05-28-2003, 02:27 PM
|
#52
|
|
Guest
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Night Stalker:
Won't disagree with you MagiK .... except that the SF was still wrong in destroying (if such is the case) the items. I am not saying that sauceman should not have been discipined. I am saying that the SF was wrong in the chosen action. Yes, since sauceman is 18, his 'rents could toss him out, but that does not give them the right to destroy his property, nor does it give him the right to destroy theirs. Like I said, use the car comparison, since he IS old enough to buy one. Substitute car for games, and the SF is clearly wrong for the destruction.
Now, his 'rents were perfectly justified for disciplining him for bad grades. Especially on their dime.
Sauceman! Study harder! If you didn't like the course, you should have dropped it if it wasn't required!
|
I actually agree with you NS, I wouldn't have destroyed them (My dad burned a ton of my 1970's era comics because he thought they were a waste...now we both realize how much they would be worth today [img]smile.gif[/img] )
Mostly Im playing devils advocate here [img]smile.gif[/img]
|
|
|
|