09-25-2001, 03:39 PM | #31 |
Elminster
Join Date: September 23, 2001
Location: Istanbul (not Constantinople)
Age: 45
Posts: 486
|
I don't do fighters, clerics, or thiefs, and most specialist mages.
Seriously though, everytime I've played I've always been some sort of spellcaster. Cleric/Mage, Mage, Sorceror and Wild Mage (I'll be doing those next), occasional Bard, and that's pretty much it. If I had to pick one that I absolutely would never play, it would probably be a Wizard Slayer. Quel Suprise... |
09-25-2001, 09:56 PM | #32 |
Dracolisk
Join Date: September 16, 2001
Location: Bellingham, WA, USA
Age: 46
Posts: 6,901
|
Single-class Mage Vs. Thief/Mage or Thief->Mage:
SINGLE- Sees Multi, casts Invisibility or Improved Invisibility MULTI- Sees Single starting to cast something, backs out of his sight range, goes to Stealth, and comes back before the spell finishes SINGLE- "Ahhh, he just ran away. Coward. Waste of a memorized spell." MULTI- Casts Dispel Magic from Stealth SINGLE- "How'd he cast Invisibility faster than I did?" SINGLE- Casts Melf's Acid Arrow MULTI- Damage Taken(6) SINGLE- "That should keep him from casting any more spells...." MULTI- Goes to Stealth SINGLE- "Huh?" MULTI- Damage Taken(4) SINGLE- Casts Ghost Armor and Deflect Magic MULTI- Attacks Single MULTI- Critical Hit MULTI- Backstab Quadruple Damage SINGLE- Damage Taken(144) SINGLE- Death |
09-26-2001, 11:16 PM | #33 |
Manshoon
Join Date: July 22, 2001
Location: Brazil
Posts: 153
|
MWAHAHAHAHA!!!!! Well said...
Personally, I prefer dual mage/thief (once having maxed out hide in shadows, find traps and open locks, of course)due to faster level progression and slightly better HP. But either way, they're better than a single mage who can't hold his own in a fight after running out of spells. They can defend themselves from magic but once combat protections are gone, they can't resist a blow from a powerful weapon. Just some hits and he's a dead mage. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|