Quote:
Originally Posted by Felix The Assassin
However, here you have gotten away from the issue, and attacked the article, just like Nancy has trained you to do. Stay within the lines, and whatever you do, don't go outside the box. Deny, discredit the story, or the website, or the author, just don't engage in the topic. For the real real issue is the topic, and people calling it for what it is, if it smells like it, smears like it, and it comes from the White House, it must be warmed over crapola, sooner or later, the fit is going to hit the shan, and there will be a movement of people there to observe who catches it.  |
What a crock. Routinely offer not much more than smoke, mirrors, and the boogie man as the topic So the act is like ya got the big secret revealing, only we are so blinded we can't see it but the day will come we'll all be PWWWNZERED? Please! It hurts to laugh this much. STOP!
An amatuer could point out the intellectuial dishonesty in the OP artticle. Smoke and mirrors job no less. Facts are there but they do not connect.
The real issue about it is...
why should I or anyone care about a question being asked, if not to find an actual answer, but to fit a politcally convient pre-concieved answer? Sounds like a method that serves the party member, but not the citizen. In other words if it smells like bullshit, I watch my step so I don't step in it.