Weapons of Mass Destruction

[John D Harris]

Attalus,
I'm pretty sure your batch has to go to the "Grassy Knoll" since you're in Texas. Don't forget to wear your aluminum foil hat so the mircowaves beamed from triple secret locals won't confuse you, and you in up taking it to "Area51". You know those aliens don't like to wait for us Terrains.

Hey Attalus what happened to Va Va Vicky? Have you tried the Va Va Vicky flirtpak yet? JC finished it up last week. And she's a hotty

[ 04-07-2003, 10:08 PM: Message edited by: John D Harris ]

[Attalus]

Sorry, John, I haven't heard of that one. Is it a mod?

[Sir Taliesin]

Originally posted by John D Harris: Quote: Originally posted by Skunk: Leastways when we've had enough time to plant some...

Not yet Skunk, I haven't finished brewing my batch up for the evil "Bush regime" and the vast Rightwing Anlgo/American/Big oil/anti-enviromentalist conspiracy. How about you guys Sir T and Mordenheim, have you finished brewing up your batches? Isn't the colection point for our "home brew" the "Grassy Knoll"? Or do we have to take it to Area51 so the aleins can plant it useing their super dupper double secret technolgy?

*Spoiler*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*Illustrating absurdity by absurdity [/QUOTE]Nope not finished mine yet. Any of you guys got any brain of JFK? How bout any ear of Kissinger? Those are both essential ingredents in "Evil Bush Regime Conspiracy".

Skunk, I think you listen to way to much anti-american propaganda.

LOL Go easy guys! There ae plenty of people inside the U.S. who also feel the Bush regime is quite capable of planting evidence against their opposers.

[John D Harris]

Originally posted by Lil Lil: LOL Go easy guys! There ae plenty of people inside the U.S. who also feel the Bush regime is quite capable of planting evidence against their opposers.

I know I'm being BAD very Bad , but in order for a conspiracy of that size to work there would have to be lots of people in on it. That many people couldn't keep their mouths shut, not with the money that could be made on one of the talk shows.

[Skunk]

Skunk, I think you listen to way to much anti-american propaganda.

You mean I read the speeches by Bush and co?

But seriously, there was an awful lot of planted and fabricated evidence to start this war. And when the public saw through that, rhetoric and distorted history was used instead as a justification.

Don't you remember the 'uranium in a shoebox' scam that was ran in Sept2002? It hit every major US news network - but not a single international one. Then some British and Austrialian reporters began to do some investigating over the US scare story and got suspicious when:

[*]the driver of the taxi 'disappeared'[*]the taxi that supposed to have carried them totally destroyed in an 'arson' attack in the
police compound[*]the suspects mysteriously vanished[*]the suspects records (fingerprints and mugshots) were mislaid[*]they couldn't find any journalist who actually saw the nuclear material
that was apparently 'on police public display', nor could anyone identify the
journalist that photographed the containers - and then... [*]the nuclear material mysteriously vanished...[/list]If fake 'evidence' was planted before, why not again?

[ 04-08-2003, 04:20 AM: Message edited by: Skunk ]

[Sir Taliesin]

Originally posted by Skunk: Quote: Skunk, I think you listen to way to much anti-american propaganda.

You mean I read the speeches by Bush and co?

But seriously, there was an awful lot of planted and fabricated evidence to start this war. And when the public saw through that, rhetoric and distorted history was used instead as a justification.

Don't you remember the 'uranium in a shoebox' scam that was ran in Sept2002? It hit every major US news network - but not a single international one. Then some British and Austrialian reporters began to do some investigating over the US scare story and got suspicious when:

[*]the driver of the taxi 'disappeared'
[*]the taxi that supposed to have carried them totally destroyed in an 'arson' attack in the
police compound
[*]the suspects mysteriously vanished
[*]the suspects records (fingerprints and mugshots) were mislaid
[*]they couldn't find any journalist who actually saw the nuclear material
that was apparently 'on police public display', nor could anyone identify the
journalist that photographed the containers - and then...
[*]the nuclear material mysteriously vanished...[/list]If fake 'evidence' was planted before, why not again?[/QUOTE]No, that would be PRO-American Propaganda.

Sorry, I don't remember the uranium in the shoe-box story. Of course I've sleep some since then, but it's not ringing any chimes up there in my penthouse.

Must have hit every amjor US news media except all the ones that people watch...no one I have talked to knows what you are talking about Skunk. You might try to get a broader base for your information, reading through your posts is like reading the statements made by the likes of the Iraqi nformation Ministry.

[ 04-08-2003, 09:13 AM: Message edited by: MagiK ]

[Davros]

Originally posted by Lil Lil: Quote: Originally posted by Skunk: Leastways when we've had enough time to plant some...

OOF! [img]graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

I've been waiting for this to come out. [/QUOTE]I don't see why we don't just go and plant some - there are elements that are always going to believe that if any are found they were planted, so lets just go and plant some and get the "discovery" over and done with.

On that factory where they were claiming Sarin and had soldiers coming out through decontamination - I heard that was proven to be industrial pesticides only.

[John D Harris]

Originally posted by Skunk: Quote: Skunk, I think you listen to way to much anti-american propaganda.

You mean I read the speeches by Bush and co?

But seriously, there was an awful lot of planted and fabricated evidence to start this war. And when the public saw through that, rhetoric and distorted history was used instead as a justification.

Don't you remember the 'uranium in a shoebox' scam that was ran in Sept2002? It hit every major US news network - but not a single international one. Then some British and Austrialian reporters began to do some investigating over the US scare story and got suspicious when:

[*]the driver of the taxi 'disappeared'
[*]the taxi that supposed to have carried them totally destroyed in an 'arson' attack in the
police compound
[*]the suspects mysteriously vanished
[*]the suspects records (fingerprints and mugshots) were mislaid
[*]they couldn't find any journalist who actually saw the nuclear material
that was apparently 'on police public display', nor could anyone identify the
journalist that photographed the containers - and then...
[*]the nuclear material mysteriously vanished...[/list]If fake 'evidence' was planted before, why not again?[/QUOTE]I remember that, but I also remeber that it was the PRESS that went NUTS over it not the US goverment or the CIA. The CIA said they were looking into it and checking it out, NOT it WAS evidence, but they were checking it out. Which is exactly what their job is, check stuff out. The CIA doesn't have to tell the public of everything they find out, if they did they would be stupid. Just because they let the press run with something doesn't mean squat, other then the PRESS ran with something. Remember the Press DOES NOT run this country, even though they think they are the fourth branch of goverment. Remember the Press is nothing but gossips, THAT is THEIR JOB!.
There was no fake evidence planted just a story about somebody trying to plant it. Which proves that it wasn't successful and the system works, his planting was caught. Now if you think just because the CIA didn't come out and say much on the subject, means they are in on it, then so be it. I must also be in on it too, and I'm just and old country boy, I knew that the story about a taxi driver hauling a shoebox of Uranium, across the desert was bunk. I guess that makes me part of the conspiracy, because I didn't run out and have a big press conference right then!
Distorted histroy? BS skunk I've listed several times many links from multible sources both the press and non press sources that have stompted this distorted history BS. It out there on this forum in different threads, take the time to find it, personaly I tired of of reposting the links. You find them and prove them wrong.