Should we go to war against Iraq?

[slicer15]

Originally posted by Dragonshadow: Why do we need wars anyway? And I didn't know there is a war forum... only been here for a few mounths or somming...

Yeah, you have to click on "Ironworks Gaming" on the left of "Ironworks Gaming Forums" next to where it displays whether you are logged in or not. The war forum is at the bottom titled "America at war". You probably didn't find it as it isn't a gaming forum.

Here is a link to "Ironworks Gaming if you're lazy.
It's right at the bottom.

[Kaltia]

Hmm, the French view seems as popular as going without UN approval.
Good poll!

[Timber Loftis]

Viewing the results, I am *amazed* [img]graemlins/wow.gif[/img] at how evenly divided we are.

[Rikard_OHF]

Originally posted by MagiK: Your poll is flawed, it is a matter of public and historical record, and undisputed by the UN that Iraq has in fact had and has not accounted for many WomD.

Magik regardless of what Powell said, there's been no Hard proof, no foto's of weapons depots, that Iraq has those wapons
as such it's possible to find it unproven that Iraq has those weapons
and as such it's a plausible option imho

Edit
to make things clearer
It's what some people think
It's not what I think right
I'm just explaining in here why that option excists
I'm not defending that option

[ 03-13-2003, 03:37 PM: Message edited by: Rikard_OHF ]

The evenly spread results are kind of interesting.

[Rikard_OHF]

Originally posted by MagiK: The evenly spread results are kind of interesting.

I must say i didnt expect it to be evenly spread
I thought - I hoped that the 2nd and 4th option would get the most votes
nice to see people at least have opinions [img]tongue.gif[/img]

You got a PM Rickard [img]smile.gif[/img] And yeah I agree with you, I pretty much actually expected the same thing you did. I am also glad that you made this Poll, I really had wanted to open something similar in the War forum...but..as you said..No Polls there.

[Timber Loftis]

Originally posted by Rikard_OHF: Quote: Originally posted by MagiK: Your poll is flawed, it is a matter of public and historical record, and undisputed by the UN that Iraq has in fact had and has not accounted for many WomD.

Magik regardless of what Powell said, there's been no Hard proof, no foto's of weapons depots, that Iraq has those wapons
as such it's possible to find it unproven that Iraq has those weapons
and as such it's a plausible option imho[/QUOTE]Rikard, you asked us not to do this and Memsie-poo asked as well. Please guys - just don't.

[johnny]

Originally posted by Rikard_OHF: Quote: Originally posted by MagiK: Your poll is flawed, it is a matter of public and historical record, and undisputed by the UN that Iraq has in fact had and has not accounted for many WomD.

Magik regardless of what Powell said, there's been no Hard proof, no foto's of weapons depots, that Iraq has those wapons
as such it's possible to find it unproven that Iraq has those weapons
and as such it's a plausible option imho[/QUOTE]http://projects.sipri.se/cbw/researc...heet-1984.html

It's too bad this site doesn't show pics of what the effects of the gasattacks were. I've seen em, in a book about the Iran/Iraq war.
Exactly how much evidence do you need ?

[WillowIX]

John-bon sweety. [img]smile.gif[/img] We were asked not to debate this topic in here.

Here´s an idea for all of you. Start a thread in the war forum and put a link to the debate in this thread. It would be easy to debate the topic then for all who wants to, wouldn´t it? [img]smile.gif[/img]