Visit the Ironworks Gaming Website Email the Webmaster Graphics Library Rules and Regulations Help Support Ironworks Forum with a Donation to Keep us Online - We rely totally on Donations from members Donation goal Meter

Ironworks Gaming Radio

Ironworks Gaming Forum

Go Back   Ironworks Gaming Forum > Ironworks Gaming Forums > General Discussion
FAQ Calendar Arcade Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-10-2003, 03:50 PM   #1
Chewbacca
Zartan
 

Join Date: July 18, 2001
Location: America, On The Beautiful Earth
Age: 51
Posts: 5,373
So if a study is critical of current foreign policy, the school could lose funding? What if the foreign policy is flawwed? Are they scared of critical analysis and dissent? I hope this never becomes a law.

On another note, I love how this right-wing think-tank fellow Kurtz calls programs with veiws he disagrees with "extreme and one-sided" It does give me the opportunity to finally get to use this excellent photo I found on the web:


Link
Quote:
On Oct. 21, the House of Representatives unanimously passed a bill that could require university international studies departments to show more support for American foreign policy or risk their federal funding. Its approval followed hearings this summer in which members of Congress listened to testimony about the pernicious influence of the late Edward Said in Middle Eastern studies departments, described as enclaves of debased anti-Americanism. Stanley Kurtz, a research fellow at the Hoover Institution, a right-wing think tank, testified, "Title VI-funded programs in Middle Eastern Studies (and other area studies) tend to purvey extreme and one-sided criticisms of American foreign policy." Evidently, the House agreed and decided to intervene.
Chewbacca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 04:25 PM   #2
WillowIX
Apophis
 

Join Date: July 10, 2001
Location: By a big blue lake, Canada
Age: 51
Posts: 4,628
Come on Chewwie. You must teach those hippie students that disagreeing with the government is treason and will be dealt with swiftly. [img]tongue.gif[/img]

If someone teaches anti-American values to their students it ought to be the schools' responsibility to deal with that. But frankly university students should be able to form their own opinions regardless of what they hear in classes. If not, they'll be in for a heck of a surprise when they graduate.
__________________
Confuzzled by nature.
WillowIX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 04:31 PM   #3
Timber Loftis
40th Level Warrior
 

Join Date: July 11, 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 11,916
I think teaching Anti-American values is VERY American, and I think most members of the Whig party would agree with me.
__________________
Timber Loftis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 05:52 PM   #4
antryg
Fzoul Chembryl
 

Join Date: August 30, 2002
Location: Dallas, Tx.
Age: 22
Posts: 1,765
Quote:
Originally posted by Timber Loftis:
I think teaching Anti-American values is VERY American, and I think most members of the Whig party would agree with me.
That's strange. I don't even like wigs and I agree with you.

It's funny that nobody complained about my paper "Creeping Capitalism in the Soviet Union" that I wrote in 1972. Phil Gramm was still teaching there then and he didn't mind. Oh that's right, that paper agreed with American governmental worldview. I'll have to try harder next time. Of course Gramm left Texas A&M that year after stating that 18 year olds were just smart enough to follow orders and fight but not smart enough to vote.
__________________
antryg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 06:03 PM   #5
GForce
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by antryg:
quote:
Originally posted by Timber Loftis:
I think teaching Anti-American values is VERY American, and I think most members of the Whig party would agree with me.
That's strange. I don't even like wigs and I agree with you.

