And they call it a "victimless crime"

[Cloudbringer]

Originally posted by Q'alooaith: quote: Originally posted by Cloudbringer: Q'alooaith, you're treading the line right now, so I'm giving you a friendly reminder that one of the major rules for this forum is BE CIVIL with other members. You don't have to agree with everyone or with anyone at all nor do you have to like what others say, but you DO have to interact in a civil manner and insulting other members is NOT an option.

Cloudy, a freindly reminder could have come in the form of a PM, which would have got a much better reaction (I've rewritten this post twice already).

I'm being as civil as everyone else, I have not insulted any body intentionaly.
The acusation offends me.


I have been civil, I have respected the views of others, I have dissagreed with engery, as is expected in a discusion, I have made my tirade. what would you have me do diffrently, what exactly is wrong with my reply? [/QUOTE]Q'alooaith, you've pointed out you're intelligent, so I'm sure you can tell when you're insulting someone or baiting them.

Last time I looked, the little hammers were still by name, which means I have to enforce the code of conduct the webmaster set up for IW AND part of that code says

Be Nice: No posting of material that antagonizes, harasses or creates hostility toward another user or group of. If you are angry with someone in the forum, take it up with him/her through private channels like e-mail or PM or ICQ in a respectful manner.

so take it to heart- Don't bait or insult other people here. Your post to Luvian was a taunt (baiting) and your 'dregs' comment was flamebait to those members who have had employment/assitance issues and had posted here.

If you have any more questions about my decision to warn you, please follow protocol and pm me or the webmaster.


In short, don't do it. If you can't excercise some self control in a reply, take it private.

For the record, I post this here to be sure EVERYONE knows that such behavior is not acceptable and this thread will continue only if it stays civil.

[Q'alooaith]

I could take your bait cloudly, but I wont.

[Sigmar]

Originally posted by Q'alooaith: I could take your bait cloudly, but I wont.

First time I've ever seen someone argue with Cloudbringer.


You don't need to support the unemployed, they are all dregs, deserving nothing not even pity.
It's all evolution, the strong survive, the weak perish.

A remarkably ignorant comment on your part. As if many formally unemployed people in the past have never contributed something significant to society.

Oh dear, did I offend your delicate sensiblitys, such a shame. I would pity the women in this situation, but that would imply I have even have any empathy.
*Yawn* Carry on Flame-Baiting, you obviously got some ego to boost.

[Vaskez]

Q'alooaith, for someone who claims to be intelligent (hehe), you don't seem very quick on the uptake. Cloudbringer is a moderator. You know? That means she's not baiting you or arguing with you, she's TELLING you the rules. You keep this up and you go bye-bye. Not that you'd care, I'm just saying.

[Larry_OHF]

Originally posted by Q'alooaith: I could take your bait cloudly, but I wont.

Check your PM box. You have a message.

[Q'alooaith]

Nope, don't see any msg's.

[Larry_OHF]

That is because I sent it to Vaskez instead of you!

Lol! Poor guy.

Sorry Vaskez...I am sure you won't be letting me forget this one.

Anyway...

[johnny]

I wouldn't have a problem with it if i were a woman. Just think about it.....1500 € a week without leaving the comfort of your own bedroom. [img]graemlins/hehe.gif[/img]

[Vaskez]

You've secretly been wanting to have a go at me for ages, admit it

[Q'alooaith]

It's the whole intamacy thing that they don't like Johnny, and the idea that they could end up with somone quite disgusting. Think of the worst person you've ever met, with a terrible personality and bad BO, now immagine having to have sex with them to get paid..

Not such a rosy profession, now is it.