09-11-2010, 08:45 PM | #1 |
Ironworks Moderator
Join Date: March 1, 2001
Location: Midlands, South Carolina
Age: 48
Posts: 14,759
|
Crap! I have some old Polonium in my possession!
I found an old brush used to clean static off of camera lenses and stuff, and saw a warning label on it that said not to touch the Polonium strip on the inside and to replace after July 1992. I did a quick Google on it and found that this contains a serious amount of the radioactive metal, but that it should be incased in some kind of protective coating...however...why else would the warning label say to replace by 1992 than to warn me that it could get more dangerous with time?
Should I just toss it in the trash or is there some special way to dispose of it now that it's old? quote from Wikipedia: Potentially lethal amounts of polonium are present in anti-static brushes sold to photographers.[54] Many of the devices are available by mail order. General Electric markets a static eliminator module with 500 µCi (20 MBq), roughly 2.5 times the lethal dose of 210Po if 100%-ingested, for US$79;[55] Staticmaster sells replacement units with the same amount (500 µCi) of 210Po for US$36.[56] In USA, the devices with no more than 500 µCi of (sealed) 210Po per unit can be bought in any amount under a "general license"[57] which means that a buyer need not be registered by any authorities: the general license "is effective without the filing of an application with the Commission or the issuance of a licensing document to a particular person." If these sources were used to collect the amount of polonium likely used in the poisoning—and one could devise a method of separating the polonium from its protective casing—it would take 10–100 modules for price of US$360 to US$7,100. That such a thing could be done is extremely difficult according to the manufacturers[citation needed] and would be highly dangerous to anyone attempting to do so without some special equipment like a glovebox. Potentially lethal amounts of polonium are present in anti-static brushes sold to photographers.[54] Many of the devices are available by mail order. General Electric markets a static eliminator module with 500 µCi (20 MBq), roughly 2.5 times the lethal dose of 210Po if 100%-ingested, for US$79;[55] Staticmaster sells replacement units with the same amount (500 µCi) of 210Po for US$36.[56] In USA, the devices with no more than 500 µCi of (sealed) 210Po per unit can be bought in any amount under a "general license"[57] which means that a buyer need not be registered by any authorities: the general license "is effective without the filing of an application with the Commission or the issuance of a licensing document to a particular person." If these sources were used to collect the amount of polonium likely used in the poisoning—and one could devise a method of separating the polonium from its protective casing—it would take 10–100 modules for price of US$360 to US$7,100. That such a thing could be done is extremely difficult according to the manufacturers[citation needed] and would be highly dangerous to anyone attempting to do so without some special equipment like a glovebox. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polonium
__________________
Last edited by Larry_OHF; 09-11-2010 at 08:47 PM. |
09-11-2010, 09:00 PM | #2 | ||
Lord Soth
Join Date: July 25, 2002
Location: Melbourne FL
Age: 59
Posts: 1,971
|
Re: Crap! I have some old Polonium in my possession!
Sounds like you're ok as long as you don't eat the brush -- "100% ingested" ?? If you're worried about disposing of it just email the manufacturer. Why would they want you to dispose of it? Maybe so they can sell you a new one?
A quick Google found this link on the International Atomic Energy site that says: Quote:
Quote:
__________________
----- Help feed animals in shelters with just a mouse click at The Animal Rescue Site !! |
||
09-11-2010, 09:52 PM | #3 |
Ironworks Moderator
Join Date: March 1, 2001
Location: Midlands, South Carolina
Age: 48
Posts: 14,759
|
Re: Crap! I have some old Polonium in my possession!
Thanks for the reply! That makes me feel better about it. It takes somebody else reading the same stuff to get a different take on it, and I missed what you picked up on.
__________________
|
09-12-2010, 07:21 PM | #4 |
Ironworks Moderator
Join Date: March 1, 2001
Location: Upstate NY USA
Posts: 19,737
|
Re: Crap! I have some old Polonium in my possession!
Larry, sounds like it is ok. Glad to hear it!
VulcanRider- that sig cartoon is .....perfect! LOL
__________________
"Don't take life for granted." Animal (may he rest in peace) |
09-13-2010, 09:41 AM | #5 |
40th Level Warrior
Join Date: July 11, 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 11,916
|
Re: Crap! I have some old Polonium in my possession!
You have, what?, 1/40th the polonium in the brush that you did back in 1992?
Anyway, legal answer: what you have is an amount of polonium that is produced in extremely small amounts, and is considered by the NRC to be an exempt quantity for regulatory purposes. http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-co.../polonium.html So just throw it away. Or keep it. Whatever you want. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Build-a-Bears found in possession.... | Firestormalpha | General Discussion | 2 | 07-05-2009 05:17 PM |
Where the crap is everyone? | Hivetyrant | General Discussion | 70 | 04-22-2005 11:15 AM |
CRAP CRAP CRAP I hate being so indecisive! A problem when going to purchase thief 3. | Sythe | Miscellaneous Games (RPG or not) | 6 | 05-31-2004 06:32 PM |
Guy busted for pot possession.... | Rokenn | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 17 | 03-10-2004 11:00 AM |
Clinton Arrested for Cocaine Possession! | Djinn Raffo | General Discussion | 29 | 12-28-2003 07:59 PM |