01-26-2003, 10:10 PM
|
#6
|
|
Guest
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Skunk:
quote:
Eisen for being non-violent the Green party here in the US has been responsible for quite a number of maiming's and human injuries through their tactic of spiking trees about to be taken by lumberjacks.
|
Any illegal activity which is designed to influence public or government opinion meets the definition of terrorism under the Patriot Act - so it would also include Greenpeace (whose actions although non-violent are often illegal).
The definition of terrorism has become a little too wide...[/QUOTE] I didn't say anything about terrorism...why did you quote me then go off on a completely nonrelated tangent? I was countering Eisens claims that the Greens were far far from non-violent. I did not call them terrorists....though now that you brought it up they are eco-terrorists, trying to impose their will via illegal means since they cannot sway the majority to their cause via legal methods.
|
|
|
|