Visit the Ironworks Gaming Website Email the Webmaster Graphics Library Rules and Regulations Help Support Ironworks Forum with a Donation to Keep us Online - We rely totally on Donations from members Donation goal Meter

Ironworks Gaming Radio

Ironworks Gaming Forum

Go Back   Ironworks Gaming Forum > Ironworks Gaming Forums > General Discussion
FAQ Calendar Arcade Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-26-2001, 12:28 AM   #51
Liliara
Red Wizard of Thay
 

Join Date: August 17, 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 874
Quote:
Originally posted by Bullvye:
Liliara, I too think that we should be weary of the Northern Alliance. But also I believe the success of our operations in Afghanistan will have a political determination not a military one. Our "end", in Afghanistan will not be found by the death of Al Queda, or the Taliban. Only when a legitimate government can be put in place, will we see the close of the Afghan chapter on the "War on Terrorism" then what?....Iraq is next!......Wanna make a bet?

I agree that Iraq is next. However, when we DO succeed in overturning the Taliban, if the new government of Afghanistan mess up in the future, it will be forever perceived as 'America's screw up'. No one will remember the faults of the Taliban. This is the problem I have. Everyone wants a better world, but when it's messed up, everyone looks around for someone to blame. Usually, since America is on the frontline, trying to right the wrongs, it falls back on us.



------------------

Captain of Bouncers, Boogre Bar

LH Member


"I've had it up to here, listening to a small segment of people try to put down America! America's the greatest land on Earth, and we oughta be proud of what we have! I'm proud of America, I'm proud of our people, and I'm gonna prove it. We're American and DAMN proud of it! Frankly I'm getting a little ticked off...go ta ****"... Dink (if anyone knows who originally said this, please let me know!)
Liliara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2001, 12:42 AM   #52
Bullvye
Dungeon Master
 

Join Date: September 27, 2001
Location: West Palm Beach, Fl
Posts: 66
Quote:
Originally posted by Liliara:
I agree that Iraq is next. However, when we DO succeed in overturning the Taliban, if the new government of Afghanistan mess up in the future, it will be forever perceived as 'America's screw up'. No one will remember the faults of the Taliban. This is the problem I have. Everyone wants a better world, but when it's messed up, everyone looks around for someone to blame. Usually, since America is on the frontline, trying to right the wrongs, it falls back on us.

We are Americans!.....and we are damn good at war! Lets just hope and pray that our leaders have studied their history and don't make the same mistakes we've made in the past! To hell with what people think! We have the entire world( except 3 or 4 nations) behind us! Once a new government is in place, its their duty to maintain peace and not harbor known terrorist groups! If they don't......they deserve what they get!

------------------



I'm not BAD,.....but the BAD don't mess with me!"
Bullvye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2001, 01:01 AM   #53
John D Harris
Ninja Storm Shadow
 

Join Date: March 27, 2001
Location: Northport,Alabama, USA
Age: 63
Posts: 3,577
I'm not that worried about the Northern Alliance, It's the Pakistanis that I worry more about. Even though we have the Pakistanis by the short hairs (they NEED us, they need allies in their squable with India). If I remember correctly it was the Pakistanis that had the armor support, in place for our S.F. in Somalia. They took their sweet time, and cost us 18 people, mark my words watch'em.

------------------
Crustiest of the OLD COOTS
Airline ticket to Afghanistan $800
High powered rifle with scope $1000
Hotel room with roof access $100
A clean Head shot on that sack of Horse Manure Usuma Bin Laden PRICELESS!
John D Harris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2001, 05:51 AM   #54
Ryanamur
Fzoul Chembryl
 

Join Date: March 29, 2001
Location: Montréal, Canada
Age: 50
Posts: 1,763
Quote:
Originally posted by Bullvye:
We are Americans!.....and we are damn good at war! Lets just hope and pray that our leaders have studied their history and don't make the same mistakes we've made in the past! To hell with what people think! We have the entire world( except 3 or 4 nations) behind us! Once a new government is in place, its their duty to maintain peace and not harbor known terrorist groups! If they don't......they deserve what they get!

