01-18-2004, 11:59 AM | #11 |
Fzoul Chembryl
Join Date: February 19, 2002
Location: Your guess is as good as mine.
Age: 52
Posts: 1,728
|
Sir Krustin,
Thanks for the link. Anyway, as the saying goes: Once bitten twice Shy. I don't think I will be using AMD CPUs for a long time. Unless if I really need to upgrade my PC and low on budget. To be honest, I have been using Intel CPUs since the early 120 MMX and I haven't encounter any problwm with the CPU before. Besides, Intel has never claimed that their CPUs are as fast as AMD xxx CPUs. Just plain raw CPU power in terms of speed in MHz or GHz is good enough for me.
__________________
(This is an invisible sig.) |
01-18-2004, 04:55 PM | #12 |
Elminster
Join Date: September 25, 2003
Location: In The Darkness...
Age: 37
Posts: 442
|
AMD processors are cheaper but they sacriface stability and quality for their cheapness. Intel Processors (excluding the celeron) are more stable and have quality even though they are a bit more expensive. Personally i prefer intel's processors (except the celeron) but people liek AMD because they are cost effective (i guess).
[ 01-18-2004, 05:00 PM: Message edited by: The Fallen One ]
__________________
[img]\"http://ox.wit.edu/~pokharela/exermv4.jpg\" alt=\" - \" /><br />--------------------<br /> [img]\"http://ox.wit.edu/~pokharela/kana.gif\" alt=\" - \" /> |
01-18-2004, 04:59 PM | #13 |
Elminster
Join Date: September 25, 2003
Location: In The Darkness...
Age: 37
Posts: 442
|
interpid, a piece of advice, if u have to choose between a celeron and an AMD processor, go with the AMD. The Celerons are just busted P4 processors with no cache on the processor. No cache makes the processor alot slower than the stated speed. But AMDs have the cache and the prices are around the same as the celerons. Celeron < AMD < P4 . Get a P4 if possible but AMD is definately better if u have to choose between that and a celeron.
__________________
[img]\"http://ox.wit.edu/~pokharela/exermv4.jpg\" alt=\" - \" /><br />--------------------<br /> [img]\"http://ox.wit.edu/~pokharela/kana.gif\" alt=\" - \" /> |
01-18-2004, 05:10 PM | #14 |
Ironworks Moderator
Join Date: March 1, 2001
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,788
|
In terms of bangs per buck, the AMD XP2800 (Barton) would seem to be right up there. In fact, I'm currently toying with the idea of flashing my mobo's BIOS and fitting one to replace my XP2200.
__________________
Regards Mouse (Occasional crooner and all round friendly Scottish rodent) |
01-18-2004, 05:25 PM | #15 | |
Ironworks Webmaster
Join Date: January 4, 2001
Location: Lakeland, Florida
Age: 51
Posts: 11,720
|
Quote:
AMD 2600 XP = $100.00 US AMD 2700 XP = $113.00 US AMD 2800 XP = $137.00 US AMD 3000 XP = $197.00 US AMD 3200 XP = $220.00 US Here is the link to all the AMD's. Personally, if I were you, I would go with the AMD 2600 XP. It's cheap and fast!!
__________________
Ziroc™ Ironworks Gaming Webmaster www.ironworksgaming.com The Great Escape Studios - 2D/3D Modeling www.tgeweb.com & Ziroc's Facebook Page Visit My Flickr Photo Album |
|
01-18-2004, 05:54 PM | #16 |
Galvatron
Join Date: January 10, 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 56
Posts: 2,109
|
For total craziness get a Dual Opteron workstation (I've got one on order at work)
For top performance that doesn't break the bank go Athlon64 FX For good performance/mid price go Intel P4. For affordable systems go Athlon XP |
01-19-2004, 02:19 AM | #17 | |
Symbol of Cyric
Join Date: March 28, 2003
Location: Australia
Age: 37
Posts: 1,124
|
Quote:
|
|
01-19-2004, 02:28 AM | #18 | |
Symbol of Cyric
Join Date: March 28, 2003
Location: Australia
Age: 37
Posts: 1,124
|
Quote:
Thanks again. |
|
01-19-2004, 09:55 AM | #19 |
The Magister
Join Date: August 29, 2002
Location: Faerun
Age: 43
Posts: 102
|
Intel rules! Never did like AMD. Had that K6-3 and the Athlon... had nothing but grief when trying to run a myraid of different applications. Its like the chips would skip code instruction and then just die.
Intel, Gigabyte mobos, and corsair ram. can't go wrong with the 8iH* combination mobos. |
01-19-2004, 02:25 PM | #20 | |
Galvatron
Join Date: January 10, 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 56
Posts: 2,109
|
Quote:
I've had mixed luck myself with Gigabyte, one board failed after 6 months or so... the second I'm still using and has worked very well. I like Mushkin DDR but at the high end there's several decent vendors (no one should EVER buy the crap no-name brands... not worth it). Here's the Opteron box I just ordered, can't wait to see what it can do: Poly 2020A Dual Opteron ATX MB w/8x AGP, Gigabit Lan 2 AMD Opteron Model 240 Processors (64 bit-1.8Ghz) 4 DDR333 512Meg ECC/Registered Maxtor 60GB ATA133 7200RPM IDE Hard Disk 2 WD SATA 36G 10kRPM HDD 8M Cache Sony DVD+RW DRU-530A Nvidia GeForceFX 5900 Ultra 256M 8x AGP 2 NEC Multisync LCD2080UX-BK 20" LCD Displays I'm going to drop another $12k in Matrox Vision Processing hardware into the beast and take it for a test drive... see what kind of performance I can get out of the non uniform memory architecture. Probably start with a dual boot XP64/64 bit SuSE Linux setup. I've got a SCSI Raid array with a 64bit PCI-X controller waiting in the wings if the SATA stuff isn't fast enough... but from what I've heard it should be plenty fast. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|