|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
04-13-2004, 01:53 PM | #21 | |
Ninja Storm Shadow
Join Date: March 27, 2001
Location: Northport,Alabama, USA
Age: 62
Posts: 3,577
|
Quote:
__________________
Crustiest of the OLD COOTS "Donating mirrors for years to help the Liberal/Socialist find their collective rear-ends, because both hands doesn't seem to be working. Veitnam 61-65:KIA 1864 66:KIA 5008 67:KIA 9378 68:KIA 14594 69:KIA 9414 70:KIA 4221 71:KIA 1380 72:KIA 300 Afghanistan2001-2008 KIA 585 2009-2012 KIA 1465 and counting Davros 1 Much abliged Massachusetts |
|
04-13-2004, 02:16 PM | #22 | |
Galvatron
Join Date: January 22, 2002
Location: california wine country
Age: 60
Posts: 2,193
|
Quote:
__________________
“This is an impressive crowd, the haves and the have mores. <br />Some people call you the elite. <br />I call you my base.”<br />~ George W. Bush (2000) |
|
04-13-2004, 02:21 PM | #23 | |
Galvatron
Join Date: January 22, 2002
Location: california wine country
Age: 60
Posts: 2,193
|
Quote:
__________________
“This is an impressive crowd, the haves and the have mores. <br />Some people call you the elite. <br />I call you my base.”<br />~ George W. Bush (2000) |
|
04-13-2004, 02:31 PM | #24 |
40th Level Warrior
Join Date: July 11, 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 11,916
|
Even a public speech can limit the reporters and camera crews if it's made on private property. If Clinton's speeches that he makes at various schools were open to the media, there wouldn't be much reason to pay him $200K a pop, would there?
The media is routinely kept out of courtrooms, jailhouses, schools, private venues, etc. Just because you've got a camera or microphone doesn't give you carte blanche to go where you please and record what you please. You may note no media recording devices are allowed inside the Supreme Court. Why do you think we get all those artists' drawings of the hearings? Erm... to note: before I get too entrenched here defending the dumbest "textualist" in history, I just want to let you know I am no fan of Antonin Scalia. [ 04-13-2004, 02:36 PM: Message edited by: Timber Loftis ] |
04-13-2004, 03:17 PM | #25 |
Zartan
Join Date: March 11, 2001
Location: North Carolina USA
Age: 57
Posts: 5,177
|
I think that is the whole point TL, it doesn't matter if you love or hate him, this story just doesn't smack of any wrong doing on his part.
__________________
[img]\"http://home.carolina.rr.com/orthanc/pics/Spinning%20Hammer%20Sig%20Pic.gif\" alt=\" - \" /> |
04-13-2004, 04:15 PM | #26 | |
Galvatron
Join Date: January 22, 2002
Location: california wine country
Age: 60
Posts: 2,193
|
Quote:
__________________
“This is an impressive crowd, the haves and the have mores. <br />Some people call you the elite. <br />I call you my base.”<br />~ George W. Bush (2000) |
|
04-13-2004, 04:46 PM | #27 |
40th Level Warrior
Join Date: July 11, 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 11,916
|
Well, fair enough Rokenn. But, I think if you go recheck the article you'll find out that his policy is simple: he tells you ahead of time when you can't have a recording device. At the first event, he had not informed anyone, and it was therefore inappropriate for the agents to take the recordings.
|
04-13-2004, 05:11 PM | #28 |
Zartan
Join Date: March 11, 2001
Location: North Carolina USA
Age: 57
Posts: 5,177
|
Well, I'd say the title of the thread seems to imply a strike on his part against Freedom Of The Press which clearly wasn't evidenced by the story, in particular, or the practice, in general.
You might think his action was wrongheaded, but that doesn't mean it violated the Freedom of the Press in any way... not even it's spirit. It did cause him to rethink his policy, but I certainly hope the change was made because of a true desire that he should allow coverage and not because of the publicity involved, because it has caused him to treat the different media outlets differently. Now the print media will be allowed to tape his appearances at functions, but he'll still deny broadcast media access? Seems to me he was in better shape before, at least he was being fair. [ 04-13-2004, 05:25 PM: Message edited by: Ronn_Bman ]
__________________
[img]\"http://home.carolina.rr.com/orthanc/pics/Spinning%20Hammer%20Sig%20Pic.gif\" alt=\" - \" /> |
04-13-2004, 05:24 PM | #29 |
Banned User
Join Date: September 3, 2001
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Age: 62
Posts: 1,463
|
Is it that he doesn't want his image recorded but has no problem with audio recordings? If that's the case, it wouldn't be inconsistent - some people are camera shy...
|
04-13-2004, 05:29 PM | #30 |
40th Level Warrior
Join Date: July 11, 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 11,916
|
Actually, I think it's that he doesn't want off-the-cuff comments made at numerous speeches being turned against him the next time he writes a judicial opinion. The justices really try to hold themselves aloof from the media, you know. They try to maintain an appearance and aura of sequestered legal reflection and reasoning largely unaffected by the ebb and flow of mass media.
Of course, they make gaffs. Like when S.D. O'Connor mentioned that if Gore won, she wouldn't be able to retire when she wanted (because she can't trust a Democrat to replace her). |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trial by press conference | Chewbacca | General Discussion | 6 | 06-04-2004 01:55 AM |
Should Press cover all Casualties? | pritchke | General Discussion | 2 | 07-24-2003 10:02 AM |
More violations of Freedom of the Press and civil rights of reporters | Rokenn | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 1 | 03-13-2003 01:32 PM |
How much can YOU bench press? | SomeGuy | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 53 | 08-01-2002 02:09 AM |
Press mention | Mouse | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 12 | 08-10-2001 07:43 PM |