![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#91 |
Ironworks Moderator
![]() Join Date: June 10, 2001
Location: Pasir Ris, Singapore
Age: 42
Posts: 11,063
|
quote: No need to get personal. I am only in this thread because I am debating for the Mage side. You can ignore this thread if you like, nobody is being forced to read it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#92 |
Banned Smartass
![]() Join Date: November 26, 2001
Location: Who cares
Posts: 216
|
The scroll of Antimagic isn't a spell. Its like a potion if I remeber right, so it COULD be done as fast as any spell. If Antimagic thing is cast on a mage with ANY spellslike effects upon them, they are immediatly cancled, and the mage cannot cast more spells. Heck, since we are starting the whole thing awhile in advance for the mage to use triggers ect, the cleric could cast one on himself, then use one on the mage. Done. Mage can't do anything.
I'm pretty sure you can dodge ADHW if your fast enough. I've done it alot. Running out of the area is rather cowardly, but one must do what is neccesary. ![]() There are times when a mage could defeat a cleric, and times a cleric could defeat a mage. Let this bikering part end. It doesn't accomplish anything, since none of us are about to say that we're wrong. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#93 |
Ironworks Moderator
![]() Join Date: June 10, 2001
Location: Pasir Ris, Singapore
Age: 42
Posts: 11,063
|
This must be the third or fourth time I am repeating this already. You cannot cast on an invisible Mage. If the Mage goes invisible while you are casting the scroll, the scroll gets wasted because it gets cancelled.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#94 |
Very Mad Bird
![]() Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Breukelen (over the river from New Amsterdam)
Age: 53
Posts: 9,246
|
quote: Mate you (and others) are missing the subjective nature of the discussion. The Mage is the most powerful for Dundee because that's the style he likes to play. He's found the most success with that class. That's not to say the most powerful class you can play is, say an Archer. It all depends on your playing style and preference. I find these sort of arguments ludicrous, as nothing can be proven or quantified. Endless conjecture and hypothesis. Put a veteran Mage player against a veteren Cleric player or Monk player and you may or may not find one class is dominant. What will that prove? That the player is adept at a computer game, not that the class is superior. Go back to enjoying your game mate. I am. I've nearly finished a Jester (with NPCs) and have just started a solo Stalker. I like the NPCs for the conversant value and variety. Soloing gives a different aspect. Who cares if it's right, wrong, powerful or not. Are you having fun? [img]smile.gif[/img] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#95 |
Banned Smartass
![]() Join Date: November 26, 2001
Location: Who cares
Posts: 216
|
lol so true, that is why I would say that wizard slayer and barbarians have a tie for best class. lol, clerics of helm are next though.
Okay, how is your mage going to know that a cleric is there if they are sanctuaried? Then, breaks sanctuary to hit you with scroll and that beats the crap out of you. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#96 |
Ironworks Moderator
![]() Join Date: June 10, 2001
Location: Pasir Ris, Singapore
Age: 42
Posts: 11,063
|
quote: The act of casting the scroll breaks your Sanctuary. The casting time, as you should know, is not instantaneous. IIRC, the casting time is between 2-3. Enough time for the Mage to simply grab his Staff of Magi and go invisible( assuming that he/she has no defensive measures at all in his/her Contingency/Chain Contingency and Minor Spell Sequencer/Spell Sequencer/Spell Trigger), causing your casting to be interrupted, and the scroll to be wasted. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#97 |
The Magister
![]() Join Date: July 26, 2001
Location: Eastsound, WA, USA
Age: 39
Posts: 120
|
Frankly, if I got hit with the antimagic scroll, I'd just high-tail it out of there with boots of speed. Cowardly, yes, but the wizard isn't a warrior!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#98 |
Elite Waterdeep Guard
![]() Join Date: April 9, 2001
Location: Toms River, NJ, USA
Posts: 42
|
Since this is a cleric mage debate, whats the highest attainable levels of a cleric/mage multiclass in ToB, anyone know? I just want to know if I'm doomed to a measly two level 9/10 spells for the rest of my miserable cleric/mage life!
__________________
I \"Know\" Fear |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#99 |
Dungeon Master
![]() Join Date: December 3, 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 62
|
In the context of BG2, there is a mage spell that can damage oppenents while time is stopped. As long as the high level mage can get off time stop, he is safe.
__________________
<img border=\"0\" alt=\"[1drgat1]\" title=\"\" src=\"graemlins/1drgat1.gif\" /> <br />When you were born you alone cried, <br />and everybody else was happy. <br />Live that when you die, <br />you alone are happy, <br />and everybody else is crying. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#100 |
Ironworks Moderator
![]() Join Date: June 10, 2001
Location: Pasir Ris, Singapore
Age: 42
Posts: 11,063
|
quote: The highest level a multiclassed Cleric/Mage can attain is 25/20. That gives you 2 spell slots for level 9-10 Mage spells. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Clerics V Mages lets rumble !! | wellard | Baldurs Gate II: Shadows of Amn & Throne of Bhaal | 46 | 12-20-2003 12:48 AM |
mages VS Clerics | tom the strong wizzard | Baldurs Gate II: Shadows of Amn & Throne of Bhaal | 9 | 04-23-2002 05:41 AM |
mages vs sorcerer vs clerics | Angry Dwarf | Baldurs Gate II: Shadows of Amn & Throne of Bhaal | 7 | 02-18-2002 05:26 AM |
Discussion: Clerics or Mages/Sorceror? | Barlik Longbeard | Baldurs Gate II: Shadows of Amn & Throne of Bhaal | 3 | 01-25-2002 07:33 PM |
Two Q.'s, thiefes-mages-clerics needed :) | daan | Baldurs Gate II Archives | 1 | 11-09-2001 01:44 PM |