 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
04-06-2001, 03:25 PM
|
#1 |
|
Avatar
 Join Date: March 21, 2001
Location: Toronto,Ontario,Canada
Posts: 564
|
Who did you find harder to beat,Fikraag or Kangaxx?
I think Kangaxx was 5 times harder than Fikraag,but I want to know everybodys else opinion. ------------------  Don't mess with the Lich |
|
|
04-06-2001, 03:28 PM
|
#2 |
|
Elminster
 Join Date: March 31, 2001
Location: Québec,Canada
Posts: 403
|
Kangaax is way harder than Firkraag!!!
|
|
|
|
04-06-2001, 03:31 PM
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Kangaxx is MUCH!!!!! harder to beat, unless you use a magical protection scroll.
 ------------------  My website http://hesperex.8k.com Hesperex Freth: 1st son of Matron Mother Shi'nayne Freth, 1st house of Ched'Nesad. Weapon master and patron of house Freth. |
|
04-06-2001, 03:32 PM
|
#4 |
|
Dungeon Master
 Join Date: March 29, 2001
Location: Good \'Ole Montana
Posts: 56
|
I've killed all Firkraag and the Shadow dragon while with a lvl 10-12 party, and I can't kill Kangaxx with the same party, so I'm gonna have to say Gaxx is harder.
|
|
|
|
04-06-2001, 05:33 PM
|
#5 |
|
Elminster
Join Date: March 17, 2001
Location: MA USA - Cape Cod
Age: 36
Posts: 449
|
Firkraag was harder. The kangaxx demi-lich was easy. I just used korgans rage and was gone in an instant.
|
|
|
|
04-06-2001, 05:42 PM
|
#6 |
|
Manshoon
 Join Date: March 1, 2001
Location: California
Posts: 205
|
Kangaxx is definetely harder. All those imprisonment spells i just can't take them.
------------------ That's just my opinion, I could be wrong. |
|
|
|
04-06-2001, 06:19 PM
|
#7 |
|
Elminster
Join Date: March 17, 2001
Location: MA USA - Cape Cod
Age: 36
Posts: 449
|
I thought Firkraag was harder than kangaxx. I kill him with one guy without protection.
Whith Firkraag i put on a wizard with boots of speed and cloak of mirroring. I ran around in circles while backup mages kept spell striking him. Died 1000 x. |
|
|
|
04-06-2001, 07:00 PM
|
#8 |
|
Symbol of Cyric
 Join Date: March 17, 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,160
|
Definitely Kangaxx - you wouldn't stand a chance without some protection of some sort.
I say that Firkraag should be a bit tougher for an AD&D dragon don't you think? ------------------  Greetings mortals, my name is Wah, Arch Lich Wah. |
|
|
|
04-06-2001, 07:21 PM
|
#9 |
|
Ninja Storm Shadow
 Join Date: March 1, 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,537
|
Depends who you are pitting against Kangaxx or the red dragon, for example a berserker/mage (solo) will have a much harder time dealing with the red dragon than Kangaxx, which is my case.
------------------ Long live H22A1!!!!! |
|
|
|
04-06-2001, 07:56 PM
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hard to say. They're both so different. It took me less attempts to kill Kangaxx, but I was a high level when I met him (wait till he meets my Chicken lord - doom!)
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Kangaxx | Tyranny]SiN[ | Baldurs Gate II: Shadows of Amn & Throne of Bhaal | 3 | 09-12-2002 08:47 PM |
| fikraag | no_meagus | Baldurs Gate II: Shadows of Amn & Throne of Bhaal | 8 | 09-10-2002 12:41 PM |
| Getting past the guardian in the fikraag quest??? | lee1001 | Baldurs Gate II: Shadows of Amn & Throne of Bhaal | 9 | 09-09-2002 05:44 AM |
| Hmmm, another Fikraag quest? (SPOILER) | Jerome | Baldurs Gate II Archives | 5 | 07-21-2001 12:13 AM |
| Too low a level to kill Fikraag/Admantium Golem ? | alxander1 | Baldurs Gate II Archives | 15 | 04-11-2001 08:09 AM |
