Visit the Ironworks Gaming Website Email the Webmaster Graphics Library Rules and Regulations Help Support Ironworks Forum with a Donation to Keep us Online - We rely totally on Donations from members Donation goal Meter

Ironworks Gaming Radio

Ironworks Gaming Forum

Go Back   Ironworks Gaming Forum > Ironworks Gaming Forums > General Discussion > General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005)
FAQ Calendar Arcade Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-20-2002, 09:44 AM   #21
Ar-Cunin
Ra
 

Join Date: August 14, 2001
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Age: 52
Posts: 2,326
I think he should be prosecuted for copyright-infringements.

You can't sit and edit other peoples work just because you don't agree with the contents [img]graemlins/idontagreeatall.gif[/img]
__________________
Life is a laugh <img border=\"0\" alt=\"[biglaugh]\" title=\"\" src=\"graemlins/biglaugh.gif\" /> - and DEATH is the final joke <img border=\"0\" alt=\"[hehe]\" title=\"\" src=\"graemlins/hehe.gif\" />
Ar-Cunin is offline  
Old 11-20-2002, 09:51 AM   #22
Cloudbringer
Ironworks Moderator
 

Join Date: March 1, 2001
Location: Upstate NY USA
Posts: 19,737
Ar Cunin- that point also worries me. I wonder how the copyright laws see something like that? I mean on American TV we 'bleep' words so is THAT considered 'infringement' on the copyright? It IS editing, but is it damaging to the work as a whole? Should we just not show it on public or publicly accessible stations? Whew, Willow, BIG topic you have here!

Caleb- I have an overwhelming urge to hug you....refraining mightily....but ....aaaaaaaaaaack.....*HUGS CALEB*
__________________
"Don't take life for granted." Animal (may he rest in peace)
Cloudbringer is offline  
Old 11-20-2002, 09:58 AM   #23
Leonis
Symbol of Cyric
 

Join Date: March 6, 2001
Location: Somewhere on Earth - it changes often
Posts: 1,292
Quote:
Originally posted by Cloudbringer:
Ar Cunin- that point also worries me. I wonder how the copyright laws see something like that? I mean on American TV we 'bleep' words so is THAT considered 'infringement' on the copyright? It IS editing, but is it damaging to the work as a whole? Should we just not show it on public or publicly accessible stations? Whew, Willow, BIG topic you have here!

Caleb- I have an overwhelming urge to hug you....refraining mightily....but ....aaaaaaaaaaack.....*HUGS CALEB*
Cloudy I think the bleeping is different because it's momentary and most people know what was said anyway.
With a whole segment cut out, if you haven't seen it before youmay not even be aware there was anything missing in the first place.
Also the artist knows their work will be bleeped when they sell it - if they don't want to allow it to be bleeped they would withhold it.

This is a different case because in buying the movie - you agree not to do what this person has done.
__________________
Better run through the jungle! Grrr...
Leonis is offline  
Old 11-20-2002, 09:58 AM   #24
WillowIX
Apophis
 

Join Date: July 10, 2001
Location: By a big blue lake, Canada
Age: 49
Posts: 4,628
Quote:
Originally posted by Cloudbringer:
Ar Cunin- that point also worries me. I wonder how the copyright laws see something like that? I mean on American TV we 'bleep' words so is THAT considered 'infringement' on the copyright? It IS editing, but is it damaging to the work as a whole? Should we just not show it on public or publicly accessible stations? Whew, Willow, BIG topic you have here!

Caleb- I have an overwhelming urge to hug you....refraining mightily....but ....aaaaaaaaaaack.....*HUGS CALEB*
I didn´t even consider that part! But it is a VERYgood point! [img]graemlins/thumbsup.gif[/img] If I were to retort immediately I´d say it´s not quite the same thing. Editing out a bad word from an interview (documentaries don´t tend to have bleeps, at least not up here) is not the same as editing out scenes from a piece of art (a movie ). If I were to make a comparison. Hmm perhaps it´s like covering up certain body parts on a painting? And I´m glad the mood changed in here! [img]smile.gif[/img] YAY IW!
__________________
Confuzzled by nature.
WillowIX is offline  
Old 11-20-2002, 10:10 AM   #25
MagiK
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
The editng of works of art has always disturbed me, while what I consider art may differ greatly from others, I think Americans in particular are warping our kids by covering up the David or parts of Venus Demilo, while allowing them to see people being shot on tv on a regular basis. I really do not understand why we allow violence but deny healthy sexuality and the beauty of the human form.

Edit: And don't even get me started about the schools declaring The works of Mark Twain and Ol Bill Shakespere as being innappropriate for children. Heaven forbid we allow our children to see how the world really used to be.


