder itself. I serve as juror on a 4-year term and have been in a panel in a case such as this. However my vow of silence forbids me from discussing that even cursory. EDIT: Minor typos [ 05-02-2005, 10:45 AM: Message edited by: mad=dog ]
__________________
[url]\"http://www.dsr.kvl.dk/~maddog/isur.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Ooooookay. I surrender.</a><br />Sometimes I get the eerie feeling that my computer is operating me and not the other way around. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New twist on an old bug... | Bungleau | Wizards & Warriors Forum | 5 | 07-28-2006 10:07 AM |
Police State? | Son of Osiris | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 7 | 12-23-2003 08:56 AM |
Kuirosan battle with a twist | Sever | Baldurs Gate II: Shadows of Amn & Throne of Bhaal | 9 | 01-07-2003 07:34 PM |
Romance twist?-spoiler | Silver | Baldurs Gate II: Shadows of Amn & Throne of Bhaal | 10 | 06-28-2002 05:45 PM |
The new twist on Zelda. | Tenk | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 30 | 11-13-2001 10:36 AM |