What now Jacko? - Page 3

Donut · 11-24-2003, 06:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cerek the Barbaric:
In the meantime, Jackson is allowed to keep custody of his 3 biological children....a luxury that is NOT afforded to most non-celebrity individuals that are facing a second accusation of child molestation. In the "real world", DSS would have stepped in and removed ALL the children from the home and kept them from the home until the individual was found innocent by a court of law.

He's even allowed to go on holiday. Apparently he's going to Tampa with the kids!!

pritchke · 11-26-2003, 11:22 AM

A follow up story, Waco Jacko may not be guilty. What we have here is a woman who seems to win court cases against a good many people to earn money and get what she wants. I would say she makes up stories, but the law seems to believe her thus far. We had a women up here say that men raped and abused her many, many times, she was caught lying in one case, the courts went back and looked over many older cases and discovered she was lying in those too. Men had been wrongfully placed in jail, or had large sums of money taken from them, she ruined lives and a judge sentenced her to maximum time for perjury. This appears to be another one of those deceitful women who will eventually be caught. I can see someone having some beef with a few people that warrants going to court maybe a couple times in there life but when it is frequent over a small period of time I get suspicious. Maybe this woman really is telling the truth in all those cases but I think she is bending and manuipulating the law for her own purpose, and Jacko is an easy target.

Robert Lusetich, Los Angeles correspondent
November 27, 2003
The mother of the boy at the centre of the latest Michael Jackson sexual misconduct allegations was involved in a previous contentious lawsuit in which she was paid a substantial sum of money.

Janet Arvizo, 34, alleged that in 1998, she and two of her sons, including Gavin, the 13-year-old who has accused Jackson of improper behaviour, were beaten by department store security guards after the Arvizos left the store with clothes that had not been paid for.

She also alleged security guards sexually assaulted her in the store car park. Court records show that in November, 2001 JC Penney Co paid Janet Arvizo's family $US137,500 ($191,600) to settle the lawsuit.

A month before that windfall, Arvizo filed for divorce from her husband, David, whom she accused of spousal abuse and child cruelty. Police charged David Arvizo, who pleaded no contest.

But David Arvizo's lawyer, Russell Halpern, alleged yesterday the mother had lied about the abuse and had convinced her three children to support her allegations.

Both incidents occurred before Gavin Arvizo, who had leukaemia, was granted a "last wish" to meet Jackson, who paid the boy's medical bills, bought Janet Arvizo a car and gave the family a place to live.

Reports from Jackson's camp suggest Janet Arvizo concocted the child abuse allegations against the 45-year-old entertainer after Jackson told her earlier this year she would be cut off financially.

[ 11-26-2003, 11:30 AM: Message edited by: pritchke ]

Timber Loftis · 11-26-2003, 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Donut:
He's even allowed to go on holiday. Apparently he's going to Tampa with the kids!!

Groooooan.

Hey, I'm glad to hear this news about the litigous mother and how he may be innocent. Now, if this turns out to be true, will we (society) and media turn our ire toward her, or toward that obsessed cop who just seems to love his 15 minutes of fame.

11-26-2003, 11:22 AM	#22
pritchke Bastet - Egyptian Cat Goddess Join Date: September 5, 2001 Location: Calgary, AB Age: 49 Posts: 3,491	A follow up story, Waco Jacko may not be guilty. What we have here is a woman who seems to win court cases against a good many people to earn money and get what she wants. I would say she makes up stories, but the law seems to believe her thus far. We had a women up here say that men raped and abused her many, many times, she was caught lying in one case, the courts went back and looked over many older cases and discovered she was lying in those too. Men had been wrongfully placed in jail, or had large sums of money taken from them, she ruined lives and a judge sentenced her to maximum time for perjury. This appears to be another one of those deceitful women who will eventually be caught. I can see someone having some beef with a few people that warrants going to court maybe a couple times in there life but when it is frequent over a small period of time I get suspicious. Maybe this woman really is telling the truth in all those cases but I think she is bending and manuipulating the law for her own purpose, and Jacko is an easy target. Robert Lusetich, Los Angeles correspondent November 27, 2003 The mother of the boy at the centre of the latest Michael Jackson sexual misconduct allegations was involved in a previous contentious lawsuit in which she was paid a substantial sum of money. Janet Arvizo, 34, alleged that in 1998, she and two of her sons, including Gavin, the 13-year-old who has accused Jackson of improper behaviour, were beaten by department store security guards after the Arvizos left the store with clothes that had not been paid for. She also alleged security guards sexually assaulted her in the store car park. Court records show that in November, 2001 JC Penney Co paid Janet Arvizo's family $US137,500 ($191,600) to settle the lawsuit. A month before that windfall, Arvizo filed for divorce from her husband, David, whom she accused of spousal abuse and child cruelty. Police charged David Arvizo, who pleaded no contest. But David Arvizo's lawyer, Russell Halpern, alleged yesterday the mother had lied about the abuse and had convinced her three children to support her allegations. Both incidents occurred before Gavin Arvizo, who had leukaemia, was granted a "last wish" to meet Jackson, who paid the boy's medical bills, bought Janet Arvizo a car and gave the family a place to live. Reports from Jackson's camp suggest Janet Arvizo concocted the child abuse allegations against the 45-year-old entertainer after Jackson told her earlier this year she would be cut off financially. [ 11-26-2003, 11:30 AM: Message edited by: pritchke ]

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)