What punishment should she get?

[LordKathen]

Originally posted by Yorick: Pardon me for intruding on a wonderful argument, but did anyone notice that Donut stated the woman was innocent? Found innocent? The point is now moot. Those who suggested she should be killed should be ashamed. You'd have killed an innocent woman who lost her two children. What a terrible tragedy that she even lost 3 years of her life. Three years is a lot of time.

I was wondering the same thing. This goes to show, that you should read all the posts before replying to a topic. I realise there was a debate starting, but It seemed a little ironic that the pro-death replies were still coming after she was posted cleared.

[Rokenn]

Originally posted by LordKathen: quote: Originally posted by Yorick: Pardon me for intruding on a wonderful argument, but did anyone notice that Donut stated the woman was innocent? Found innocent? The point is now moot. Those who suggested she should be killed should be ashamed. You'd have killed an innocent woman who lost her two children. What a terrible tragedy that she even lost 3 years of her life. Three years is a lot of time.

I was wondering the same thing. This goes to show, that you should read all the posts before replying to a topic. I realise there was a debate starting, but It seemed a little ironic that the pro-death replies were still coming after she was posted cleared.[/QUOTE]well when sharks smell blood it's hard to get em to stop [img]tongue.gif[/img]

[Timber Loftis]

Originally posted by Rokenn: quote: Originally posted by LordKathen: quote: Originally posted by Yorick: Pardon me for intruding on a wonderful argument, but did anyone notice that Donut stated the woman was innocent? Found innocent? The point is now moot. Those who suggested she should be killed should be ashamed. You'd have killed an innocent woman who lost her two children. What a terrible tragedy that she even lost 3 years of her life. Three years is a lot of time.

I was wondering the same thing. This goes to show, that you should read all the posts before replying to a topic. I realise there was a debate starting, but It seemed a little ironic that the pro-death replies were still coming after she was posted cleared.[/QUOTE]well when sharks smell blood it's hard to get em to stop [img]tongue.gif[/img] [/QUOTE]On the same note, had YOU GUYS kept reading, you have noted that:
1. I mentioned there was a theoretical point to the debate to be addressed irregardless of her innocence;
2. I asked folks to assume a 100% fool-proof guilt situation and then address the topic.

Sheesh

[LordKathen]

I did read on, and was just saying that it seemed irrelevent once she was innocent. I was not trying to insult you or your debate. [img]smile.gif[/img]

It seems to me, that any topic posted that has any questionable subject, usually rapidly turns into a debate. I suppose im guilty of this to. Just an observation man.

sheesh

[ 01-31-2003, 11:44 AM: Message edited by: LordKathen ]

[LordKathen]

Im an avatar now!!!

[Timber Loftis]

Yeah, well I apoligize Lord K -
especially for using irregardless, which isn't a real word.

[Barry the Sprout]

Originally posted by Timber Loftis: Yeah, well I apoligize Lord K - especially for using irregardless, which isn't a real word.

Don't mention the war! I mentioned it once, but I think we got away with it!

[LordKathen]

All is vonderfull TL.

[norompanlasolas]

Originally posted by Yorick: Pardon me for intruding on a wonderful argument, but did anyone notice that Donut stated the woman was innocent? Found innocent? The point is now moot. Those who suggested she should be killed should be ashamed. You'd have killed an innocent woman who lost her two children. What a terrible tragedy that she even lost 3 years of her life. Three years is a lot of time.

yep, i saw it also... maybe he should write in CAPS.

[gaunty]

well you could send her to IRAN or IRAQ to live a perfect caoticly muslum life.
I say put her on a hot seat and fry her hide off.