Ironworks Gaming Forum - View Single Post - What classes do you think should have been included in BG2

Aurican · 04-10-2001, 03:57 PM

I mean realistic classes that wouldn't seriously umbalance the game. What would they be called and what would their abilities and restrictions be?

Mine: Bladesinger - Good only, elf or halfelfs only. No armor greater than chainmail. Can only use weapon of choice which consists of either a dagger, shortsword, broadsword, longsword, katana. Any bladed sword type. After that weapon is choosen you can't specialize in anything else. You can use bows but all other weapons you can't even use, example - axes, maces, twohanded sword, crossbows, etc. With you weapon of choice you can grandmaster but takes longer than fighters to grandmaster. You can stealth like a ranger or monk. You can also cast spells but with the bard progression table.

------------------
Can an elf get a break anywhere these days?

04-10-2001, 03:57 PM	#1
Aurican Elminster Join Date: March 1, 2001 Location: Raleigh, North Carolina Age: 42 Posts: 470	I mean realistic classes that wouldn't seriously umbalance the game. What would they be called and what would their abilities and restrictions be? Mine: Bladesinger - Good only, elf or halfelfs only. No armor greater than chainmail. Can only use weapon of choice which consists of either a dagger, shortsword, broadsword, longsword, katana. Any bladed sword type. After that weapon is choosen you can't specialize in anything else. You can use bows but all other weapons you can't even use, example - axes, maces, twohanded sword, crossbows, etc. With you weapon of choice you can grandmaster but takes longer than fighters to grandmaster. You can stealth like a ranger or monk. You can also cast spells but with the bard progression table. ------------------ Can an elf get a break anywhere these days?