10-08-2002, 05:12 AM | #51 | |
Banned User
Join Date: March 1, 2001
Location: VT, USA
Age: 63
Posts: 3,097
|
Quote:
Mark |
|
10-08-2002, 10:11 AM | #52 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
10-08-2002, 11:01 AM | #53 |
40th Level Warrior
Join Date: July 11, 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 11,916
|
Magick, out of all the nasty things you said about me in this thread, the only thing in your last post I truly wish to quote is:
"I am completley against taxation that rips 48% of every dollar I make out of my pocket." This says it all. You either don't understand the tax rate system or you are the least tax-savvy wealthy man I've ever met. Need a good tax lawyer? While this may seem [img]graemlins/offtopic.gif[/img] I post it to challenge your understanding of what you pay and where your money goes. I still point out that I agree with you that the WASTE in our bureaucracy is a problem. But, when I simply state it happens with military spending as well as any other spending, you balk. Does that make sense to you? You then blame outlandish prices paid for simple tools on dems again, deflecting blame and ranting. Can you cut it so black and white? If so, I certainly envy you. Part of my every moment, at work and at play, is concerned with constant strive for efficiency. I am not going to disagree that more (or at the very least some) efficiency is needed in the government. It pisses me off, too. But you're not advocating shutting the doors of government are you? I mean, do you think they're going to give your tax dollars back? To put it in perspective, there are interest groups at work here that you may or may not be aware of. The teachers in Chicago have been striking - first in northern burbs, then southern. Court personnel are also forming labor unions to demand better benefits. The State of Illinois, which is flat broke, sought to make up some money be decreasing benefits to court personnel (including bailiffs, docket clerks, etc, which you can bet your ass are all affirmative action jobs). The answer was simple - strike. Do not these things tie the hands of a government that (ideally, though certainly not the case) wishes and strives to be efficient. Are there not more variables at work here than simply wasteful bureaucracy? Just some thoughts. I don't see too much offensive material in this post, but if you deign to flame me again, and lump me with folks I don't know and perjoritize, please PM me and save yourself the embarrassment of looking petty here in public. [ 10-08-2002, 11:10 AM: Message edited by: Timber Loftis ] |
10-08-2002, 11:09 AM | #54 |
40th Level Warrior
Join Date: July 11, 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 11,916
|
MagicK again:
Oh, and just to set the record straight: I've lived in a trailer too. And no, I don't need to use any euphemisms like mobile home. Upstanding, honest folks, as you suggest? As with all of life, some but not all. More likely just people struggling to make the best of their situation. I described a type of Vermonter (and we've got Vermonters here who'd flame me if they took umbrage), not a set of characteristics inherent to those who live in trailers. If Foxworthy can speak in plain truths to all of America, I'm sure your sensibilities can take it coming from me. "As good sociologists we make generalizations about groups not individuals." Did your willingness to stereotype me follow this maxim? |
10-08-2002, 11:09 AM | #55 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I only give what I get. Altho I sometimes amplify the return.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|