Does he lie?

[SpiritWarrior]

Originally Posted by Felix The Assassin Not exactly... But I see you have once again ignored the message, and have attacked the author...

I disagree about attacking the author, as I find it's far more fun to attack the messenger. That way I am assured a provoked response akin to what i'm seeing here .

In other news, Kanye interrupting the president was alot worse than our nutcake Joe. Just disrespectful!

[John D Harris]

Originally Posted by SpiritWarrior It's "Bias". Shocked you aren't more familiar with the spelling.

you shouldn't be shocked I don't worry about the spelling that much I know there will always be some do gooder come along and correct it, usually the ones that try to use mispelling as point for them while being unable to refute anything else.... I got'sa give you a bone or two.

[Felix The Assassin]

Originally Posted by SpiritWarrior I disagree about attacking the author, as I find it's far more fun to attack the messenger. That way I am assured a provoked response akin to what i'm seeing here . In other news, Kanye interrupting the president was alot worse than our nutcake Joe. Just disrespectful!

Really now?

My how you have you so easily forgotten post#12!

http://www.ironworksforum.com/forum/...=101004&page=2

As far as that second comment, I have no idea what you are on.

[SpiritWarrior]

He's an exception 'cuz he's stupid.

Hey, what happend to "I post them, you decide"?

[Felix The Assassin]

That is what I'm here for, but on ocassion, some folks get off the path, and need nudging.

I mean we all enjoy your comments.

Sometimes, we even set small samples of food out for you.

However, here you have gotten away from the issue, and attacked the article, just like Nancy has trained you to do. Stay within the lines, and whatever you do, don't go outside the box. Deny, discredit the story, or the website, or the author, just don't engage in the topic. For the real real issue is the topic, and people calling it for what it is, if it smells like it, smears like it, and it comes from the White House, it must be warmed over crapola, sooner or later, the fit is going to hit the shan, and there will be a movement of people there to observe who catches it.

[SpiritWarrior]

I heard Glenn Beck is looking for a roommate.

[Felix The Assassin]

Originally Posted by SpiritWarrior I heard Glenn Beck is looking for a roommate.

I know a fellow, who knows some fellows. Shall I forward your contact info?

[SpiritWarrior]

That depends, do stuffed animals count as "fellows"?

[Chewbacca]

Originally Posted by Felix The Assassin However, here you have gotten away from the issue, and attacked the article, just like Nancy has trained you to do. Stay within the lines, and whatever you do, don't go outside the box. Deny, discredit the story, or the website, or the author, just don't engage in the topic. For the real real issue is the topic, and people calling it for what it is, if it smells like it, smears like it, and it comes from the White House, it must be warmed over crapola, sooner or later, the fit is going to hit the shan, and there will be a movement of people there to observe who catches it.

What a crock. Routinely offer not much more than smoke, mirrors, and the boogie man as the topic So the act is like ya got the big secret revealing, only we are so blinded we can't see it but the day will come we'll all be PWWWNZERED? Please! It hurts to laugh this much. STOP!

An amatuer could point out the intellectuial dishonesty in the OP artticle. Smoke and mirrors job no less. Facts are there but they do not connect.

The real issue about it is...

why should I or anyone care about a question being asked, if not to find an actual answer, but to fit a politcally convient pre-concieved answer? Sounds like a method that serves the party member, but not the citizen. In other words if it smells like bullshit, I watch my step so I don't step in it.

[John D Harris]

Originally Posted by Chewbacca An amatuer could point out the intellectuial dishonesty in the OP artticle. Smoke and mirrors job no less. Facts are there but they do not connect. The real issue about it is... why should I or anyone care about a question being asked, if not to find an actual answer, but to fit a politcally convient pre-concieved answer? Sounds like a method that serves the party member, but not the citizen. In other words if it smells like bullshit, I watch my step so I don't step in it.

Then point it out, the reason to do so is to further the discussion and come to some reasonable solution... one that sure as HALE won't be found by talking about the messenger, author the website it came from, or that you don't have too. Any position that can't stand to answer questions is a weak position at best, true bullshit at worse.