View Single Post
Old 06-11-2003, 12:36 PM   #8
Barry the Sprout
White Dragon
 

Join Date: October 19, 2001
Location: York, UK.
Age: 42
Posts: 1,815
Quote:
Originally posted by Timber Loftis:
The problem is responsibility. If you do a wrong to someone, you should pay the price. That is the justification for the death penalty altogether. 99% right is NOT ENOUGH to kill someone when you can jail all 100 for life and let the 1 innocent one out when you find out you are wrong. Maybe 99.99% is enough. Personally, I think 1 in 10,000 wrong is acceptable (just barely -- this is LIFE, after all) -- but that is only MY opinion.

But, to ensure prosecutors have REAL REASON when they go for the death penalty, I say we put them on the hook. If a prosecutor (or the boss ordering that the death penalty be sought), is willing to sign a "Life Waiver" then I would truly support the death penalty. That way, when we find out Joe Somebody was killed wrongly, we can go back to the "Life Waiver" and execute that person for the wrong done to Mr. Somebody.

This serves the dual purpose of (1) putting someone on the hook for the wrong and (2) making damn sure prosecutors don't get overzealous. BTW, just so you know, prosecutors are *supposed* to have a different set of elevated ethical rules, and "zealous representation" is specifically NOT their job. They ignore this by and large of course and these days they seek media cases and all sorts of other cases to put medals on their lapels.

So, if no one is willing to sing the "Life Waiver" then that means we shouldn't be seeking the death penalty in the first instance -- jail the guy for life instead. If you can't find a prosecutor willing to say "I'd stake my life on it" then you can't say "we should take a life for it."

Well, that's my "Solve the Problem" system. Radical, I know. [img]smile.gif[/img]
I hate to say it, but it has to be said; what if you were right all along and after you've executed the prosecutor you have to execute the person that conducted the investigation etc. This may seem like a pretty daft point but it basically sums up my less daft and more important one. By making it ok for the state to kill people killing people becomes, on at least one level, an acceptable way of resolving a problem. As a result I'd rather not live in a state that sanctions the death penalty.
__________________
[img]\"http://img1.ranchoweb.com/images/sproutman/certwist.gif\" alt=\" - \" /><br /><br /><i>\"And the angels all pallid and wan,<br />Uprising, unveiling, affirm,<br />That the play is the tragedy, man,<br />And its hero the Conquerer Worm.\"</i><br /> - Edgar Allan Poe
Barry the Sprout is offline