Hahaha studied history!!! You're talking about a guy who thinks he didn't live in the same century as World War II ... sorry, if it wasn't for Powell, we'd be doomed


------------------
I'm the Wanderer without a clan... I bring justice without favorism. Though you may not agree with it, my judgement is final... and inconsequential
Ryanamur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2001, 07:14 AM   #55
Fljotsdale
Thoth - Egyptian God of Wisdom
 

Join Date: March 12, 2001
Location: Birmingham, West Mid\'s, England
Age: 88
Posts: 2,859
Quote:
Originally posted by Liliara:
I too, question our allies. After all, we are supporting the Northern Alliance for a good cause. If they turn into disgusting monsters like the Taliban did, it will be America's fault just like it was when bin Laden became an evil monster. (We save our troops by helping a front that wants the same thing that we do and we are forever responsible for them in some's eyes. Kind of like the ancient thought that if you save a man's life you are responsible for it) No matter what you do, you will be condemned.
Hey, Liliara!? We agree about something, lol!
If I recall correctly, the Afghani population in general were never that keen on the people who are now 'the Northern Alliance' and I think they don't want THEM any more than they want the Taliban. They really will not be any better, imo.
I don't have any answers to this problem though. The Afghanis need free and fair elections, but how to set up such a system? And who would offer themselves for election anyway? You'd need to be pretty brave to stand for election against the Taliban and the NA! They'd both be quite capable of shooting you or dosing your breakfast with anthrax, imo.

------------------


Here be Dragons!
Proud to be Dubbed Queen of the Illuminati by Diogenes.

"If I say something to you and it can be taken two ways, and one of those ways upsets you...I meant the other one."
Fljotsdale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2001, 07:22 AM   #56
Ryanamur
Fzoul Chembryl
 

Join Date: March 29, 2001
Location: Montréal, Canada
Age: 50
Posts: 1,763
Quote:
Originally posted by Fljotsdale:
Hey, Liliara!? We agree about something, lol!
If I recall correctly, the Afghani population in general were never that keen on the people who are now 'the Northern Alliance' and I think they don't want THEM any more than they want the Taliban. They really will not be any better, imo.
I don't have any answers to this problem though. The Afghanis need free and fair elections, but how to set up such a system? And who would offer themselves for election anyway? You'd need to be pretty brave to stand for election against the Taliban and the NA! They'd both be quite capable of shooting you or dosing your breakfast with anthrax, imo.

I agree with you both. The NA alliance is no better. Personnally, I don't see any problems with the Talibans that would not occur with the NA. There are too many tribes in Afghanistan to hope to have good and liked governement in place. I personnally think that in situation like this dictatorship happens to be the way to go to keep a nation going. For those in doubt, see Tito in Yougoslavia. The guy was harsh but the country did run somewhat smoothly. The problem is that we have to find a dictator that 1- will not commit genocide 2- will repect the west and 3- that will be accepted by the greater population. It's sad, but if the country has any hopes for peace, that's the way it will have to go.

BTW: I'm not too worried about the Tali or the NA having Anthrax. They're not terrorists but they'd be more than happy to shoot you though!


------------------
I'm the Wanderer without a clan... I bring justice without favorism. Though you may not agree with it, my judgement is final... and inconsequential

[This message has been edited by Ryanamur (edited 10-26-2001).]
Ryanamur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2001, 07:36 AM   #57
Ziroc
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by Ryanamur:
The NA alliance is no better. Personnally, I don't see any problems with the Talibans that would not occur with the NA.
I kinda agree, but one major thing I think that would be better if the NA were in control is that they 'allow' the females to work, and have MUCH more freedom. The Taliban don't allow the female citizens to work, or even leave their homes sometimes.. And the must BEG to feed their children. That is what is so heartbreaking. And if they are seen begging sometimes, they are beaten or stoned. God...



