09-23-2003, 11:46 AM | #11 | |
Vampire
Join Date: April 28, 2001
Location: Cambridge
Age: 40
Posts: 3,877
|
Quote:
From where I am standing, there are women scientsist everywhere. Yet, all breakthroughs are made by men. We are talking about this year 2003. Not 1800s
__________________
<b>ʆë®Ñï†Ý \'s Avariel<br /></b><br />Creator and Mithril Protector of the ALSB Clan <br /> [img]\"http://www.wizardrealm.com/images/avatar.gif\" alt=\" - \" /> |
|
09-23-2003, 11:52 AM | #12 |
Dungeon Master
Join Date: September 19, 2003
Location: Gibraltar
Age: 37
Posts: 57
|
you're thinking about something totally different, i'm trying to say that it hasn't been that long since woman scientists have been around, not that there aren't any now, there's probably equally as much woman scientists as men, if you want to know why the havn't accomplished as much academic breakthroughs then i simply don't know
__________________
<br />Naruto!! ^____^;;<br /><br />\"Thinking of a witty signature is the <br />least of my worries...\" |
09-23-2003, 12:10 PM | #13 | |
Dracolisk
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Age: 43
Posts: 6,541
|
Quote:
Women are vain, spend more time on how they look and what to cook and therefore have less time to do scientific research? That is just so amazingly sexist! Especially the addition that you're glad women are vain because you "dislike girls who don't know how to take care of their image"! My goodness... First, FYI I manage to be both one of the best students in my class AND look good. [img]tongue.gif[/img] I get up, I put on my mascara and my frilly skirt, and then I do some serious reading of Donne, or decipher and transcribe a few seventeenth century letters [img]tongue.gif[/img] Oh, and my boyfriend and I split household tasks equally, thanks very much. In fact, thanks to the feminine quality of multitasking, I am actually pondering what I will cook for him tonight, even as I write my only slightly tongue-in-cheek polemic to you. Second, your stereotyping is just way off. As Willow rightly pointed out, you just cannot draw any conclusions about scientific breakthroughs since NOWADAYS, women have equal opportunities. It's not that far back that what people thought a good woman was one who didn't demand much more education than secondary school, who stayed at home, ran the household and pooped out children on a regular basis. I very highly doubt that women's vainness has anything at all to do with their lack of scientific breakthroughs. * - Before I get the Testosterone Brigade on my neck, notice the "few" and "some of them". I know a lot has been accomplished in terms of equal opportunities, although, as Willow rightly states, there are still many instances where the woman is expected to work part time and look after the children, while there are far less opportunities for men to become (partial) housemen. But still, just in case it wasn't totally clear, I'm not saying equal opportunities are still non-existent as they used to be. Sometimes it's a glass ceiling or a sexist boss that stops a woman from achieving, sometimes it's her own lack of ambition or a choice to become a full time mother, etc. [ 09-23-2003, 12:14 PM: Message edited by: Melusine ]
__________________
[img]\"hosted/melusine.jpg\" alt=\" - \" /><br />Your voice is ambrosia |
|
09-23-2003, 12:10 PM | #14 |
Bastet - Egyptian Cat Goddess
Join Date: September 5, 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Age: 49
Posts: 3,491
|
Many studies show that guys 'usually' do better at science, and maths while girls do better at reading, writing, arts, and literature for the most part.
It was like that with me and my sister. She was horrible at math and physics, while I was not so hot at language(English), and French. I was older so my sister had her own tutor. Not that we didn't do well in those studies we just were not interested in them so we didn't do has well as we could. Lets look at the engineering field, even though equal opportunity exist and they actually try to push girls now to do computer science, and engineering, the classrooms still mostly composed of guys. It isn't that girls can not do well, it is just they are not usually interested in equations and theory behind how the world works. [ 09-23-2003, 12:18 PM: Message edited by: pritchke ] |
09-23-2003, 12:19 PM | #15 | |
Ma'at - Goddess of Truth & Justice
Join Date: September 19, 2001
Location: Behind these metal bars
Age: 41
Posts: 3,117
|
Quote:
__________________
I <b>am</b> the party!!<br /> [img]\"http://zert0.net/iuti/img2/1381585-vi.gif\" alt=\" - \" /> |
|
09-23-2003, 12:20 PM | #16 |
Legion Symbol
Join Date: May 29, 2002
Location: Somewhere in between
Age: 39
Posts: 7,029
|
I really don't care [img]tongue.gif[/img] . Everyone’s an individual and is unique! blah blah blah. You've heard it all before. (I hope). Seriously though; what’s the point of this thread? Are you trying to prove something? Statistics can be used to prove anything. In short, why do you care? Don't you have anything better to do then bash the various genders? [img]tongue.gif[/img]
(Yeah, I'm feeling somewhat whimsical today).