It's funny that nobody complained about my paper "Creeping Capitalism in the Soviet Union" that I wrote in 1972. Phil Gramm was still teaching there then and he didn't mind. Oh that's right, that paper agreed with American governmental worldview. I'll have to try harder next time. Of course Gramm left Texas A&M that year after stating that 18 year olds were just smart enough to follow orders and fight but not smart enough to vote.
[/QUOTE][img]graemlins/hehe.gif[/img] Phil Graham can kiss my grits. I used to live in the Lone Star state too and he's no Yoda wiseman eventhough he looks like a giant Yoda OR better yet, Mr Potato Head. [img]tongue.gif[/img]
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 07:00 PM   #6
antryg
Fzoul Chembryl
 

Join Date: August 30, 2002
Location: Dallas, Tx.
Age: 22
Posts: 1,765
Yeah, Phil made his thought provoking remarks for the Houston Chronicle and the next day, there was a demonstration in front of his office by students, many of them in the Corp of Cadets, asking for a clarification of his remarks. Have you ever seen a demonstration of mostly conservative and right wing students against a conservative right wing political thinker. Strangely enough he never returned to the classroom and left his tenured position at A&M to pursue other interests. I would conjecture it was to get away from 18-20 year old students who wanted to show their original thinking and "smarts" to his person.

Just think; if he hadn't been such a complete ass and kept his mouth shut in this instance, the US wouldn't have been subjected to his economic wizardry. A&M's gain was America's loss.
__________________
antryg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 07:07 PM   #7
sultan
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by Timber Loftis:
I think teaching Anti-American values is VERY American, and I think most members of the Whig party would agree with me.
wasnt there a quote from the founding fathers to the effect that it is one's duty to question their government?

as other posts have pointed out, what is anti-american changes over time (reference our relationship with Iraq), which makes enforcement at the very least silly and at the most likely hypocritical.

anyway, if organisations like the KKK are protected by free speech, surely the schools are protected as well?
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 07:11 PM   #8
khazadman
User suspended until [Feb13]
 

Join Date: December 6, 2001
Location: the south side of ol virginny
Age: 64
Posts: 1,172
From what I can see there is very little original thought coming out of the universities. Just a bunch of screaming hippy socialists allowing only their view points are the only ones being taught.
khazadman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2003, 12:00 AM   #9
Azred
Drow Priestess
 

Join Date: March 13, 2001
Location: a hidden sanctorum high above the metroplex
Age: 55
Posts: 4,037
Question Mark

Regardless of the cirriculum specifics or the political leanings of professors, as soon as the Government begins granting support only to schools who "toe the line" then a very dangerous line has been crossed. "Teach what we want you to teach or we'll find a way to hinder you?" [img]graemlins/idontagreeatall.gif[/img] This is called ideological house-cleaning, and has nothing to do with America whatsoever.

I was fortunate enough to have at least one professor who thought like this in his Current Events course. He was quite liberal in his philosophy, but as long as you researched your position and presented logical arguments he didn't care where you stood; he wanted only that you backed your position soundly and avoided logical fallacies, even if you disagreed with him.
__________________
Everything may be explained by a conspiracy theory. All conspiracy theories are true.

No matter how thinly you slice it, it's still bologna.
Azred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2003, 12:39 AM   #10
Chewbacca
Zartan
 

Join Date: July 18, 2001
Location: America, On The Beautiful Earth
Age: 51
Posts: 5,373
Quote:
Originally posted by sultan:
wasnt there a quote from the founding fathers to the effect that it is one's duty to question their government?
Source

"Dissent is the highest form of patriotism."
- President Thomas Jefferson

"It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from the government.
- Thomas Paine

"If ever time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin."
- Samuel Adams

"Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the President."
- President Theodore Roosevelt
__________________
Support Local Music and Record Stores!
Got Liberty?
Chewbacca is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ahh.. freedom Harkoliar General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) 9 04-02-2004 05:54 PM
Freedom Spade General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) 5 05-22-2003 08:29 AM
So the US is promoting freedom... Suzaku General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) 10 04-15-2003 10:21 PM
FREEDOM!!!! Sir Mandorallen General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) 18 06-20-2002 04:24 AM
Freedom Zbyszek General Discussion 6 01-14-2002 06:55 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2024 Ironworks Gaming & ©2024 The Great Escape Studios TM - All Rights Reserved