Visit the Ironworks Gaming Website Email the Webmaster Graphics Library Rules and Regulations Help Support Ironworks Forum with a Donation to Keep us Online - We rely totally on Donations from members Donation goal Meter

Ironworks Gaming Radio

Ironworks Gaming Forum

Go Back   Ironworks Gaming Forum > Ironworks Gaming Classics > Wizards & Warriors Forum
FAQ Calendar Arcade Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-03-2001, 12:04 AM   #1
Cygoth
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

It strikes me as rather odd that a number of W&W reviews that I've come across are rather negative, and few rate the game highly. Despite a multitude of minor annoyances in the game, it's still the best and most immersive crpg I've ever played - but I seem to be in a minority. Most reviewers wax lyrical over the supposedly etherial beauty of BG2 and Torment, and claim that they have 'set new standards for the genre'. I beg to differ. I *loved* the original BG, and played it to death - but Bioware should have let the Stupidity Engine die. Instead they just keep pumping out more of the same with a few bells and whistles - *yawn*. BG was more of a fantasy tactical combat game than a rpg, and the sequels just delivered more of the same, with new annoyances to add to the old ones. No D&D game should ever allow characters to rise above level ten, where the whole game system just collapses in a horrifically unbalanced heap.
But that seems to be what the public wants - Diablo 2, BG2 etc. So what's the future of the immersive single -player, first-person crpg? Is it going to become a small niche market dominated by primative shareware products, while the mass market laps up the latest over-hyped D&D puke? The M&M and Wizardry series' seem to be in limbo, and their developers are having serious problems. I doubt that HP have even come close to covering the development costs for W&W, and the community is tiny. About the only 'real' crpg on the horizon is Morrowind, and it remains to be seen if it will sell well enough to cover costs, let alone make publishers rich. Has there been a quality first person crpg in recent years that was financially successful?
I'm concerned about the hijacking of the genre and it's devolution into mass-market, consolish mediocrity, and even moreso at the collective attitude of the press. Can you imagine if food critics applauded how McCrapburgers had redefined the restaurant industry, and that 'real' restaurants were just lame throwbacks that should get with the program? That's how I feel about the gaming press response to BG2/D2 vs. W&W.
*sigh*
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2001, 12:18 AM   #2
Wyvern
Ironworks Moderator
 

Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Rural Paradise, MI
Posts: 5,701
Default

Nicely said, Cygoth!

I have long had issues with the professional game reviewers. Of course as with any reviewer you have to have some understanding of "where they are coming from " to put any perspective on their reviews. Even so, too many of them seem to be more inclined to show off how refined/elitest they are and rarely do their likes and dislikes match my own. The media in general is often like this. A few people are in a position to make critiques which affect markets and the actual people who make up the market don't have a fair opportunity to voice their opinions or counter act the damage done by the reviewers. The other unfair aspect is that reviews are written with a deadline - wanting to appear when the game goes on the market or even before which does not give the reviewer any time to really play the game longer, reconsider their critique or take a look at what the real public reaction to the game is. A reviewer who had to read this board and THEN write a review of W&W would have written a much different review.

Wyv
Wyvern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2001, 01:05 PM   #3
Gefallen
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Most fun I have had since Crusaders of the Dark Savant

Anyone know any recommended games like this or Crusaders?

Thanks!
Gef

taking a bit of time away from EQ
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2001, 02:19 PM   #4
Elowin
Welcomed New User
 

Join Date: January 3, 2002
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 2
Default

I think you said it all and know the answer. W&W has a multitude of annoyances compared to Bioware's Infinity Engine. The Infinity Engine also has a nicer more intuitive interface that keeps you out of the manual rather then in it as far as how things function. This is a case of as immersive as W&W is it still is a more painful overall experience then Baulder's Gate, Tales of the Sword Coast, BG2, Plainscape: Torment, or Icewind Dale. Very early on I made a "feels-like" comparison to Guardians of Destiny. W&W remains very similar to it. A great adventure story plot and very immersive but painful in other respects. Just keep trying--don't give up. But I'll tell you a worse problem now for me... These CRPG's are to large. I play them forever it seems and cannot manage breaks very well in between to do other essential tasks, i.e., Christmas cards are still sitting here waiting to be done. It is all too addictive for me I am afraid. I can't stop!
Elowin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2001, 04:44 PM   #5
Dwarf
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Allow me to express my totally unbiassed (LOL) opinion.Role Players and computers don't mix.Basically a computer can't make up a rule on the spot to cover unforseen circumstances (merely refusing to let you try anything adventurous),it has no personality(forcing dialogue to become a tactical navigation through preset phrases and stale unspontaneous speaches).In honest truth most role players are happily chanting "Hello my friend,shtay a while and listen" whilst rolling dice around a table with their mates, and only turn the computers on if there's noone to play with.That is why I beieve that there is virtually no such thing as a CRPG because computers basically seem to work in a narrow minded,mathematically preset, way without personal choice.What most CRPG's actually seem to be is highly sophistcated Tactical games with a fantasy or sci fi setting.As a pint of interest most of my friends still remember the phrase "You haven't role played until the GM's had an NPC use a grappling hook as a weapon.".
Now, turning to W&W.It looked very like the notorious Might and Magic things but without so much dull button and lift hunting and with more of a classic storyline.Also it didn't have some atrocious sci fi pun in it (when I want to walk around with blasters and laser guns I play UFO: Enemy Unknown or Unreal or something like that).Please bear in mind that M&M8 seemed a little rushed (the characters don't speak most of the time,they don't speak when entering areas,the maps are tiny compared to MM6 and the storyline is rubbish compared to MM7).I just hope that this doesn't turn out like Revenant did (unsupported by the producers, the makers made two or three patches then left it alone for legal reasons(Eidos held the copywrite for four years and threatened them with legal action)).If you made a full installation you might have noticed that among the various pictures (the character sheets etc seem to be made up of pictures) there is a Multi Player Game Joining Screen.What happened to this? Did the game get rushed by the producers who wanted to make a quick proffit?Was it decided too tricky to implement? If so then why was this screen on the installation disks?Was it because they hadn't bothered taking it out or was it so that they could make a multi player patch?Maybe they realised that without random maps Multi Player would be pretty pointless.Anyway,enough questions.It would be nice if Mr D.W.Bradley would read this (as he aapparently reads this forum, and why not? Custuomer feedback would be extremely handy for his next product).
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2001, 05:08 PM   #6
Erad
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

