![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
40th Level Warrior
![]() Join Date: July 11, 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 11,916
|
Seems the EPA is getting trounced these days for not protecting the environment (you know, the name sorta implies it should protect the environment). Here's a sample of today's hit list from the BNA Daily Enviro:
1. The Sierra Club files two suits in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Circuit to challenge EPA rules setting emissions standards for hazardous air pollutants. The Sierra Club charges that the EPA rules for iron and steel manufacturers and for brick and clay manufacturers are "far weaker than the law requires and inadequate." 2. The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington says EPA is required to stop authorizing streamside use of certain pesticides that are harmful to endangered species of salmon. EPA already is under a court order to consult with the National Marine Fisheries Service on the effects of 54 pesticides on endangered salmon. The new order says EPA may continue to approve the use of the pesticides during consultations with the National Marine Fisheries Service under the condition that the approvals do not jeopardize the fish and do not violate the Endangered Species Act. 3. A federal water management plan for the Klamath Basin reclamation project relies on uncertain nonfederal actions to achieve sufficient water flows for salmon, according to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The court also says the plan lacks specificity on the incidental take of Klamath River coho salmon listed under the Endangered Species Act. It remands the plan back to the federal agencies for amendments, but leaves the plan in place during the meantime. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Drizzt Do'Urden
![]() Join Date: October 6, 2001
Location: central coast of Ca.
Age: 78
Posts: 653
|
TL I may a little off your topic but I think another problem with our governments rulings on envi. laws are being ruined by all the "new" suvs'.Almost every auto manufacturer has one or more models,I think it's only because they are less restricted for emisions and gas consuption.Making them cheaper to build and less restricted by epas' laws.More crap in the air.More money for big business,as usual.Help us Ralph Nadar!!
__________________
John |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|