07-21-2005, 07:03 AM | #41 |
Fzoul Chembryl
Join Date: July 13, 2004
Location: Finland
Age: 35
Posts: 1,701
|
Back to westerns swords vs. katana, eh? If you want sharp, take Death's scythe from Discworld.
__________________
|
07-21-2005, 09:39 AM | #42 |
Manshoon
Join Date: November 3, 2004
Location: FlagStaff Hill S.A. Australia
Age: 43
Posts: 171
|
Long sword or scim..... hmmmmmm RUN AWAY!
I dont exactly like pointy objects near my face so i'd probably want a flail with a really long chain. Or maybe even a sield with a large blade at the bottom so i can protect and stab [img]tongue.gif[/img] pity they werent invented though. I'd go for the long sword just for the extra distance. But i'd much rather be using a BOOMSTICK! [ 07-21-2005, 09:40 AM: Message edited by: Pop 'n Fresh ]
__________________
[img]\"http://img79.imageshack.us/img79/5936/sbadfurday00037fg.png\" alt=\" - \" /><br />BRING ME SOME SWEETCORN!<br /><br />What do the Enterprise and toilet paper have in common? They both circle Uranus in search of klingons |
07-21-2005, 01:34 PM | #43 | |
Galvatron
Join Date: January 10, 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 56
Posts: 2,109
|
Quote:
Marty 4, I've seen great swords, up close and personal, held one in both my hands, and while it is heavy, it's not one hundred pounds. I do, however, agree that longswords are not all that heavy. Fuctional ones weigh a bit more than two pounds, but they aren't all that heavy, maybe eight to ten pounds all told. [/QUOTE]Weight of a longsword depends a lot on the design. Blades typically considered 'longswords' (by people today) are single handed weapons with a distally tapered blade. Classical blades typically weigh 2-3 lbs and are well balanced with a COG an inch or two forward of the tang. There were periods of time when bashing was the most effective way to defeat an armored opponent, and at those times the blades tended to get heavier (to break an arm through armor), but often these blades were used point first (stick the pointy end into the bad guy) so were light and fast. Scimitars or slashing blades in contrast tend to have COG's farther forward on the blade, the also tend to weigh MORE than the typical longsword (think about it... you want the inertia of your oblique stroke to have enough energy to cut through thick leather and wood armor)... and were primarily used for cutting through cloth or light armor with a long drawing cut (acting a lot like a saw blade). Here's a good article about straight vs. curved weapons by a brilliant gentleman who knew a bit about war... http://www.pattonhq.com/textfiles/saber.html [ 07-21-2005, 01:53 PM: Message edited by: Thoran ] |
|
07-21-2005, 01:50 PM | #44 | |
Galvatron
Join Date: January 10, 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 56
Posts: 2,109
|
Quote:
|
|
07-23-2005, 02:13 AM | #45 |
Manshoon
Join Date: November 3, 2004
Location: FlagStaff Hill S.A. Australia
Age: 43
Posts: 171
|
I changed my mind.
I'd want a pike so i could smash his/her head with the side of the pike thus stunning him whilst i could do the pokey pokey in his face. Long Sword still beats Scimitar.
__________________
[img]\"http://img79.imageshack.us/img79/5936/sbadfurday00037fg.png\" alt=\" - \" /><br />BRING ME SOME SWEETCORN!<br /><br />What do the Enterprise and toilet paper have in common? They both circle Uranus in search of klingons |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|