09-24-2004, 12:54 PM | #1 |
Bastet - Egyptian Cat Goddess
Join Date: September 5, 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Age: 49
Posts: 3,491
|
Well that is another one.
HALIFAX (CP) - Nova Scotia became the sixth province or territory to allow same-sex marriages when the province's Supreme Court ruled Friday that banning such unions is unconstitutional. Source Ontario, British Columbia, Quebec, the Yukon, Manitoba and Nova Scotia now allow same-sex marriages. While it is slightly less than 50% since there are 13 provinces and territories, the provinces that have allowed it are some of the more populated ones (Ontario, British Columbia, Quebec) so I think we are looking at 80 to 90% of the population. [ 09-24-2004, 12:55 PM: Message edited by: pritchke ] |
09-24-2004, 02:03 PM | #2 |
Baaz Draconian
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: Neb.
Age: 58
Posts: 725
|
That's great news. Hopefully the U.S. can learn something by it.
__________________
HoHo What! |
09-24-2004, 02:09 PM | #3 |
40th Level Warrior
Join Date: July 11, 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 11,916
|
You mean like publishing pamphlets to help advise homosexuals on the benefits of moving to Canada?
|
09-24-2004, 03:25 PM | #4 |
Baaz Draconian
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: Neb.
Age: 58
Posts: 725
|
Good one Timber, but no.
__________________
HoHo What! |
09-24-2004, 07:24 PM | #5 |
Apophis
|
I'm still waiting for Canada to collapse into ruin and fire and brimstone because of laws like this. Apparently it should happen soon.
__________________
http://cavestory.org PLAY THIS GAME. Seriously. http://xkcd.com/386/ http://www.xkcd.com/406/ My heart is like my coffee. Black, bitter, icy, and with a straw. |
09-24-2004, 07:47 PM | #6 |
Lord Ao
Join Date: May 27, 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 2,061
|
We'll let you know when it happens.
__________________
Where there is a great deal of free speech, there is always a certain amount of foolish speech. - Winston S. Churchill |
09-25-2004, 11:01 AM | #7 | |
Manshoon
Join Date: July 28, 2004
Location: Seattle-Redmond WA
Age: 57
Posts: 178
|
Quote:
__________________
Namaste |
|
09-25-2004, 05:01 PM | #8 |
Lord Ao
Join Date: May 27, 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 2,061
|
There's actually been quite a few American couples who've travelled up here to get married - I saw some articles in the paper right after it became legal in BC. Their marriages are not recognized in the States of course, but the formal commitment matters to them.
__________________
Where there is a great deal of free speech, there is always a certain amount of foolish speech. - Winston S. Churchill |
10-02-2004, 01:08 AM | #9 |
Symbol of Cyric
Join Date: August 19, 2001
Location: Portland, Oregon
Age: 45
Posts: 1,224
|
Yeah because homosexuality is natural. Male pheramones (sp) are there to attract males. Two males can NATURAL concieve with each other. Plain and simple, sperm (produced by male) is needed to fertilize an egg (produced by females). Even with artificial insemination, its still a sperm (again, male) that did it. If two male bears in the woods ever start to do it in order to produce and it is successfull, then I would be more inclined to agree with it. I think they should be allowed to date, I'm not against individual rights or anything, but marriage is definately out.
Look at it from a religious standpoint: Sadam and Gamora (sp) enough said.
__________________
Morgan Corbesant, Elven BladeSinger, Captain of the army of the Seldarine<br /><br /> [img]\"http://www.rleeermey.com/images/linkbanners/usmcredwhiteblue.gif\" alt=\" - \" /><br />Protector of Elves<br />Slayer of Orcs<br /><br />ALL YOUR BASE, ARE BELONG TO US!!!<br />I DON\'T FIGHT FOR HONOR, I FIGHT TO WIN!<br />\"One who is a samurai must before all things keep constantly in mind, by day and by night...the fact that he has to die\". <br />-Daidoji Yuzan-<br />16th Century |
10-02-2004, 01:26 AM | #10 |
Baaz Draconian
Join Date: August 22, 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia.
Age: 39
Posts: 737
|
If you look at it that way, morgan (or, the bedrock view of marriage to produce children) you should also make it illegal, or unrecognize marriages between straight couples that cannot conceive.
Its not their fault that they cant have babies, much like it is not my fault I cannot produce with the partner of my choice. Does that make any sense? |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gay Couples Line Up for Mass. Marriages | Dreamer128 | General Discussion | 10 | 05-19-2004 12:46 AM |
San Francisco's Gay Marriages to Continue, for Now | Dreamer128 | General Discussion | 76 | 03-13-2004 11:38 PM |
Regarding "same sex" marriages... | Rokenn | General Discussion | 0 | 03-01-2004 01:10 PM |
Same sex marriages. Your opinon? Volume two. | Cloudbringer | General Discussion | 232 | 08-15-2003 02:57 AM |
Same sex marriages. Your opinion? | Sir Kenyth | General Discussion | 250 | 08-08-2003 03:41 PM |