__________________
Skydracgrrl: Cruelty, thy name is Cal! --- There are none so blind as those who refuse to see, none so deaf as those who refuse to hear, and none so smelly as those who refuse to bathe. |
09-23-2003, 12:23 PM | #17 | |
Bastet - Egyptian Cat Goddess
Join Date: September 5, 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Age: 49
Posts: 3,491
|
Quote:
When it comes to cooking I cook most of the meals, yet my GF does all the baking. As for convincing girls to do science or guys ito music etc. I think we should just support people and let them do what they enjoy. [ 09-23-2003, 12:29 PM: Message edited by: pritchke ] |
|
09-23-2003, 12:23 PM | #18 | |
Dracolisk
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Age: 43
Posts: 6,541
|
Quote:
Oh and judging by Avatar's last topic about fat guys hating him, sadly I doubt he is joking. Edit - Oh and just to clear things up: I absolutely do NOT consider myself a feminist and when discussing literary theories in class I often find myself strongly opposing overly feminist readings of texts. I'm getting tired of the use of the term anyway. [ 09-23-2003, 12:34 PM: Message edited by: Melusine ] |
|
09-23-2003, 01:02 PM | #19 | |
Ma'at - Goddess of Truth & Justice
Join Date: September 19, 2001
Location: Behind these metal bars
Age: 41
Posts: 3,117
|
Quote:
EDIT: Oh, right. Didn't read the post above. [ 09-23-2003, 01:03 PM: Message edited by: Horatio ]
__________________
I <b>am</b> the party!!<br /> [img]\"http://zert0.net/iuti/img2/1381585-vi.gif\" alt=\" - \" /> |
|
09-23-2003, 01:33 PM | #20 |
Galvatron
Join Date: January 10, 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 56
Posts: 2,109
|
Many factors here, here's some of the information I've dug up in researching the subject:
Women Develop Faster : Some recent research seems to indicate that women intellectually develop a lot faster (which results in better grades in primary and secondary education), and men catch up later in life. By the prime wage earning years the report claims men have IQ ratings on average 6 points higher. Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics : Statistically speaking, men have a wider bell curve when it comes to intelligence... the top 10% and bottom 10% of the intellectual range are almost exclusively male. Women tend to cluster near the middle. Choice : Many of our brightest women make the choice to become mothers and stay home with children. While the option is more and more open to men, there is still a "Lace Curtain" that surrounds the areas of traditional female power... and it's far more solid than the "glass ceiling" is these days. This will result in a reduction in the number of women that are in a position to make the big contribution. Choice : From infancy, girls focus on human interaction, and boys focus on mechanical constructs. This has been proven in quite a few studies (although the rad-fems don't want anyone to know it). Boys and girls are hard-wired to have different interests, right from infancy where girls are far more interested in faces than boys. Generally, boys will be drawn to math and sciences, girls to the arts and humanities. School structure : In the last 30 years schools have been revamped in order to improve the performance of girls, and the process has been a stunning success. Now it's time to do the same for our boys, who are experienceing huge problems in schools all over the western world. I believe that many of the changes made to help girls have inadvertantly hurt boys, in addition the "defanging" of teachers has made it virtually impossible for them to enforce discipline... something that boys absolutely need in order to perform. Finally, we need more male teachers! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I HATE BOYS VS. I HATE GIRLS (this is a hilarious poem) | Harkoliar | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 4 | 11-24-2002 03:46 PM |
Girls out peformed Boys again at GCSE | Avatar | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 16 | 08-26-2002 02:46 AM |
boys and girls sounds | ZFR | Baldurs Gate & Tales of the Sword Coast | 3 | 03-14-2002 03:42 AM |
Boys vs. Girls! A strategic battle of the sexes!! | Larry_OHF | Ironworks Online Roleplaying | 70 | 03-03-2002 03:55 PM |
What time is it boys and girls? Its multi time w/ charlie and trusty sidekick CB! | turbovee | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 18 | 03-14-2001 11:44 PM |