Member Numbers - Page 2

Black Knight · 05-17-2002, 07:17 AM

I think if you're in the first couple hundred, then we all went to the "new" forum at about the same time. I think I'm about 100 or so, but I was on the first day...oh those reckless hours of trying to keep up with the eight robot posters that we call Cloudbringer... [img]smile.gif[/img]

BK

J'aran · 05-17-2002, 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SomeGuy:
Z created the site...then who could have registered before him? [img]graemlins/saywhat.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/1ponder.gif[/img]

No one. I believe this came up a few months or so ago, and if I remember correctly, there is no member #1. Something to do with the software used for these forums I guess.

Grojlach · 05-17-2002, 07:41 AM

Yorick was #7 IIRC...

/)eathKiller · 05-17-2002, 07:50 AM

i think that [img]graemlins/choc.gif[/img] is number 1 actually [img]tongue.gif[/img]

caleb · 05-17-2002, 07:56 AM

The topic came up yesterday actually

http://www.ironworksforum.com/ubb/no...;f=10;t=008329

Sir Exxon · 05-17-2002, 08:21 AM

We should get the 'Member Search'-option back. Then we could all find out who are the earliest members, if that is so important to someone. [img]smile.gif[/img]

Lavindathar · 05-17-2002, 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sir Exxon:
We should get the 'Member Search'-option back. Then we could all find out who are the earliest members, if that is so important to someone. [img]smile.gif[/img]

Was that sarcasm??

Hope not. No, I was just wonderin, cos I saw Alicats number and thought: Gee, thats low!

Sazerac · 05-17-2002, 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lavindathar:
Was that sarcasm??

Hope not. No, I was just wonderin, cos I saw Alicats number and thought: Gee, thats low!

Hmmmm...it's a possibility!

Well, the lowest numbers are the "blueboarders" since we're the first ones to convert to the new board, but the order really doesn't matter for the reasons stated above. I guess the first 500 numbers are pretty much the "blueboarders", then after that, will be the ones who joined in after March 2001.

-Sazerac

[ 05-17-2002, 01:47 PM: Message edited by: Sazerac ]

Sazerac · 05-17-2002, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by J'aran:
No one. I believe this came up a few months or so ago, and if I remember correctly, there is no member #1. Something to do with the software used for these forums I guess.

I STILL say it's [img]graemlins/choc.gif[/img] . That's my story, and I'm stickin' to it! [img]graemlins/laugh2.gif[/img]

-Saz

05-17-2002, 02:16 PM

Hmmm Seems to me, that low member numbers is a form of class system, I thought we didn't want any differentiation between the users? If personalized or special Avatars are verboten then why are User numbers permitted to be used to make us higher number people feel less worthy?

Ok this isn't how I feel about the issue...I really don't care ...just thought Id ask the question since I am curious about the thoughts of those who were most opposed to the idea of special memberships.

05-17-2002, 07:17 AM	#11
Black Knight Ma'at - Goddess of Truth & Justice Join Date: March 1, 2001 Location: Delaware OH USA Age: 47 Posts: 3,168	I think if you're in the first couple hundred, then we all went to the "new" forum at about the same time. I think I'm about 100 or so, but I was on the first day...oh those reckless hours of trying to keep up with the eight robot posters that we call Cloudbringer... [img]smile.gif[/img] BK __________________ The Black Storm Cloud of the Night - Consort to a Queen- Champion of Truth, Justice and Cloudy's Way - Captain of the Knights of the Golden Dragons - Heart, Mind, and Soul- Newbie at Heart - ()xxxxxxxxxxxxx{}:::::::::::::::::::::>

05-17-2002, 07:41 AM	#13
Grojlach Zartan Join Date: May 2, 2001 Location: Ulpia Noviomagus Batavorum Age: 43 Posts: 5,281	Yorick was #7 IIRC... __________________ [url]\"http://www.audioscrobbler.com/user/Grobbel/\" target=\"_blank\"> [img]\"http://www.denness.net/rpi/username/Grobbel\" alt=\" - \" /></a>

05-17-2002, 07:50 AM	#14
/)eathKiller Dracolisk Join Date: January 5, 2002 Location: Guantanamo Bay, Cuba Age: 38 Posts: 6,043	i think that [img]graemlins/choc.gif[/img] is number 1 actually [img]tongue.gif[/img] __________________ [img]\"http://membres.lycos.fr/th8or/ZeroSigForIronworks.gif\" alt=\" - \" /> o.o;

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Member numbers	Hivetyrant	General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005)	50	10-07-2004 05:41 AM
member numbers	dplax	General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005)	16	10-10-2003 08:42 AM
Youngest IW Member/Oldest IW Member	Lavindathar	General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005)	79	02-13-2002 12:05 PM
# Member numbers #	Yorick	General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005)	57	11-05-2001 06:43 AM
Member Numbers..	Lifetime	General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005)	23	11-03-2001 11:15 AM

05-17-2002, 07:56 AM	#15
caleb Horus - Egyptian Sky God Join Date: April 10, 2001 Location: Tacoma, WA, U.S.A. Age: 39 Posts: 2,615	The topic came up yesterday actually http://www.ironworksforum.com/ubb/no...;f=10;t=008329

05-17-2002, 08:21 AM	#16
Sir Exxon Zartan Join Date: October 15, 2001 Location: Oslo, Norway Age: 35 Posts: 5,367	We should get the 'Member Search'-option back. Then we could all find out who are the earliest members, if that is so important to someone. [img]smile.gif[/img]

05-17-2002, 02:16 PM	#20
MagiK Guest Posts: n/a	Hmmm Seems to me, that low member numbers is a form of class system, I thought we didn't want any differentiation between the users? If personalized or special Avatars are verboten then why are User numbers permitted to be used to make us higher number people feel less worthy? Ok this isn't how I feel about the issue...I really don't care ...just thought Id ask the question since I am curious about the thoughts of those who were most opposed to the idea of special memberships.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)