05-13-2003, 11:56 AM | #121 | |
Zhentarim Guard
Join Date: February 24, 2003
Location: Indiana
Age: 61
Posts: 358
|
Quote:
No, while it is in the state's interest to whitewash their role in racism, the fact is that they are called Jim Crow Laws for a reason -- they were laws, for pete's sake. I can't make laws. You can't make laws. Only governments make laws... The sanitizing of the government's involvement in racism makes the retouching of Soviet history utterly trivial. Abe Lincoln is touted as a hero for freeing slaves, when he did nothing of the sort, and in fact, voted for a law banning free Negros from settling in Illinois, and supported an initiative to ship every black back to Africa and drop them off. The amazing part is that the Soviet cititizens by and large did not forget the faces of those who were airbrushed out of the pictures, while the people in supposedly free countries seem to have an infinite capacity for forgetfullness... |
|
05-13-2003, 11:57 AM | #122 |
Very Mad Bird
Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Breukelen (over the river from New Amsterdam)
Age: 52
Posts: 9,246
|
Originally posted by MagiK:
Bull hockey! Im a non-smoker and I have never once had anyone "Force" me to breathe smoke. And Ill bet neither have you...I will bet that every single time..you had an option to leave. Unless some of those smooching smokers had you tied up.... in that case you should have taken preemptive action to keep yer butt out of there. And now the shoe is on the other foot. Can those that dished it aout all these years take it? can the government tell you which legal activities you can allow on your premises. Prostitution, gambling, marijuana smoking, tobacco smoking, public sex, erotic dancing. Are you suggesting a democratic government can't legislate on any of these? How are you defining legal? It's the same democratic government that makes them legal or illegal? Would it help if we the people made tobacco smoking as illegal as marijuana smoking? Would that make everything allright by your standards? Sorry can't speak as a smoker..not one..never have been. Again we were talkig about private establishments having the right to decide if they will or will not allow smoking..what is so hard for those against smoking to just stay the F%^* out of smoking establishments?...wait I already know..."but I want to go there cause its where all the really cool kids hang out" give it up, you don't have the right to dictate to business owners..and neither should the state. We do have the right to dictate to buisness owners. There are SAFETY laws, regarding fire escapes, ventilation, hours of business, noise restrictions, serving drunks, access for disabled, underage drinking, structure of building etc etc etc. Considering public health is at risk, the smoking ban should be considered a health restriction like any other. Restrictions on private enterprises oppen to the public is all around you Magik. Wake up and smell the coffee. |
05-13-2003, 11:58 AM | #123 | |
Very Mad Bird
Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Breukelen (over the river from New Amsterdam)
Age: 52
Posts: 9,246
|
Quote:
No, while it is in the state's interest to whitewash their role in racism, the fact is that they are called Jim Crow Laws for a reason -- they were laws, for pete's sake. I can't make laws. You can't make laws. Only governments make laws... The sanitizing of the government's involvement in racism makes the retouching of Soviet history utterly trivial. Abe Lincoln is touted as a hero for freeing slaves, when he did nothing of the sort, and in fact, voted for a law banning free Negros from settling in Illinois, and supported an initiative to ship every black back to Africa and drop them off. The amazing part is that the Soviet cititizens by and large did not forget the faces of those who were airbrushed out of the pictures, while the people in supposedly free countries seem to have an infinite capacity for forgetfullness... [/QUOTE]Have you heard of baseball? Have you heard of the Negro league? |
|
05-13-2003, 12:01 PM | #124 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yorick, you may quote me in your post, but you may not mis-quote me or change the text to chjange its meaning or take it out of context..please undo your little edit above so that the purple actually reflects what I did post.
|
05-13-2003, 12:05 PM | #125 | |
Very Mad Bird
Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Breukelen (over the river from New Amsterdam)
Age: 52
Posts: 9,246
|
Quote:
The smoking ban doesn't create the same restrictions on a smoker. So mind telling me what the big deal is? See, I've answered. Mind answering what's so tough about stepping outside for two minutes? |
|
05-13-2003, 12:08 PM | #126 | |
Very Mad Bird
Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Breukelen (over the river from New Amsterdam)
Age: 52
Posts: 9,246
|
Quote:
In any case, I have a requent. Could you please NOT include your reply in the quote box? If you made one structured reply instead of splitting it there wouldn't be an issue. One click quote. Thanks. [ 05-13-2003, 12:14 PM: Message edited by: Yorick ] |
|
05-13-2003, 12:16 PM | #127 | |
Zhentarim Guard
Join Date: February 24, 2003
Location: Indiana
Age: 61
Posts: 358
|
Quote:
And as a non-smoker, I don't have to go outside, anyway. In fact, I don't even go out anymore, because smoking irritates me, too. But I don't try to make everyone adapt to the way Thorfinn would like the world to be because I am not that damned selfish. Try to show a little consideration for someone other than yourself... [ 05-13-2003, 12:19 PM: Message edited by: Thorfinn ] |
|
05-13-2003, 12:26 PM | #128 | |
Very Mad Bird
Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Breukelen (over the river from New Amsterdam)
Age: 52
Posts: 9,246
|
Quote:
And as a non-smoker, I don't have to go outside, anyway. In fact, I don't even go out anymore, because smoking irritates me, too. But I don't try to make everyone adapt to the way Thorfinn would like the world to be because I am not that damned selfish. Try to show a little consideration for someone other than yourself... [/QUOTE]You completely and conveniently ignored the big issue of the single Mom who can't get a job anywhere else. Or the student who can't work anywhere else while studying. I am being considerate. This is people being forced to destroy their health so they can pay rent, eat or provide for a child. That is the biggest reason this has been done. To provide a safe WORKPLACE. |
|
05-13-2003, 12:28 PM | #129 |
Very Mad Bird
Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Breukelen (over the river from New Amsterdam)
Age: 52
Posts: 9,246
|
Thorfinn, yet again you've avoided answering the question.
What is so tough about walking outside for two minutes? Don't attempt to comeback with a "what's so tough about staying away" that's a distraction. A straw man. Answer the question. |
05-13-2003, 12:34 PM | #130 |
Very Mad Bird
Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Breukelen (over the river from New Amsterdam)
Age: 52
Posts: 9,246
|
And before we go on about the jobless having a choice, has anyone heard the saying "beggars can't be choosers?"
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Timber Loftis your PM box is full! | Xen | General Discussion | 0 | 03-14-2005 01:29 PM |
Timber Loftis | Yorick | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 1 | 08-25-2004 07:27 PM |
Timber Loftis in a Chicago courtroom | antryg | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 41 | 11-14-2002 06:58 PM |