![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Very Mad Bird
![]() Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Breukelen (over the river from New Amsterdam)
Age: 53
Posts: 9,246
|
Oh, one more thing Illumina, using that definition of yours, DIRECTING is actually an action. You can limit sexual desire, distract it, direct it, give in to it, and fulfil it. That definition supports what I'm saying, not contradicts.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Very Mad Bird
![]() Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Breukelen (over the river from New Amsterdam)
Age: 53
Posts: 9,246
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Baaz Draconian
![]() Join Date: May 21, 2004
Location: Here, or there abouts.
Age: 80
Posts: 703
|
If by we defined a persons sexuality by action and not desire we wouldn't have seperate words for celibate and asexual. Someone who doesn't have sex is celibate. Someone who doesn't feel the desire to have sex is asexual.
Quote:
__________________
A stitch in time is worth two in the bush. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Very Mad Bird
![]() Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Breukelen (over the river from New Amsterdam)
Age: 53
Posts: 9,246
|
Nope. This is what asexual means:
asex·u·al 1 : lacking sex or functional sex organs (asexual plants) 2 a : involving or reproducing by reproductive processes (as cell division, spore formation, fission, or budding) that do not involve the union of individuals or germ cells (asexual reproduction) (an asexual generation) b : produced by asexual reproduction (asexual spores) 3 : devoid of sexuality (an asexual relationship) This is celibacy: cel·i·ba·cy 1 : the state of not being married 2 a : abstention from sexual intercourse b : abstention by vow from marriage An asexual person could have desire, they just wouldn't have the organs to fulfill that desire. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Very Mad Bird
![]() Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Breukelen (over the river from New Amsterdam)
Age: 53
Posts: 9,246
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Baaz Draconian
![]() Join Date: May 21, 2004
Location: Here, or there abouts.
Age: 80
Posts: 703
|
Quote:
__________________
A stitch in time is worth two in the bush. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Very Mad Bird
![]() Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Breukelen (over the river from New Amsterdam)
Age: 53
Posts: 9,246
|
Why are we distracting the topic from the plight of homosexual palestinians might I add?
Under MY definition, certain Palestinians have commited NO CRIME. I would dare say, under Islamic law, that is the same thing. The ACTION is what is spoken against. The Torah, the law of Moses, speaks about the action of men sleeping together as with a woman as being a crime, not any desire. It is Jesus, who comes along later and says there's no difference between ones thoughts and ones actions, but this is to highlight we're all guilty of sin in Gods eyes, not to redifine the language. The question is, what is "guilty" under Islamic law. Shaol Gannons statment reflects what I'm saying. There are people who are guilty of nothing, even under harsh Islamic law. http://www.al-fatiha.net/pamphlet.html Quote:
A person can be a practicing homosexual, and still be a commited Christian receiving Jesus gace. The whole notion of Jesus grace is that once you accept it, you are forgiven of any and every sin: past, present, future; intentional, nonintentional, sins of omission, sins of comission. The old testament may condemn it, but Jesus has forgiven it. However, I don't see how you could be a practicing homosexual, AND commited Muslim, unless you distort or ignore the applicable teachings, because Islam IS a religion where your actions define you. A "good muslim" is one who sticks to the path. Very problematic. That's why I don't see a solution, short of either a massive reformation, or mass conversion to the Christian message of: "All is permissible, but not all is beneficial" [ 08-12-2004, 11:57 AM: Message edited by: Yorick ] |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Very Mad Bird
![]() Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Breukelen (over the river from New Amsterdam)
Age: 53
Posts: 9,246
|
Quote:
[ 08-12-2004, 11:52 AM: Message edited by: Yorick ] |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pro-Jan society | pritchke | Baldurs Gate II: Shadows of Amn & Throne of Bhaal | 7 | 11-05-2002 12:04 AM |
THE JON LOVERS SOCIETY!! | Balhifet | Baldurs Gate II: Shadows of Amn & Throne of Bhaal | 1 | 11-05-2002 12:03 AM |
The Anti-Society Society | Angelousss | Baldurs Gate II: Shadows of Amn & Throne of Bhaal | 26 | 10-30-2002 01:43 AM |
Proof that an armed society is a polite society. | The Hunter of Jahanna | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 40 | 10-23-2002 11:44 PM |
the Elven Society | Avatar | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 17 | 11-02-2001 10:33 AM |