[SpiritWarrior]

Well, it wasn't me trying to present hardcore evidence but actually demonstrate the contradictions in themselves, where the articles say one thing this month and another the next. While I know personally that Yahoo isn't the most reliable source, I mentioned it because these stories appear as headlines on the homepage under "Top news Stories". Millions of people who don't know better get their news from Yahoo.

Yahoo obviously deems it fit to have 'em on their homepage as "News" items. It also bears mentioning that I will see many of these same stories on NBC news that night (or that day), as a "hot topic" or some crap.

My point is only this. Regardless of what your professor would allow, other mainstream media channels with massive audiences are allowing it. For good or for bad it is reaching alot more people than they could ever reach.

While I do happen to agree with you on the unreliability of Yahoo (that was the whole point of my original post), detractors could easily ask just what makes your report superior in comparison? After all, we do see multiple professors and specialists attesting to said articles. Saying you have prepared a paper on it isn't enough to give you the corner-market. For that matter, I myself have done years of study in alternative medicine/vitamin supplementals etc. with hands-on experience.