Weapons of Mass Destruction

[Skunk]

Distorted histroy? BS skunk I've listed several times many links from multible sources both the press and non press sources that have stompted this distorted history BS.

Wow! That's an amazing psychic talent you have there - I didn't even mention what I had in mind and you already knew.
Don't suppose you do state lottery numbers too? Only, cash is a bit tight at the moment and I could use the help picking the right numbers for next week...

[Mordenheim]

Skunk I hear the Iraqi minister has a job opening. Spreading such obvious disinformation should get someone right in. Kinda like how the coalition was not in Baghdad when he could see them from where he was talking.

Arab news? Saudia Arabia? now that's information you can take to the bank

lol

Originally posted by Davros: Quote: Originally posted by Lil Lil: Quote: Originally posted by Skunk: Leastways when we've had enough time to plant some...

OOF! [img]graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

I've been waiting for this to come out. [/QUOTE]I don't see why we don't just go and plant some - there are elements that are always going to believe that if any are found they were planted, so lets just go and plant some and get the "discovery" over and done with.

On that factory where they were claiming Sarin and had soldiers coming out through decontamination - I heard that was proven to be industrial pesticides only.[/QUOTE]I heard that the first tests done showed sarin and 2 other toxic chemicals, that the second tests showed nothing of danger and that the third tests have thus far "been inconclusive".

You're welcome to trek over there and plany anything you want...I've stated already that I think Saddam's regime would have had them removed already...if they even had them to begin with.

[Davros]

Originally posted by Lil Lil: You're welcome to trek over there and plant anything you want...

An invite to a war zone - why thank you Princess - uh, but I will decline if you don't mind . Too much friendly and unfriendly fire going on at the moment. I wouldn't know which direction to duck from.

On the topic of WOMD, we (the coalition) are going to look a right bunch of dills if we can't produce any. People are know changing the slant of this war to a humanitarian one, but that is not what the coalition went to war for. It went there to take away Saddam's dangerous toys. Operation Iraqii Liberation was more a public relations afterthought.

Originally posted by Davros: Quote: Originally posted by Lil Lil: You're welcome to trek over there and plant anything you want...

An invite to a war zone - why thank you Princess - uh, but I will decline if you don't mind . Too much friendly and unfriendly fire going on at the moment. I wouldn't know which direction to duck from.

On the topic of WOMD, we (the coalition) are going to look a right bunch of dills if we can't produce any. People are know changing the slant of this war to a humanitarian one, but that is not what the coalition went to war for. It went there to take away Saddam's dangerous toys. Operation Iraqii Liberation was more a public relations afterthought.[/QUOTE]I understand completely, on all counts. [img]smile.gif[/img]

If we come out looking like a right bunch of dills it will certainly add fuel to the fire against "The Great Satan" for sure...but it might also get Bush out of office too and the only bad thing I can see in that is that Australia has proven themselves to be our worthy allies, making your country just as much a target for martyrdom...maybe not as easily reached, but it stings from where I sit.

[Animal]

I still haven't seen an answer to the original question.

IF Saddam is the sadastic, evil dictator that he is claimed to be, with no remorse about gassing his own people...

THEN why was there no usage of so called WoMD. I don't think he'd hesitate to use them on 'infidels' if he uses them on his own people.

[Night Stalker]

Originally posted by Animal: I still haven't seen an answer to the original question. IF Saddam is the sadastic, evil dictator that he is claimed to be, with no remorse about gassing his own people... THEN why was there no usage of so called WoMD. I don't think he'd hesitate to use them on 'infidels' if he uses them on his own people.

Quite simply because it is not possible to prove a negative. It is not possible to divine anothers actions until they do them.

We (those of us getting info only through news feeds) have no idea about the capabilities of Iraq's WMD or it's current ability to deploy them. There is also very little ability to determine any status on Iraqi WMD until the country is stablized and the country can be inspected thouroughly.

Just because he hasn't used them doesn't mean he doesn't have them. It doesn't mean he does have them either, but this whole speculative question is just that, and moot to debate.

By not using them (provided he has them) he further serves his own cause in promoting himself as a victim of "The Great Satan" in the eyes of the Arab world and terrorist communities.

[ 04-08-2003, 08:54 PM: Message edited by: Lil Lil ]

[Animal]

Originally posted by Lil Lil: By not using them (provided he has them) he further serves his own cause in promoting himself as a victim of "The Great Satan" in the eyes of the Arab world and terrorist communities.

This is possible the most logical and well thought out opinion I've read. Thanks.

[Animal]

Originally posted by Night Stalker: Quote: Originally posted by Animal: I still haven't seen an answer to the original question. IF Saddam is the sadastic, evil dictator that he is claimed to be, with no remorse about gassing his own people... THEN why was there no usage of so called WoMD. I don't think he'd hesitate to use them on 'infidels' if he uses them on his own people.

Quite simply because it is not possible to prove a negative. It is not possible to divine anothers actions until they do them.

We (those of us getting info only through news feeds) have no idea about the capabilities of Iraq's WMD or it's current ability to deploy them. There is also very little ability to determine any status on Iraqi WMD until the country is stablized and the country can be inspected thouroughly.

Just because he hasn't used them doesn't mean he doesn't have them. It doesn't mean he does have them either, but this whole speculative question is just that, and moot to debate.[/QUOTE]If he has them do you think he'd use them?