I gotta agree with Dwarf.There is no such thing as RPG on computer, just a ...shadow of it.I played a few times rpg with my friends, and comparing to that, crpgs are..closed-in, if i might say that(imagine---you are sitting with friends and you have just finished quest of killing Cet.Now what, one asks:What are we going to do now?;Then the other:Lets sail endless sea/climb great serran mountains/something like that), or--In tavern--, a bar fight.There are endless plots to consider while playing in paper rpgs, when in crpgs, putting ,for an instance, sailing endless sea would mean too much work.Look at BG, there are closed-in sections, there is no adventuring!W&W is better in that aspect here, You can actually FEEL the world as you march through, while in BG---lets go to square on the left, lets go to trademeet(where is it?that big icon in the middle of the map).

You ppl propablly know it all, but I just wanted to say something on that case

PS.Sorry for my spelling,Im still learning.

Erad
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2001, 06:54 PM   #7
Erad
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

In addiotion to my post------Lost Sea is no longer uncharted, now where can I sell my map, hmm
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2001, 09:31 PM   #8
Wyvern
Ironworks Moderator
 

Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Rural Paradise, MI
Posts: 5,701
Default

For better than 15 years I played RPGs online in chat rooms. Face to face rpgers probably wouldn't think it was the best way to go, but I found it to be great fun. Made some really excellent friends playing rpg online! So while CRPGs will never quite hit the mark, online "live" games come close! (just no graphics! rather like back to Infocom days!)

Wyv
Wyvern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2001, 10:10 PM   #9
tritone
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Long live WW! It is also to me the best and only true RPG I've played since Wiz7. In fact, after a few weeks of playing WW, I actually realised with horror that prior to playing it, I've actually forgotten what it's like to play a true-blue RPG. I realised that I had almost come to believe unconsciously that "RPG" meant BG and D2, rather than something like the Wizardry series. The horror, the horror.

I suspect one problem with reviewers is that they simply do not immerse themselves in the game - I mean, for an RPG as deep as WW, how can anyone possibly be fit to review it without playing at least a few months' worth??? Reviewers often write a review as soon as they're ready to move on... or rather, when the deadline approaches. I bring up the case of the review in PC Gamer - much to my pleasant surprise, the reviewer actually gave it a good review, rated about 70+%. But though I am grateful for that, upon the reading the review, I get the feeling that the reviewer didn't play very far at all into the game.

Right now, I'm just hoping it's all a phase, as it's been.. I mean, there were times when gamers declared that RPGs were dead... no they weren't, they were just evolving... now they say adventures are dead, but I'm not sure. Hopefully when software development is more advanced and efficient, more bug-free WW-type games can be produced...

BTW, I hate the Bioware Infinity engine too.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2001, 11:13 PM   #10
Sazerac
Ironworks Moderator
 

Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Monroe, LA
Age: 60
Posts: 7,387
Default

Actually, most of the reviews I read were fairly upbeat and positive. However, having visited the USENET forums, it's been pretty dismal in there, especially in the "big" one:
ews:comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg They've been pretty gawdawful about it in there; however, I find rarely that what they like is what I like. That's why I try to find the online "web" forums more. I think the USENET forums tend to be a lot more "techie" and less end-user.

For those of you wanting to find copies of the Wizardry games, your best bet is the Interplay web site, which I've mentioned before. They're the ones that took over the republishing of the Wizardry games since Sir-Tech bought a farm in '98. You can purchase them online there, or write to them or call them. I know there was some trepidation about purchasing things online. Fact of the matter is, most online vendors are more than willing to work with "alternative arrangements". Not everyone has credit cards, or credit for that matter.

Cheers,
Sazerac
Sazerac is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Our Future? Arvon General Discussion 7 04-20-2005 06:04 PM
The Future of P2P LennonCook General Discussion 8 04-03-2005 08:50 PM
Your Future? Arvon General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) 3 12-19-2003 12:05 PM
Is there a future for W&W??? Featherstone Wizards & Warriors Forum 5 12-05-2002 08:42 AM
What do you think about the future? SomeGuy General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) 7 04-25-2002 04:22 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2024 Ironworks Gaming & ©2024 The Great Escape Studios TM - All Rights Reserved