Dane fights for state-funded sex

[dplax]

From BBC:

A disabled Danish man is fighting for the state to pay for him to have a prostitute visit him at home. Torben Hansen, who has cerebral palsy, which severely affects his speech and mobility, believes his local authority should pay the extra charge he incurs when he hires a sex worker - because his disability means he cannot go to see them. His case is currently being considered. In Denmark, local authorities compensate disabled people for extra costs incurred because of their disability. "I want them to cover the extra expenses for the prostitutes to get here, because it's a lot more expensive getting them to come to my home rather than me going to a brothel," Mr Hansen told BBC World Service's Outlook programme. "It's a necessity for me. I can't move very well, and it's impossible for me to go there." 'Unfair' In Denmark, prostitution and other forms of sex work are not illegal so long as it is not a woman's sole means of income. Mr Hansen started seeing a prostitute after attending a course at a social centre. There, he and other disabled people were taught that if they had needs, they "could do something about it". "I had a strong desire to have sex, and I think I gained the confidence around that time to get the call girls to come to me. "Since then I've had a lot of escort girls coming to see me - but I've also had girlfriends." He had been with his last girlfriend for six months, but she died in 2003. After that, Mr Hansen began arranging for visits to begin again. He also said there had been "much research" into people in his situation, and that it had showed that not being sexually fulfilled can lead to "frustration and aggression". "It's unfair to deny people with disabilities the right to a sex life," he added. Mr Hansen said the reaction to his campaign had been "very mixed." "Most of it's been positive, but I've read some very angry letters and comments in the papers... a lot of politicians have been critical, especially women politicians against prostitution." Kristen Brosboel, a Social Democrat member of the Danish Parliament, is among those who have argued against Mr Hansen. "Obviously I recognise that he has a problem that people without a disability may not have - but I disagree with the fact that we should support his visits with a prostitute with tax money," she told Outlook. "We also spend tax money on trying to prevent prostitution, helping women out of prostitution - and we have a clear policy that this is a social problem that we want to solve. "So I think that's very much in contradiction with spending tax money on requiring prostitutes."

[ 10-05-2005, 04:15 PM: Message edited by: dplax ]

[Illumina Drathiran'ar]

His case is being considered? What a country!

::starts packing bags::

[Sir Degrader]

Wow. To think, tax payer dollars taken from my blood sweat and tears (not so much of the last, though still some) would go to pay for such a thing...

[Timber Loftis]

Yaaaaaay for Socialism!

[armageddon272]

I read a similar story in Uncle John's Book of the Dumb about a guy who had the state agree to reimburse him for the prostitutes he hires because of sex being part of his treatment. He managed to get the state to agree to reimburse him, but he had a hard time finding a prostitiute that would give a receit.

[johnny]

Originally posted by Sir Degrader: Wow. To think, tax payer dollars taken from my blood sweat and tears (not so much of the last, though still some) would go to pay for such a thing...

So where do you think it goes now then ?

[mad=dog]

Hello. I am from Denmark. You know that weird country where selling sex is legal and where we take care of people who are disabled.
I'd just like to say that this one is likely to be rejected. It is true that local authorities compensate disabled people for extra costs incurred because of their disability. However these costs must be necessary. It is not in this case and hence he will most likely not recieve any financial aid. That it is being "considered" is just another way of saying that our politicians actually work for a living.

[Timber Loftis]

Well, if sex isn't considered necessary, then you're not as liberal as I thought. [img]graemlins/heee.gif[/img]

[Sir Degrader]

Originally posted by johnny: quote: Originally posted by Sir Degrader: Wow. To think, tax payer dollars taken from my blood sweat and tears (not so much of the last, though still some) would go to pay for such a thing...

So where do you think it goes now then ? [/QUOTE]Out of $100:
50 to paying for old peoples and smoker's hospital bills.
25 for schools teaching (ha!) youngsters who for the most part don't care.
15 for a Military with sinking submarinse
10 for roads.

[mad=dog]

Originally posted by Timber Loftis: Well, if sex isn't considered necessary, then you're not as liberal as I thought. [img]graemlins/heee.gif[/img]

LOL. Actually I thought about mentioning just that. Sex can be considered necessary, but not sex from a prostetute. If for instance he had trouble getting in touch with his girlfriend he could get some compensation for transports and such. It's time for Torben Hansen to enter the dating scene once again if he wants to get laid.
A comparable situation. We would NOT compensate him for having gardeners come around to tend his garden - even if food can be considered necessary. We will compensate for the cost of having groceries delivered.