Italian police foiled a terrorist plot to bomb London

[Ziroc]

http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2003032189,00.html

I know it's 'The Sun', but a lot of their stories are truth (atleast about security matters) ... one hopes.

[wellard]

Ziroc
Normally one should not even trust the date on the top of the sun newspaper but I think this story carries some truth as far as I can tell from other sources. But it begs the question as to why we are wasting resources looking at Iraq instead of protecting ourselves from the "clear and present danger" of terroism?

[johnny]

Originally posted by wellard: Ziroc Normally one should not even trust the date on the top of the sun newspaper but I think this story carries some truth as far as I can tell from other sources. But it begs the question as to why we are wasting resources looking at Iraq instead of protecting ourselves from the "clear and present danger" of terroism?

Maybe because their sponsors live there ? Great job from Italy's finest, i hope they lock em up and throw away the key.

[wellard]

G'day Johnny
And the link to the proof that iraq sponsers terroism is due to be posted soon?.

[B_part]

As far as i can tell, those 5 weren't planning anything in London, but only against Nato bases, churches and italian objectives. The news here didn't mention London or any UK target. This is strange, though, because Italy is thought to be only a logistic base for terrorists to hit in other parts of Europe - which has been true so far since most of the terrorist groups which have been caught since 9/11 were just "supporters" which provided weapons, explosives etc.
As to locking them up and melting the key, I don't think it will be the case, since italian laws, like those of most western countries are far too lax against terrorism. Special laws are still a work in progress - italian parliament tends to be annoyingly slow.

[B_part]

Originally posted by wellard: G'day Johnny And the link to the proof that iraq sponsers terroism is due to be posted soon?.

Do we care if they do it or not? Saddam is a threat, and must be removed. Well, disarmed, which means removed, since he won't comply.
Anyway, it's common american-enemies policy to sponsor terrorism, no matter what their politic background is. Iraq isn't an exception.

[wellard]

Originally posted by B_part: quote: Originally posted by wellard: G'day Johnny And the link to the proof that Iraq sponsors terrorism is due to be posted soon?

Do we care if they do it or not? Saddam is a threat, and must be removed. Well, disarmed, which means removed, since he won't comply.
Anyway, it's common american-enemies policy to sponsor terrorism, no matter what their politic background is. Iraq isn't an exception.[/QUOTE]What happened to the innocent till proven guilty mantra?
And if Saddam is guilty surely there is a better way of ridding the world of evil than killing innocents?

[img]graemlins/grabblue.gif[/img]

Remember that even the Arab world (somewhat reluctantly) helped with punishing Saddams aggression against Kuwait and would (somewhat reluctantly) agree to punish again if found guilty of currant terrorism. But where is the proof?

"SHOW ME THE MONEY"

Originally posted by B_part: Do we care if they do it or not? Saddam is a threat, and must be removed. Well, disarmed, which means removed, since he won't comply. Anyway, it's common american-enemies policy to sponsor terrorism, no matter what their politic background is. Iraq isn't an exception.[/QB]

It’s common American policy to sponsor or even commit terrorism against its enemies.
For example the mujahedin in Afghanistan,
Giving Saddam all his weapons of mass destruction when he was fighting against Iran,
Mass torture and Murder by the CIA and American military in Vietnam.
Funding the Contras.
aiding the attempt to overthrow Chavez in venuzsala,
Overthrowing Allende in chile and replaceing him with a dictatorship responsible for the deaths of over 30,000 people.
Killing over 2000 afghan civilians.

It’s very hard to tell who are the real terrorists sometimes.

[B_part]

Originally posted by wellard: quote: Originally posted by B_part: quote: Originally posted by wellard: G'day Johnny And the link to the proof that Iraq sponsors terrorism is due to be posted soon?

Do we care if they do it or not? Saddam is a threat, and must be removed. Well, disarmed, which means removed, since he won't comply.
Anyway, it's common american-enemies policy to sponsor terrorism, no matter what their politic background is. Iraq isn't an exception.[/QUOTE]What happened to the innocent till proven guilty mantra?
And if Saddam is guilty surely there is a better way of ridding the world of evil than killing innocents?

[img]graemlins/grabblue.gif[/img]

Remember that even the Arab world (somewhat reluctantly) helped with punishing Saddams aggression against Kuwait and would (somewhat reluctantly) agree to punish again if found guilty of currant terrorism. But where is the proof?

"SHOW ME THE MONEY"[/QUOTE]The current war isn't against Iraq as a terrorism financer, is against Iraq as a nation not complying with UN imposition to destroy banned weapons.
Proof of what that he has weapons of mass distruction? He used them against iran and his people, I don't think he was simply trying a creative method of getting rid of theose weapons once and for all.
Where are the weapons? Somewhere around. It doesn't take much to hide let's say 50 trucks of sarin gas in a desert that big. They were able to hide the scuds during Desert Storm with hundreds of planes flying over Iraq (and mind, scuds are pretty noticeable) - they won't have trouble hiding normal trucks. Hans Blixen himself said that even a shallow inspection would take an year or so...
Anyway, they found empty shells - there is no purpose to keep artillery shells empty unless you want to fit a "special" warhead. That's the most they will ever find, in my opinion. Unless of course the attack takes place - then we will see the proofs used against us, be sure.

As to the better way than war, I really think that the diplomacy game works if all the players play with the same rules. You can convince a democratic country with diplomacy, not Saddam.

P.S. There is a dedicated forum to this topic at the bottom of the Ironworks main page... maybe that's the place to discuss

[ 01-24-2003, 06:36 AM: Message edited by: B_part ]

[wellard]

[quote]Originally posted by B_part:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by wellard:
[qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by B_part:
[qb]

Originally posted by wellard: [qb] As to the better way than war, I really think that the diplomacy game works if all the players play with the same rules. You can convince a democratic country with diplomacy, not Saddam. P.S. There is a dedicated forum to this topic at the bottom of the Ironworks main page... maybe that's the place to discuss

heard this link mentioned before.... but when I went to the gaming forums page i saw nothing. Thankyou for giving me more detailed directions.

does Ziroc have a minimum iq entry level for this ironworks thing?

[img]graemlins/blush.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/blush.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/blush.gif[/img]