07-24-2002, 09:56 PM | #51 | |
Apophis
Join Date: October 19, 2001
Location: New York
Age: 37
Posts: 4,666
|
Quote:
|
|
07-24-2002, 11:08 PM | #52 |
Symbol of Cyric
Join Date: January 27, 2002
Location: Plateau of Singapore
Age: 60
Posts: 1,230
|
I'm migrating to Mars!
__________________
<br />Look! Everyone\'s admiring me! <img border=\"0\" title=\"\" alt=\"[Big Grin]\" src=\"biggrin.gif\" /> |
07-24-2002, 11:13 PM | #53 | |
John Locke
Join Date: February 7, 2002
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Age: 35
Posts: 8,985
|
Quote:
|
|
07-24-2002, 11:17 PM | #54 | |
Symbol of Cyric
Join Date: January 27, 2002
Location: Plateau of Singapore
Age: 60
Posts: 1,230
|
Quote:
__________________
<br />Look! Everyone\'s admiring me! <img border=\"0\" title=\"\" alt=\"[Big Grin]\" src=\"biggrin.gif\" /> |
|
07-24-2002, 11:19 PM | #55 | |
John Locke
Join Date: February 7, 2002
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Age: 35
Posts: 8,985
|
Quote:
|
|
07-24-2002, 11:22 PM | #56 | |
Emerald Dragon
Join Date: September 25, 2001
Location: NY , NY
Age: 63
Posts: 960
|
Quote:
But seriously,to hell with the space station!! I am going to stock up on amunition , heavy weapons and canned food. Then I will go out to the caves in Yellow Stone and pick one to turn into my secret command center. After the asteroid hits it will be just me and the roaches!!! [ 07-24-2002, 11:25 PM: Message edited by: The Hunter of Jahanna ]
__________________
\"How much do I love you?? I\'ll tell you one thing, it\'d be a whole hell of a lot more if you stopped nagging me and made me a friggin sandwich.\" |
|
07-24-2002, 11:22 PM | #57 | |
John Locke
Join Date: February 7, 2002
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Age: 35
Posts: 8,985
|
Quote:
|
|
07-24-2002, 11:26 PM | #58 |
Elminster
Join Date: July 17, 2002
Location: Aberdeenshire, Scotland, UK
Age: 37
Posts: 451
|
More to the point...*who* will choose? Who has that right?
__________________
Say No to Cosmetics Control! And the Trouser Tyranny!<br /><br />Like Final Fantasy? -[url]\"http://forums.ragnarokextreme.net\" target=\"_blank\">Ragnarok Extreme Forums</a>!! |
07-25-2002, 12:03 AM | #59 |
Silver Dragon
Join Date: March 25, 2001
Location: The Lion City
Age: 62
Posts: 1,699
|
For another perspective on the matter, look here.
Here are my thoughts: First of all, not enough data has been collected to accurately predict the asteroid's trajectory. As more data is collected over the next few weeks, astronomers will be able to refine their calculations of its trajectory. Secondly, assuming that it is indeed on a collision course, well, we have 17 years to do something about it. Thirdly, the object is too small to cause the extinction of the human race, although the consequences of an impact would still be catastrophic. Given that 70% of the Earth's suface is water, odds are that the object will plunge into an ocean somewhere -- what a tidal wave it would make!! Fourthly, given the fact that all of humanity faces such a dire threat, I still have faith that this would galvanise all people & unite the world to attempt to find a way to avert this disaster. Of course, if the object *does* impact the Earth, wherever that may happen, I guess the amount of dust thrown up would probably give rise to a "nuclear winter" scenario... Lastly, the consequences of theimpact depend very much on the make up of the asteroid. If it is rock/metal, we're in for troble. If it is a looser conglomeration of debris, then things may not be so bad.
__________________
I visit IW occasionally... |
07-25-2002, 03:14 AM | #60 | |
Takhisis Follower
Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Mandurah, West Australia
Age: 60
Posts: 5,073
|
Quote:
A swarm of ten thousand smaller rocks could potentialy wipe out a much greater proportion of life, since instead of one huge blast and a massive shock waves, you have thousands of blasts and thousands of shocks. You cant nuke it unless its still a fair distance away, and even then its risky. What you could do is use a barrage of nukes detonating 100 Ks out to nudge it off course. If you do it early enough you dont need to give it that much total energy, and if your smart (read: have a big computer) it woudnt be to hard to put it onto a earth/moon gravity sling into the sun. It would probably require Earths total stock of nuclear and thermonuclear wepaonry, at least.[/QB][/QUOTE]Don't know that this argument sounds all that credible to me. Burn up rate in the atmosphere will be proportional to exposed surface area, so you are going to get a better overall destruction of mass in the atmosphere through prior fragmentation. If the overall mass is big enough to cause an exinction event at impact then fragmentation would be preffered.
__________________
Davros was right - just ask JD |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|