Should USA atack Irak

[Megabot]

Should USA atack Irak?

[SecretMaster]

Uh, just out of curiousity, why did u make this?

[Grojlach]

Why should they? "Because they can?"
Absolutely not.
Though the US doesn't really like being in the aggressor role I think, they'd like to think of themselves that they only attack if others make the first move and "are obviously asking for it". Though even the slightest incident could be just the excuse they were looking for to start one.

[ 07-06-2002, 02:17 AM: Message edited by: Grojlach ]

[Scholarcs]

No, the USA should not attack Iraq. Unless they wanted to prove once and for all that they are the provokers/aggressors.

[ 07-06-2002, 02:13 AM: Message edited by: Scholarcs ]

[Morgan_Corbesant]

actually, if we want to rid the world of terrorism, then that means ALL terrorism. to have a man pay thousands of dollars to any volunteer suicide bombers families, is terror. everyone on this forum from OTHER countries condemns the USA for its "big brother" policy. well, i agree, to a point. i see EVERYONE that needs help coming to the USA. during WWII, you europeans didnt complain much when we bailed you out with hitler, but now that it is someone who DOESNT involve you, we are in the wrong. well, that is so hipocritical. if big ben, or the eifel tower, or anything historical of YOURS was attacked, then you would GLADLY except us in a counter attack. you cant say you wouldnt, because it hasnt happened. persoanaly, i say let the world deal with their own problems for a decade or two. then the world would see how America actually helps it. i say, focus on our problems within our own country, ie. Drugs, gangs, murder, famine, etc. and stop feeding the hungry of somewhere else. stop BOMBING someone, and then spend MILLIONS more rebuilding and feeding them. that is MY tax money too, and it is ridiculeous. spend a few billion on our country, to fix it, and get rid of poverty, and the leaches of America. then we will see how the world gets along without "big brother". that is just my opinion though. im tired of people getting down on America because of all the good it does, simply because a few liberals dont agree with the killing of the "innocent". this isnt meant to be a flame, or an attack of any kind, so please, nobody take it as such. just my opinion, and my being tired of the attacks we get everyday, be it verbal or physical. that is all, good day. (eve)

sorry if my spelling is bad. im drunk, and its late. thank you.

[ 07-06-2002, 02:53 AM: Message edited by: Morgan_Corbesant ]

[K T Ong]

The Japanese in the 19th Century wanted the Americans to leave them alone. It was the Americans who forced the Japanese to open themselves up. Ask Commodore Perry.

[Grojlach]

Originally posted by Morgan_Corbesant: during WWII, you europeans didnt complain much when we bailed you out with hitler, but now that it is someone who DOESNT involve you, we are in the wrong. well, that is so hipocritical.

And in what way is this comparable to the current situation in Iraq? Las time I checked they didn't invade any countries in the past few years... And after the Gulf War, I doubt they are really eager to try again.

Don't forget Germany, Italy and Japan teamed up during the Second World War, and when Japan attacked American targets, not only Japan declared war on the US, Germany and Italy technically declared war on the US on the same time.

[ 07-06-2002, 03:16 AM: Message edited by: Grojlach ]

[Megabot]

Uh, just out of curiousity, why did u make this?

Because i se it on the news every day that "maby" US will atack Irak because of the terror thingie!

Why should they? "Because they can?" Absolutely not. Though the US doesn't really like being in the aggressor role I think, they'd like to think of themselves that they only attack if others make the first move and "are obviously asking for it". Though even the slightest incident could be just the excuse they were looking for to start one

Nonsens Groj US atak what they want without any "help" from Europe or something they are the ultimate power in this world so they can "wipe" out ANYTHING if the want so spear me , but they maby want some suport for what they do so not all the people and UN hate them for what they do and i hoped they could "clean up" the middle east to! because we rest of the world are "■■■■■ cats! who dont dear to do anything in this world only US must do what it have to be done here because of the brave people in US and i think the people in US hate "wars" long away from theyrs border is not good but i think most of them DONT like "terrorisme! and they do what they can to kill this "canser" from the world like Bin Laden and Sadam! !

[ 07-06-2002, 03:49 AM: Message edited by: Megabot ]

[WillowIX]

Is Saddam an evil man? Crazy, tyrant, greedy for power and a religious rasist I can agree with... But still the majority of the people in Irak aren´t like that, are they? And assasinating world leaders? Has that ever worked?

[skywalker]

I did not vote and I refuse to give my opinion on the subject. I have strong feelings about this and I'll just keep it to myself. Thank You.

Mark