![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Manshoon
![]() Join Date: December 15, 2001
Location: Holland
Age: 37
Posts: 226
|
who is stronger
__________________
What doesnt kill me makes me stronger and wizer, thats how i live. <img border=\"0\" alt=\"[mage1]\" title=\"\" src=\"graemlins/mage1.gif\" /> |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Elminster
![]() Join Date: October 17, 2001
Location: London, England
Age: 41
Posts: 480
|
Ok, heres how it goes;
IMHO, Fighters are stronger because, You can achieve grand mastery in most weapons thus creating Extra Damage and THAC0 and whats with the multipule posts? ![]()
__________________
\"Sarcasm is a sign of genius.\"<br /><br />[url]\"http://www.hellspawnonline.tk\" target=\"_blank\">Hellspawn-Online.tk</a> |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
20th Level Warrior
![]() Join Date: November 16, 2001
Location: Estonia
Age: 36
Posts: 2,775
|
actually, i disagree. take cavalier and kensai as an example. cavalier is much better.
but by stronger, do you mean physically or just better, tom? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Manshoon
![]() Join Date: December 15, 2001
Location: Holland
Age: 37
Posts: 226
|
Both
__________________
What doesnt kill me makes me stronger and wizer, thats how i live. <img border=\"0\" alt=\"[mage1]\" title=\"\" src=\"graemlins/mage1.gif\" /> |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Drow Warrior
![]() Join Date: January 17, 2002
Location: Umapine, OR
Age: 37
Posts: 267
|
Paladins Definitely, because
1)they can heal themselves after hacking and slashing 2)the can use the best weapon in the game So what would you rather have, a fighter totaly depedant on clreics/druids/healing potions o a paladin who can do the things listed above.
__________________
It\'s like a whole other world<br />Where you can smell the food<br />But you can\'t touch the silverware.<br /><br />[url]\"http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?Porkmeister\" target=\"_blank\">http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?Porkmeister</a> |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Manshoon
![]() Join Date: December 15, 2001
Location: Holland
Age: 37
Posts: 226
|
Hmmmmmmmmm........... i think that fighter are the best couz the can specialise beyond normal specialisations!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CYA
__________________
What doesnt kill me makes me stronger and wizer, thats how i live. <img border=\"0\" alt=\"[mage1]\" title=\"\" src=\"graemlins/mage1.gif\" /> |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Zartan
![]() Join Date: October 15, 2001
Location: Oslo, Norway
Age: 36
Posts: 5,367
|
Paladin. Just take the Cavalier; many good abilities and resistances, becomes a good warrior, has access to some Priest-spells and can wield the Carsomyr!
![]() ![]() ![]() That's way Paladins are the best class, IMO. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
The Magister
![]() Join Date: March 12, 2002
Location: Portugal
Posts: 128
|
I agree whit "DragonSlayer25"... "holy avanger" is the best sword I ever had, and in ToB you can make it even better, plus you can have some cool and usefull priest spells... well the only thing good about fighters is the "d'Arnise Hold", witch I think is better then the "radiant heart"...
__________________
_cyber7_ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Elminster
![]() Join Date: March 23, 2002
Location: Lynchburg, Virginia
Age: 40
Posts: 460
|
It depends on your playing style. Paladins are extremely fun, get to heal people, cast priest spells, get saving throw bonuses, can turn undead, and are really nice to people. Various kits can cast a ridiculously high-level Dispel Magic, True Sight, Remove Fear, and are immune to a huge amount of effects, and can use the Holy Avenger (enough of a reason by itself). The drawback is that they're always nice to people and cannot overspecialize. The good side to non-mastery is that you end up able to use many more types of weapons, which is exceedingly useful in ToB, where there are many particlarly nasty dual-weilding combos. Fighters get levels faster, can specialize in weapons much more, and can be downright mean. They sacrifice all of the good paladin stuff for fighting prowess. Playing a paladin is much funner, but playing a fighter gets you a lot more power. It's your choice.
__________________
Yar! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Quintesson
![]() Join Date: January 21, 2002
Location: Thessaloniki,Hellas
Age: 44
Posts: 1,050
|
Again the question should be adressed taking in consideration that in ToB there other weapons as powerfull as Carsomyr and that a fighter levels up faster and as such gets more high level abilities.
I think that palladins are fun but a fighter is the pure killing machine!
__________________
\"Sorrow is the future tense of love\" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
cleric/fighter or fighter/paladin? | White Lancer | Neverwinter Nights 1 & 2 Also SoU & HotU Forum | 9 | 11-10-2005 11:48 AM |
Fighter > Cleric vs. Fighter > Mage | darkmage | Icewind Dale | Heart of Winter | Icewind Dale II Forum | 28 | 10-06-2005 07:39 PM |
Fighter/Illusionst vs Fighter/Mage, SOA only | Klutz | Baldurs Gate II: Shadows of Amn & Throne of Bhaal | 9 | 09-20-2003 04:25 PM |
Monks, Kensai, Paladins, Why not just a trusty fighter? | Titan | Baldurs Gate II Archives | 41 | 03-30-2001 05:35 AM |
Ultimate Fighter (Swashbuckler/fighter) | GameOver | Baldurs Gate II Archives | 1 | 11-22-2000 08:04 PM |