09-22-2003, 01:34 AM | #1 |
Very Mad Bird
Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Breukelen (over the river from New Amsterdam)
Age: 52
Posts: 9,246
|
Not bad for the most verified work in existence:
http://channels.netscape.com/ns/news...biblicaltunnel Part of the Old Testament Proven True Read 2 Kings 20:20 and 2 Chronicles 32:30 in the Old Testament and you'll find a reference to a tunnel that was built in 700 B.C. by order of King Hezekiah to protect Jerusalem's water supply against an Assyrian siege. Long considered an engineering feat for that day and age, the serpentine tunnel ran 1,750 feet long and moved water from the Gihon spring across the entire city of ancient Jerusalem to the pool of Siloam. Fast forward to modern-day Jerusalem. The Siloam Tunnel in that city matches the biblical description of King Hezekiah's tunnel. But is it really the same one? That question has stumped scholars for years, many of whom insisted the Siloam Tunnel was built centuries later than the Bible suggested in Kings and Chronicles. The only clue that survived for more than 2,700 years is an inscription discovered in 1880 on a tunnel wall that supported the link to King Hezekiah, although it did not name him specifically, reports The Associated Press. Now geologists from the Cave Research Center at Hebrew University in Jerusalem think they have solved the mystery. By using radiocarbon testing to analyze the age of stalactite samples from the ceiling of the Siloam Tunnel and plant material recovered from its plaster floor, the biblical record and the tunnel's age have been confirmed, the researchers wrote in the journal Nature. The Siloam Tunnel is the one built by King Hezekiah. This is also significant because it is the first time that a well-identified biblical structure has been subjected to extensive radiocarbon dating. Even with all our modern-day technology and scientific knowledge, very little testing of biblical structures has been done to prove or disprove their age or authenticity. Why? The experts told AP such testing is difficult because it's often hard to identify such structures, they may be poorly preserved, or they may be restricted for various political or religious reasons. The Siloam Tunnel is different. It's long been a tourist attraction. Anyone can wander in it and see the pick marks the original builders made in the walls to adjust their course so the tunnel would meet with a second team of workers who were heading toward them from the opposite end of the city. AP notes that those pick marks tell us how difficult it was to connect the two ends of the tunnel. "The tunnel is extraordinary, but these guys didn't know where they were going a lot of the time," Hershel Shanks, an expert on the history of Jerusalem who writes for the Biblical Archaeology Review, told AP. Still, he added, "It's nice to have scientific confirmation for what the vast majority of biblical scholars and archaeologists believe." |
09-22-2003, 02:26 AM | #2 |
Ironworks Moderator
Join Date: June 27, 2001
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Age: 43
Posts: 6,763
|
I don't see what's so special about this. I don't think people have problem accepting the setting of the old testament, I think the thing that need to be proven is a lot different...
[ 09-22-2003, 02:27 AM: Message edited by: Luvian ]
__________________
Once upon a time in Canada... |
09-22-2003, 02:48 AM | #3 |
Symbol of Cyric
Join Date: March 28, 2003
Location: Australia
Age: 37
Posts: 1,124
|
many parts of the old testament have been proven it has even been proven that a person named Jesus existed as in the one written about in the bible, wheather he was the son of God is not known.
|
09-22-2003, 03:10 AM | #4 |
Thoth - Egyptian God of Wisdom
Join Date: May 10, 2002
Location: Dunedin, New Zealand.
Age: 42
Posts: 2,860
|
Well, I think it's a nice find. It's always pleasant when your hypothesis matches with hard evidence.
Yet it's somewhat funny how christian scientists view radiocarbon dating as all well and good when it supports the structure of their church and beliefs, yet is viewed as frivolous and transitory when applied to theories of evolution. [ 09-22-2003, 03:11 AM: Message edited by: The Hierophant ]
__________________
[img]\"hosted/Hierophant.jpg\" alt=\" - \" /><br />Strewth! |
09-22-2003, 04:03 AM | #5 |
Jack Burton
Join Date: May 15, 2001
Location: The Netherlands
Age: 39
Posts: 5,888
|
I agree with Luvian here. I'd like to add though, that the Bible we know today is totally different from the one we knew in the Middle Ages (to name an example). Things have been changed so thoroughly that IMHO you still cannot trust these kinda facts.
|
09-22-2003, 06:01 AM | #6 | |
Takhisis Follower
Join Date: April 30, 2001
Location: szép Magyarország (well not right now)
Posts: 5,089
|
Quote:
Anyway, thanks for posting this Yorick, nice to hear about things like this. [ 09-22-2003, 06:01 AM: Message edited by: Vaskez ] |
|
09-22-2003, 06:21 AM | #7 | |
Ma'at - Goddess of Truth & Justice
Join Date: October 29, 2001
Location: North Carolina
Age: 61
Posts: 3,257
|
Quote:
Tit for Tat.
__________________
[img]\"http://img.ranchoweb.com/images/cerek/cerektsrsig.jpg\" alt=\" - \" /><br />Cerek the Calmth |
|
09-22-2003, 06:55 AM | #8 | |
Symbol of Cyric
Join Date: March 28, 2003
Location: Australia
Age: 37
Posts: 1,124
|
Quote:
|
|
09-22-2003, 07:37 AM | #9 | |
Apophis
Join Date: July 10, 2001
Location: By a big blue lake, Canada
Age: 50
Posts: 4,628
|
Quote:
On the other hand I really don't see what this proves. So Jerusalem existed 700BC. Is that news? [img]graemlins/confused2.gif[/img] [ 09-22-2003, 07:38 AM: Message edited by: WillowIX ]
__________________
Confuzzled by nature. |
|
09-22-2003, 07:49 AM | #10 |
Thoth - Egyptian God of Wisdom
Join Date: May 10, 2002
Location: Dunedin, New Zealand.
Age: 42
Posts: 2,860
|
Whew, bit of a strong reaction to what I posted, maybe I should have taken more time to clarify my thoughts, anyway, here goes...
Maybe these things differ from region to region (what am I saying, of course they do), but where I live there are numerous christian lobbysist who dismiss the theory of evolution and want to have it banned from schools (and considering religious studies has ben removed from the curriculum I guess that may be fair enough). A main criticism that these lobbyists offer is that carbon dating cannot be irrefutably ratified, and thus evolution is not based upon fact, and thus should not be taught in the public curriculum. Now I'm not agreeing, nor disagreeing with that statement, just relaying it on [img]smile.gif[/img] I never said evolution was scientific fact, I never even said that I believe it myself (but I do). I don't want to start a religious debate and I apologise if what I said detracted from the core of the thread. I only said that it can be amusing to see how some people hold particular data in a positive light when it says what they want it to say, and ignore/debunk it when it 'disagrees' with their hypotheses.
__________________
[img]\"hosted/Hierophant.jpg\" alt=\" - \" /><br />Strewth! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Deport her to America!(proven to be false, but still funny anyway) | Stormymystic | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 38 | 09-08-2004 03:50 PM |
Guilthy until proven innocent?! | Dreamer128 | General Discussion | 5 | 12-28-2003 01:27 PM |
Demons of the Old Testament | Azimaith | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 12 | 09-25-2003 01:15 PM |
The Brick Testament | Spelca | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 4 | 05-12-2003 02:59 PM |
my theory has been proven! | SSJ4Sephiroth | Baldurs Gate II: Shadows of Amn & Throne of Bhaal | 2 | 08-13-2001 07:33 AM |