------------------
Ziroc™
Ironworks Webmaster
www.tgeweb.com/ironworks
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2001, 08:17 AM   #58
Ryanamur
Fzoul Chembryl
 

Join Date: March 29, 2001
Location: Montréal, Canada
Age: 50
Posts: 1,763
Quote:
Originally posted by Ziroc:
I kinda agree, but one major thing I think that would be better if the NA were in control is that they 'allow' the females to work, and have MUCH more freedom. The Taliban don't allow the female citizens to work, or even leave their homes sometimes.. And the must BEG to feed their children. That is what is so heartbreaking. And if they are seen begging sometimes, they are beaten or stoned. God...

I see your point Z. But having to women work is really not the issue here. Yes, I agree, it would be nice but really, it's unconsequential.

About the feeding, I'm sorry, but I'm heartless. My point of view on this is "if you can't take care of your children, you shouldn't have children". I know that some of them were rapped and got pregnant. But lets face it, I doubt that more than 100,000 of the children would come from rape. That leaves over a million (or more) that are legitimate.

I've seen the Third world first hand and I can tell you that it's not a pretty sight. I've seen people dying in the streets; dead (and not yet dead) people being tossed into garbage trucks to make room for new people to crow the sidewalks; men and women alike being forced into prostitution; people paying a dime to have sex with someone infected with AIDS and a quarter for someone that's "clean"; people paying 75 cents to have sex with a goat rather than a woman. It's sick, it's sad, but it's not my problem and I have no intention of making it my problem!

------------------
I'm the Wanderer without a clan... I bring justice without favorism. Though you may not agree with it, my judgement is final... and inconsequential

[This message has been edited by Ryanamur (edited 10-26-2001).]
Ryanamur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2001, 10:14 AM   #59
Fljotsdale
Thoth - Egyptian God of Wisdom
 

Join Date: March 12, 2001
Location: Birmingham, West Mid\'s, England
Age: 88
Posts: 2,859
Quote:
Originally posted by Ryanamur:
I see your point Z. But having to women work is really not the issue here. Yes, I agree, it would be nice but really, it's unconsequential.

About the feeding, I'm sorry, but I'm heartless. My point of view on this is "if you can't take care of your children, you shouldn't have children". I know that some of them were rapped and got pregnant. But lets face it, I doubt that more than 100,000 of the children would come from rape. That leaves over a million (or more) that are legitimate.

I've seen the Third world first hand and I can tell you that it's not a pretty sight. I've seen people dying in the streets; dead (and not yet dead) people being tossed into garbage trucks to make room for new people to crow the sidewalks; men and women alike being forced into prostitution; people paying a dime to have sex with someone infected with AIDS and a quarter for someone that's "clean"; people paying 75 cents to have sex with a goat rather than a woman. It's sick, it's sad, but it's not my problem and I have no intention of making it my problem!

Ryanamur?! I'm stunned. I would never have expected a viewpoint like that from you!
Why?

------------------


Here be Dragons!
Proud to be Dubbed Queen of the Illuminati by Diogenes.

"If I say something to you and it can be taken two ways, and one of those ways upsets you...I meant the other one."
Fljotsdale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2001, 12:45 PM   #60
Yorick
Very Mad Bird
 

Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Breukelen (over the river from New Amsterdam)
Age: 53
Posts: 9,246
I heard the Coalition was seeking to reinstall the old King of Afgahnistan as a way of bringing order to the tribes.

------------------
Yorick is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Islamic statements condemning terror shamrock_uk General Discussion 20 11-04-2004 02:42 PM
First Islamic bank to open in UK Dreamer128 General Discussion 12 08-10-2004 06:32 PM
Attacking Iraq would intensify Islamic terrorism, not reduce it Charean General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) 20 11-05-2002 04:14 AM
How come I can never get bombs to work Strider_314 Miscellaneous Games (RPG or not) 4 01-15-2002 05:19 PM
'Twas the Month After Christmas...Subject: The Month After Christmas! Garnet FalconDance General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) 1 01-05-2002 03:14 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2024 Ironworks Gaming & ©2024 The Great Escape Studios TM - All Rights Reserved