Ironworks Gaming Forum - View Single Post

Yorick · 01-14-2001, 09:33 PM

Sure, but now that makes the situation opposite to 2nd Ad&d where humans can't multiclass and so are normally the best specialists, whereas in 3rd ed. the advantage is that they can be more than one class better than the others. It's sounds a little disappointing from a roleplay aspect to me and reverses what we have now.

Not everyone likes dualclassing you know. Sometimes dualclassing just makes a character harder to roleplay. Oh, unless your one of those that play the same type of character no matter what he/she is.....

Still, change, sometimes even for the better can be hard to take. It's like they're changing the rules of the world. WHO'S RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS?!?

Oh and smaug I love playing Bards, it's just in 1st ed. You had to be a fighter up to lvl 5-8 or eight then dual to a theif up to lvl 5-9 and then become a bard. Suck!

01-14-2001, 09:33 PM	#45
Yorick Very Mad Bird Join Date: January 7, 2001 Location: Breukelen (over the river from New Amsterdam) Age: 52 Posts: 9,246	Sure, but now that makes the situation opposite to 2nd Ad&d where humans can't multiclass and so are normally the best specialists, whereas in 3rd ed. the advantage is that they can be more than one class better than the others. It's sounds a little disappointing from a roleplay aspect to me and reverses what we have now. Not everyone likes dualclassing you know. Sometimes dualclassing just makes a character harder to roleplay. Oh, unless your one of those that play the same type of character no matter what he/she is..... Still, change, sometimes even for the better can be hard to take. It's like they're changing the rules of the world. WHO'S RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS?!? Oh and smaug I love playing Bards, it's just in 1st ed. You had to be a fighter up to lvl 5-8 or eight then dual to a theif up to lvl 5-9 and then become a bard. Suck!