Opinions on my new party idea

[Bonzo]

When reading a post about whether wizards or warriors were better i thought of a pretty neat party. You have:-
A pure mage
2 scpecialist mages of opposite shcools
A pure fighter
A fighter/thief (multiclass)
A fighter/cleric (multiclass)

This would mean you would have 3 pairs of mage fighters meaning you could attack a large enemy group from 3 sides.
Please tell me your opinions on it.


------------------

Bonzo
"the important thing is not to be right or wrong
but to be certain. Being right helps of course."


[This message has been edited by Bonzo (edited 07-14-2001).]

[Leafy]

Sounds ptretty cool; very high on magic though. and mage spells are rather difficult to come by in IWD. you can buy some at stores, but the really choice ones are found (like the one fireball). I'd suggest making one of those pure mages into a Bard simply because they rock in HoW. Fighter Mages are also very powerfull; either multiclass or a dualclassed human fighter who later decides to become a spellcaster. As for specialists, i'd recommend considering the opositions schools. Diviniation, necromancy and abjuration are a little on the weak side as far as schools go.

[Ronn_Bman]

I've always wanted to try a party of all fighters, but I"ve never been brave enough to try it...lol