[ 11-20-2002, 10:13 AM: Message edited by: MagiK ]
 
Old 11-20-2002, 10:15 AM   #26
Attalus
Symbol of Bane
 

Join Date: November 26, 2001
Location: Texas
Age: 75
Posts: 8,167
Quote:
Originally posted by MagiK:
The editng of works of art has always disturbed me, while what I consider art may differ greatly from others, I think Americans in particular are warping our kids by covering up the David or parts of Venus Demilo, while allowing them to see people being shot on tv on a regular basis. I really do not understand why we allow violence but deny healthy sexuality and the beauty of the human form.
Couldn't agree more, MagiK. I have never understood why you can depict a hundred grisly homicides in an hour on TV (or elsewhere!) and one uncovered female breast would make nationwide headlines.
Attalus is offline  
Old 11-20-2002, 10:20 AM   #27
Timber Loftis
40th Level Warrior
 

Join Date: July 11, 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 11,916
Continuing to go [img]graemlins/offtopic.gif[/img] but I just thought this might be of interest:

Mormons have not practiced polygamy since the Supreme Court disbanded the church for doing so, and took its assets (those that weren't hidden). Years later, the church was reinstated, and property was returned - on the notion that the church had reformed its view of polygamy. There were 4 in total Supreme Court cases on it. It's been a while since I've read them, but http://candst.tripod.com/caselist.htm says they were:


1878 P U.S. Reynolds v U S, 98 U.S. 145 First of the Mormon cases and was decided under civil law, First mention of Jefferson's metaphor (Wall of Separation)
1885 B U.S. Murphey v Ramsey, 144 U.S. 15 Another of the Mormon cases (cited 3 times in The Myth of Separation)
1890 P / B U.S. Davis v Beason, 133 U.S. 333 Basically part of the overall Mormon cases Bigamy polygamy cases followed the Reynolds reasoning i.e., civil law. (cited 5 times in The Myth of Separation)
1890 P U.S. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints v US, 136 U.S. 1 Last of the Mormon cases

This was an issue when I was working at legislative counsel in VT, which was drafting VT's civil union. A big question legislators has was "if we open the door to other types of marriages, how do we say NO when people come looking to legalize other things, like polygamy."

Sorry to be offtopic, just an FYI.

[ 11-20-2002, 10:21 AM: Message edited by: Timber Loftis ]
__________________
Timber Loftis is offline  
Old 11-20-2002, 10:23 AM   #28
Leonis
Symbol of Cyric
 

Join Date: March 6, 2001
Location: Somewhere on Earth - it changes often
Posts: 1,292
Quote:
Originally posted by MagiK:
The editng of works of art has always disturbed me, while what I consider art may differ greatly from others, I think Americans in particular are warping our kids by covering up the David or parts of Venus Demilo, while allowing them to see people being shot on tv on a regular basis. I really do not understand why we allow violence but deny healthy sexuality and the beauty of the human form.

Edit: And don't even get me started about the schools declaring The works of Mark Twain and Ol Bill Shakespere as being innappropriate for children. Heaven forbid we allow our children to see how the world really used to be.
It's a slanted approach for sure. Can't be doing too much good for society. "Killing's ok, sex is bad..."
Personally I think depictions of sex and violence in current medias and arts are largely gratuitous any unneccessary anyway. But that's the lure of the $$$ for you...
__________________
Better run through the jungle! Grrr...
Leonis is offline  
Old 11-20-2002, 10:25 AM   #29
Timber Loftis
40th Level Warrior
 

Join Date: July 11, 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 11,916
Quote:
Originally posted by Attalus:
quote:
Originally posted by MagiK:
The editng of works of art has always disturbed me, while what I consider art may differ greatly from others, I think Americans in particular are warping our kids by covering up the David or parts of Venus Demilo, while allowing them to see people being shot on tv on a regular basis. I really do not understand why we allow violence but deny healthy sexuality and the beauty of the human form.
Couldn't agree more, MagiK. I have never understood why you can depict a hundred grisly homicides in an hour on TV (or elsewhere!) and one uncovered female breast would make nationwide headlines. [/QUOTE]Agreed guys. Moreover, it's ridiculous considering the new trends among the tummy-bared body-shaven multi-pierced teens of today. Younger singers and actors are doing more risque things, and MTV is happy to show a 15-year-old in an ass-high skirt dancing seductively. Yet, we have to edit Looney Toons. Is there no end to the silliness?
__________________
Timber Loftis is offline  
Old 11-20-2002, 10:27 AM   #30
Rokenn
Galvatron
 

Join Date: January 22, 2002
Location: california wine country
Age: 60
Posts: 2,193
Quote:
Originally posted by MagiK:
The editng of works of art has always disturbed me, while what I consider art may differ greatly from others, I think Americans in particular are warping our kids by covering up the David or parts of Venus Demilo, while allowing them to see people being shot on tv on a regular basis. I really do not understand why we allow violence but deny healthy sexuality and the beauty of the human form.

Edit: And don't even get me started about the schools declaring The works of Mark Twain and Ol Bill Shakespere as being innappropriate for children. Heaven forbid we allow our children to see how the world really used to be.
ack! I actually agree with you on this Magik. Will wonders never cease!
__________________
“This is an impressive crowd, the haves and the have mores. <br />Some people call you the elite. <br />I call you my base.”<br />~ George W. Bush (2000)
Rokenn is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Breaking the Oil Chain Timber Loftis General Discussion 28 11-03-2004 12:38 PM
Breaking of the Glass Ceiling Timber Loftis General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) 11 02-07-2003 12:20 PM
Why do my weapons keep breaking?! n00body Baldurs Gate & Tales of the Sword Coast 1 08-22-2002 01:04 PM
Viconia's breaking up Rovena Baldurs Gate II: Shadows of Amn & Throne of Bhaal 1 07-03-2002 06:07 PM
I'll post Breaking news when I can here. Ziroc General Discussion 0 10-11-2001 12:48 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2024 Ironworks Gaming & ©2024 The Great Escape Studios TM - All Rights Reserved