Another Crook Admits, steps aside

[Felix The Assassin]

Wow! This is what, number 4?

http://www.reuters.com/article/topNe...5125QR20090203

[SpiritWarrior]

Number 2 isn't it? Three if you count Bush who recently stepped aside, but he most certainly takes up 2 spots if not more - not to mention the rest of his rogue admin. My goodness.

[Felix The Assassin]

Originally Posted by SpiritWarrior Number 2 isn't it? Three if you count Bush who recently stepped aside, but he most certainly takes up 2 spots if not more - not to mention the rest of his rogue admin. My goodness.

Really? And what charges have been brought?

I guess you were too scared to read the article, because the real number is greater than two. It's a shame really, all these (D) law makers are the one's breaking the law!

[SpiritWarrior]

Only the blood of innocent people. If all these D's are breaking the law they learned from the best.

Yes, I am a cowering ball of fear as far as it relates to a link you posted.(?)

But seriously, I quit reading any link citations in your posts because I found them to have the same blatant spin every time. Even that whitehouse.gov article I recall expecting to find some raw data, until I discovered it was the Republican Party section of the site and was written by some dude who wanted to run away with Bush and despised Clinton (same old tune). Why are you even presenting these links here? If that's the case there's thousands of sites that say the opposite of what you say, and there's alot more of them. I can just post them all day.

[Felix The Assassin]

Originally Posted by SpiritWarrior Only the blood of innocent people. If all these D's are breaking the law they learned from the best. Yes, I am a cowering ball of fear as far as it relates to a link you posted.(?) But seriously, I quit reading any link citations in your posts because I found them to have the same blatant spin every time. Even that whitehouse.gov article I recall expecting to find some raw data, until I discovered it was the Republican Party section of the site and was written by some dude who wanted to run away with Bush and despised Clinton (same old tune). Why are you even presenting these links here? If that's the case there's thousands of sites that say the opposite of what you say, and there's alot more of them. I can just post them all day.

There is always two sides to a story, ABC, CBS, CNN spin left, Fox spins right, Reuters lays it out, that is why I use Reuters!

Problem is, there has yet to be a politician worth their salt as a politician!

As the tale goes, silence is acceptance, therefore, I'm using my rights, while I still have them!