![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Symbol of Cyric
![]() Join Date: October 21, 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Age: 36
Posts: 1,143
|
Either Mozilla (normal) or Firfox... The only advantage of FF over MZ that I've noticed is that FF looks better. I haven't seen any advantages of IE over those... [img]tongue.gif[/img]
__________________
[img]\"http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/4763/callumavataranimated4ff.gif\" alt=\" - \" /> |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Jack Burton
![]() Join Date: November 10, 2001
Location: Bathurst & Orange, in constant flux
Age: 38
Posts: 5,452
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
20th Level Warrior
![]() Join Date: December 28, 2003
Location: Kentucky
Age: 39
Posts: 2,820
|
I use ordinary Mozilla...should I switch to Firefox?
__________________
Is that what you really want to say? |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Dracolisk
![]() Join Date: November 1, 2002
Location: Australia ..... G\'day!
Posts: 6,123
|
Ive been using firefox for about three days now and I quite like it though I have a few very small problems that some of you may help with.
1) some sites load a little slower than with IE and are very jerky while loading. 2) I use a mouse with a scrolling wheel in the middle to scan pages, it does not seem to work with firefox. But the good news is that my homepage has not been hijacked yet ![]()
__________________
![]() fossils - natures way of laughing at creationists for over 3 billion years |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Fzoul Chembryl
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: July 16, 2003
Location: Wa\'eni\'n
Age: 39
Posts: 1,701
|
Firefox also loads in sites more efficiently. Faster browsing for you! I certainly notice this with my 20kb/s speed.
__________________
God is in the rain. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Ironworks Moderator
![]() Join Date: February 28, 2001
Location: Boston/Sydney
Posts: 11,771
|
I use Firefox as my default browser, although I have to use IE for anything with ActiveX as Firefox doesn't handle it well, and I still have to do most of my banking via IE.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |||
Jack Burton
![]() Join Date: November 10, 2001
Location: Bathurst & Orange, in constant flux
Age: 38
Posts: 5,452
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Find your profile folder. And you can have many, anywhere on your harddrive. Open the file prefs.js Add a line to it, or edit a line, depending on a similar line is already there (and prefs.js is non-whitespace sensitive). All prefs.js and user.js lines look almost identical. Mark prefs.js as read-only. This also means that it would have to bypass the writelock that Firefox has on prefs.js while it's running. It IS possible to do it this way: Find the profile folder. Open user.js Add or change that same line Firefox does not maintain a write lock on user.js, but this will not lock the homepage in place. This is because all preferences are stored in prefs.js, and user.js is only used for the user to manually add settings. And there is no sure way to find the profile folder, unless the user is still using the default profile. You can start Firefox with a command line switch to use a different profile, which means that this location is only stored as a variable in Firefox. So, a script would have to read all the memory that Firefox controls, find where this particular variable starts and stops (and it can be of arbitrary length), and then read it's exact value. There is no way to know what Firefox calls it internally, because the symbols used in programs are different to those used in source code. Making it VERY hard to hijack Firefox's home page, and even harder to lock it in place. And if it does happen, most users are happier browsing to a folder somewhere and changing a file from being read-only than they are to run regedit, find exactly the right key, and heed the warnings they would have been given before the instruction to do it this way. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Jack Burton
![]() Join Date: November 10, 2001
Location: Bathurst & Orange, in constant flux
Age: 38
Posts: 5,452
|
Quote:
1) It is not a web standard. It is just a Microsoft technology to help them take over the world. 2) It is non-portable. Firefox works across many platforms (Windows, MacOS X, Linux, {free, net, open}BSD, Sun Solaris...). ActiveX works only on Windows, which would mean that the developers would need to have a major difference between different versions of the browser. As it stands, the only difference is that it is compiled differently. 3) It is not secure. ActiveX is responsible for 50% of IE's well-documented security holes. And no, disabling ActiveX in IE won't fix these since websites can use javascript to re-enable it. Ok, not Javascript. Microsoft-warped Javascript. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Jack Burton
![]() Join Date: November 10, 2001
Location: Bathurst & Orange, in constant flux
Age: 38
Posts: 5,452
|
Ok, as promised, some Firefox speedup tweaks.
Firstly, the following code goes in user.js (as described in the link above): code:user_pref("browser.xul.error_pages.enabled", true);[/QUOTE]You may need to tweak the values of nglayout.initialpaint.delay , content.notify.interval , content.switch.threshold and content.notify.backoffcount to suit your setup. Windows XP users can also start Firefox with the commandline switch /prefetch:1 , which will do remarkable things aswell. Just right click your shortcut to it, go Properties, and where it says |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Elminster
![]() Join Date: August 16, 2002
Location: Scotland
Age: 40
Posts: 401
|
I use it. At first I really didn't like it as I felt (and sometimes still do) that it is a bit slower than IEX. But I got over it and liked the rest of the features it added.
__________________
A Knight is sworn to darkness. <br />His heart knows only hatred.<br />His sword destroys the helpless,<br />His might imprisons the weak.<br />His wrath upholds the wicked, <br />His word speaks only lies.<br /><br /> [img]\"http://www.boomspeed.com/niadh/newiwsig.jpg\" alt=\" - \" /> |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mozilla? | Bithron | General Discussion | 3 | 09-22-2006 12:35 PM |
Security update to Mozilla Firefox | VulcanRider | General Discussion | 8 | 03-05-2005 12:39 PM |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 is Out! | LennonCook | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 13 | 12-12-2004 07:12 AM |
Mozilla | Callum | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 33 | 11-02-2004 05:17 AM |
RE: Mozilla Firefox | Dundee Slaytern | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 4 | 04-19-2004 10:21 AM |