04-17-2004, 09:57 AM | #1 |
Baaz Draconian
Join Date: June 17, 2002
Location: NY
Age: 37
Posts: 723
|
Now, I'm more than a little curious, how long has the institution been subverted?
We have solid proof of active subversion as early as 1970, with Nixon's white house actively gathering intelligence and laying down plans (and executing those plans) for sabatoge, espionage and the overall CIA-type Black Operations, known more commonly by the colloquialisms of 'mindfuck' and 'ratfucking.' Including all the things Kennedy did to Nixon to beat him in 1960, stuffing ballot boxes, propaganda, unfavorable press (the Canuck Letter, which ruined Muskie, written by Clawson) and other dirty little tricks. I wonder, if Lepke had come forward with the proof he had about Franklin Roosevelt, would FDR have lost the election? Most certainly. Before he became president of the US, FDR was governer of NY, and his family and his friends were together part of one of the biggest corruption and racketeering rings in NY history. He was Boss Tweed with a legit job. Lepke had solid proof of his racketeering connections, and the kickbacks he took to keep his mouth shut and to make sure certain individuals (Lepke himself, for example) didn't get any trouble as they did their dastardly deeds. It could have sent FDR to Sing-Sing... In short, the process was always dirty, but deliberately subverted by those in power? That's a fairly new phenomena, and ever since FDR got elected, its authenticity and viability among political hucksters was solidified... The trick of course, was getting certain individuals in the right place, at the right time, and Nixon's CRP machine was masterful at it. They ran it like a CIA intelligence operation, muscled up with a psy-war. It was wartime intelligence tactics against a legitimate, legal process, against the workings of our nation. The action is incredible, unbelievable, but it's happened. Is it still happening? Of course it is, to politicians, getting elected is all that matters. Why ignore a powerful weapon on hand to get elected, illegal and unethical, or not? Your enemy is already doing it to you, so there's no defensible reason their minds, after all, you're merely 'balancing the playing field.' It's a shocking thing to consider, striking in what it could and does mean, but it must be argued, and here, we can discuss it with civility and hammer out the basic points, what to do, where to do it, and when. EDIT: Wasn't sure on Muskie's first name, so removed it... [ 04-20-2004, 04:54 PM: Message edited by: Oblivion437 ]
__________________
[img]\"http://www.jtdistributing.com/pics/tshirts/experts%20copy.jpg\" alt=\" - \" /> |
04-17-2004, 09:32 PM | #2 |
Drow Warrior
Join Date: April 1, 2004
Location: trapped inside this octavarium
Age: 57
Posts: 251
|
Dude, read up on the 1876 election. (Hayes-Tilden) There's been dirty tricks as long as there have been elections.
__________________
<i>\"You have been sat here far too long for the good that you are doing. Depart, I say, and let us be done with you. In the name of God, go!\"</i>\"--Oliver Cromwell |
04-18-2004, 07:51 AM | #3 |
Vampire
Join Date: January 29, 2003
Location: Sweden
Age: 43
Posts: 3,888
|
The only recommendation I can give is for average citizens to try to get involved into the political and democratic processes and get an insight on how they work. Abuse of power always happens sooner or later, and will continue to flourish as long as most of us remain clueless about what our politicians do.
[ 04-18-2004, 08:00 AM: Message edited by: Stratos ]
__________________
Nothing is impossible, it's just a matter of probability. |
04-18-2004, 06:19 PM | #4 |
Baaz Draconian
Join Date: June 17, 2002
Location: NY
Age: 37
Posts: 723
|
I know about the dirty tricks (they go back further than the days of Tammany Hall) and all that. But an active campaign to completely destroy a group insurging power against the established party? That's fairly new.
If more than 50% of the population voted, things would be much better. It would certainly have fat-cats shitting their pants.
__________________
[img]\"http://www.jtdistributing.com/pics/tshirts/experts%20copy.jpg\" alt=\" - \" /> |
04-18-2004, 11:51 PM | #5 | |
Ninja Storm Shadow
Join Date: March 27, 2001
Location: Northport,Alabama, USA
Age: 62
Posts: 3,577
|
Quote:
__________________
Crustiest of the OLD COOTS "Donating mirrors for years to help the Liberal/Socialist find their collective rear-ends, because both hands doesn't seem to be working. Veitnam 61-65:KIA 1864 66:KIA 5008 67:KIA 9378 68:KIA 14594 69:KIA 9414 70:KIA 4221 71:KIA 1380 72:KIA 300 Afghanistan2001-2008 KIA 585 2009-2012 KIA 1465 and counting Davros 1 Much abliged Massachusetts |
|
04-19-2004, 01:53 AM | #6 | |
40th Level Warrior
Join Date: July 11, 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 11,916
|
Quote:
|
|
04-20-2004, 04:52 PM | #7 |
Baaz Draconian
Join Date: June 17, 2002
Location: NY
Age: 37
Posts: 723
|
Well imagine it John, while Americans, like all groups of people, aren't too bright on average, only 18 million or so voted in the last election, if over 100 million voted, that would be something. You can fool 1 idiot. You can fool 100. You can even fool 18 million? But can you fool 100 million? The social neurons will connect at some point.
__________________
[img]\"http://www.jtdistributing.com/pics/tshirts/experts%20copy.jpg\" alt=\" - \" /> |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Democracy and the U.S. Story | Timber Loftis | General Discussion | 8 | 04-02-2004 01:23 PM |
Veto in democracy? | WillowIX | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 28 | 07-01-2003 03:41 PM |
Iraqi democracy | Donut | General Discussion | 9 | 04-22-2003 11:15 AM |
Sad Day For Democracy | Felix The Assassin | General Discussion | 1 | 03-12-2003 01:55 PM |
Practicing with T'Rang Youngers | jsteng | Miscellaneous Games (RPG or not) | 4 | 02-08-2002 09:14 AM |