Blood Rayne topless in Playboy???

[Hivetyrant]

Well, I havnt heard anymore, but if I see anything I will share.....Maybe

[Dron_Cah]

Ah. Well, truthfully, I am much relieved. I was afraid man had reached another milestone of degradation. Close one!

[Hivetyrant]

Well, if seeing her in Playboy isnt enough, then maybe [URL+http://www.horrorchannel.com/dread/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=20]this[/URL] will tickle your fancy

[Bozos of Bones]

URL+, should be URL=.
Well, this is certainly going to be interesting...

[Hivetyrant]

Originally posted by Hivetyrant: Well, if seeing her in Playboy isnt enough, then maybe this will tickle your fancy

*EDIT Thanks Bozos

[Darkman]

Am I the only one who is disappointed that they are using a real life model for this issue? I was at first impressed that Playboy would branch out so far as to try something revolutionary like doing a spread with a computer animated woman, but of course they are incapbable of breaking out of the same tired formulaic crap they peddle. But damn, they could have at least picked a better RL model to pose as Bloodrayne. I wasn't at all impressed with Kristinna Loken in Terminator 3. Even with the ridiculous push-up bra she was wearing in the movie she still fell far short of spectacular if you ask me. I honestly see way hotter girls than her on campus every day.

How typical of Playboy to pass up a great opportunity like this only to select a B-rate actrice with average Hollywood looks. Even if a pixelated chick wouldn't have appealed to everyone, it would have at least been something different. That magazine needs a major dosage of fresh air. I can't see why so many people still support the crap they put out.

[Luvian]

Originally posted by Darkman: Am I the only one who is disappointed that they are using a real life model for this issue? I was at first impressed that Playboy would branch out so far as to try something revolutionary like doing a spread with a computer animated woman, but of course they are incapbable of breaking out of the same tired formulaic crap they peddle. But damn, they could have at least picked a better RL model to pose as Bloodrayne. I wasn't at all impressed with Kristinna Loken in Terminator 3. Even with the ridiculous push-up bra she was wearing in the movie she still fell far short of spectacular if you ask me. I honestly see way hotter girls than her on campus every day. How typical of Playboy to pass up a great opportunity like this only to select a B-rate actrice with average Hollywood looks. Even if a pixelated chick wouldn't have appealed to everyone, it would have at least been something different. That magazine needs a major dosage of fresh air. I can't see why so many people still support the crap they put out.

Why would they put picture of naked cg character in playboy? Even on the net there are very few people that would like that, it certainly wouldn't be a success with playboy's customers...

[Oblivion437]

Well, Pederasses and cG porn consumers need something to look at too, and the naked pictures of Lara Croft and the Loli-Con sites stop being inspirational sooner or later.

I am being sarcastic...

[Dron_Cah]

Originally posted by Darkman: I can't see why so many people still support the crap they put out.

Well, friend, I'm hoping I don't upset anyone here when I say the answer is very simple: Masturbation. There very few other easons to buy a PLAYBOY MAGAZINE. As for the whole, "Loken isn't hot enough..." Well, i dunno what standards everyone holds here, but she seems liek a very attractive woman to me. Have I seen women who are more appealing to me? yes, of course. but, from what little I've seen, I think it's usually people who are in their 15 minutes that pose in playboy. Just my 2 cents. (Also, if any mods are offended by "masturbation," I have no problem editing it out, or you doing so.) [img]smile.gif[/img]

[aleph_null1]

You're being intentionally crude, Dron_Cah

One buys Playboy to look at beautiful people, no more, no less.

There's real pornography for the rest...