06-19-2002, 10:35 AM
|
#31
|
|
Guest
|
Quote:
Originally posted by andrewas:
dunno, 3rd ed rules are less restrictive than 2nd ed, and I have only about 30 minutes of experience with them. However a chaotic paladin is a contradiction in terms, so I doubt it. Even a fallen paladin or anti-paladin (Both different classes BTW, not just evil paladins) would be Lawful. And paladin/ranger? Just cant see that one working.
|
The original Anti-Paladin class from way back in the days of AD&D the ONLY edition was Chaotic Evil and not lawful [img]smile.gif[/img] Still have the Dragon Magazine articles where they were introduced [img]smile.gif[/img]
|
|
|
|